JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Monday, December 21, 2009




UN report finds Guinea military junta committed crimes against humanity
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 21, 2009 3:40 PM ET

[JURIST] The Guinean military junta committed crimes against humanity during the September 28 incidents at Conakry [BBC backgrounder], according to a report by a UN fact-finding mission leaked Monday. The commission concluded [Reuters report] that military junta leader Moussa Dadis Camara [BBC profile] should be held responsible for the violence at the pro-democracy rally in which soldiers allegedly opened fire, killing more than 150 civilians and wounding more than 1,200. The report was received [press release] by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon [official profile] last week and sent to the UN Security Council [official website] for review. The Security Council is now holding closed-door consultations on the report, and it is unclear what, if any, steps will be taken. Camara currently remains hospitalized, having been shot and wounded by one of his own soldiers earlier this month.

In October, the Security Council called for an investigation [JURIST report] into the alleged human rights abuses. Earlier that month, Guinean Minister of Foreign Affairs Alexandre Cece Loua [GuineeNews profile] said during a visit to the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] that the Guinean judiciary is capable of and intends to investigate [JURIST report] and prosecute any crimes committed during the incidents of September 28. The Guinea junta has created a National Commission for an Independent Investigation that will work with the committee established [JURIST report] by Ban to look into possible human rights abuses by Guinean soldiers. The ICC has placed the Guinean military under preliminary investigation [JURIST report] for human rights violations during the Conakry incident.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


WTO rejects China appeal on US media imports
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 21, 2009 2:15 PM ET

[JURIST] The World Trade Organization (WTO) [official website] on Monday rejected [report, PDF] a Chinese appeal of an August ruling [text, PDF] that Chinese controls on US imports of books, music, and audiovisual materials violate international trade regulations. The dispute [case materials] originally arose in April 2007 when the US filed a complaint over Chinese restrictions allowing certain state-owned companies to reserve the right to import types of entertainment media, effectively forcing US companies to conduct business with only those business channels. The complaint also challenged market access restrictions on foreign service providers. The WTO originally held that while China may still censor certain media content, it may not use censorship as a justification for barriers on trade, and China appealed [JURIST report] that decision. WTO judges rejected the appeal, concluding that China had not produced any evidence to show that the original panel had erred in its ruling. US Trade Representative Ron Kirk [official profile] welcomed the ruling [press release] as a "big win" for the US. Chinese officials did not comment. Monday's ruling is final and cannot be appealed, but made no recommendations as to how China should comply with the decision.

Monday's ruling is the latest result in the struggle for intellectual property rights between the US and China. In January, a dispute settlement panel of the WTO found [report, PDF; JURIST report] for the US that large parts of China's intellectual property scheme are inconsistent with its obligations under several international treaties, including the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) [text]. The panel's findings came as the result of a process initiated against China by the US [JURIST report] in August 2007 for alleged lax enforcement of copyright and trademark violations [JURIST report; WTO backgrounder]. The panel's report concluded that certain provisions of China's copyright law as well as certain Chinese customs measures are inconsistent with TRIPS because they "nullify or impair benefits accruing to the United States."






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


FBI report shows decrease in US violent crime for first half of 2009
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 21, 2009 1:26 PM ET

[JURIST] Violent crime in the US decreased 4.4 percent in the first half of 2009, according to the FBI's Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report [materials; press release] published Monday. Specifically, murder decreased 10 percent, robbery dropped 6.5 percent, forcible rape fell 3.3 percent, and aggravated assault decreased 3.2 percent. While violent crime rates dropped across the country as a whole, in cities of populations between 10,000 and 24,999, violent crime increased 1.7 percent. Additionally, property crime has continued to decrease for the sixth year in a row. The 2009 preliminary report only covers the period of January through June, and a full 2009 report will be released next year.

The drop follows a 1.9 percent decrease for 2008 and a 0.7 percent decrease [JURIST reports] for 2007. That came after two years of increasing rates of similar crimes, including a 2006 increase of 1.3 percent and a 2005 increase of 2.3 percent [JURIST reports].






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN accuses Uganda rebels of war crimes in DRC and Sudan
Sarah Miley on December 21, 2009 1:26 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN on Monday called for leaders of the Ugandan Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) [BBC backgrounder] to be apprehended [UN News Centre report] for war crimes in southern Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) between September 2008 and June 2009. The LRA is accused of killing, raping, and mutilating more than 1,200 men, women, and children, abducting at least 1,400 civilians, and displacing almost 300,000 others. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] called for the rebel leaders to be tried by the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] after releasing two joint reports [text, PDF] with the UN Missions in Sudan and the DRC::


These attacks and systematic and widespread human rights violations carried out by the LRA since mid-September 2008 against Congolese civilians during the armed conflict may constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity for which there is no statute of limitations under international law. It should be recalled that the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines certain human rights violations as crimes against humanity. These acts, committed with knowledge as part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population include, inter alia, murder, torture, rape, sexual slavery and enforced disappearance of persons.

Pillay called for the international community to help apprehend LRA leaders.

In May 2008, Uganda created the High Court of Uganda [JURIST report], which will have the authority to try LRA leaders. There is speculation that the the war crimes court was created to persuade the ICC to drop arrest warrants currently out for the LRA leaders, a conclusion supported by the LRA's refusal to sign a final peace agreement [JURIST report] unless the warrants are suspended. The ICC has repeatedly called for the arrest of the men, and has not conceded to Ugandan requests that the charges be dropped [JURIST reports]. The ICC issued arrest warrants [JURIST report] for LRA rebel leader Joseph Kony and his deputies in October 2005 for 33 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity against Ugandan citizens including murder, rape, sexual enslavement, and conscription of children. The LRA has been notorious for its violent attacks on Ugandan citizens since its formation in 1986, and in recent years has expanded into Sudan and the DRC after being driven out of Uganda. Kony has insisted that he his not guilty [JURIST report] of the atrocities attributed to him, describing himself as a "freedom fighter" rather than a criminal.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Israel ex-PM Olmert pleads not guilty to corruption charges
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 21, 2009 12:22 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert [official profile; JURIST news archive] pleaded not guilty Monday to charges of fraud and corruption that led to his resignation last year. Olmert is accused of illegally accepting cash contributions from American businessman Moshe Talansky, double billing [JURIST reports] travel expenses to the state and charitable donors, and giving his former law partner Uri Messer access to state information. Olmert denied all charges [Haaretz report] against him Monday in his first public response to the allegations. The court is due to begin hearing testimony in the trial on February 22. If convicted, Olmert faces up to five years in prison on each count.

Olmert's trial, the first of a former or current Israeli prime minister, comes after three years of allegations that he abused his official powers during his time as mayor of Jerusalem and minister of industry, trade, and labor. Proceedings began [JURIST report] in September after Attorney General Menahem Mazuz [official profile] formally indicted [JURIST report] Olmert in August, but the trial was postponed until February to allow Olmert to gather evidence necessary for his defense. In April 2007, Olmert was investigated for improperly favoring his supporters [JURIST report] in distributing business grants during his time as trade minister. In January 2007, the Israeli Ministry of Justice announced plans to launch an investigation [JURIST report] into allegations that he promoted the interests of two business associates during the 2005 state sale of Bank Leumi [corporate website].






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Full Myanmar high court to weigh Suu Kyi appeal
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 21, 2009 11:03 AM ET

[JURIST] Myanmar's Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal by opposition pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] against the 18-month extension of her house arrest. The decision for the full court to hear her appeal came as the result of a preliminary hearing held Monday, after the court initially agreed to consider the appeal [JURIST report] earlier this month. Suu Kyi's lawyers filed the appeal last month after a lower court rejected [JURIST reports] an earlier appeal. They argue that her conviction should not stand because it is based on the now-defunct 1974 constitution. No date has been set for the appeal hearing.

The extension of Suu Kyi's house arrest stems from an August conviction [JURIST report] for violating state security laws by allowing American John Yettaw to stay in her home after he swam across a lake to get there. Yettaw, who was sentenced to seven years in prison with four years of hard labor, was released [JURIST report] in August after negotiations with US Senator Jim Webb (D-VA). Suu Kyi was initially sentenced to three years in prison with hard labor, but her sentence was immediately commuted by junta chief General Than Shwe. Suu Kyi has spent 14 of the last 20 years in detention, and her latest conviction has been condemned [BBC report] by many world leaders as a political move to prevent her from running in the upcoming elections. Her conviction has given rise to international sanctions [JURIST report] against Myanmar's junta and members of the judiciary.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Cambodia war crimes court charges fourth former Khmer Rouge leader with genocide
Christian Ehret on December 21, 2009 10:29 AM ET

[JURIST] The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website] on Monday charged former Khmer Rouge [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] leader Ieng Thirith [Trial Watch profile; case materials] with genocide, torture, and persecution, adding to previous charges that include war crimes and murder. Ieng Thirith, the wife of ECCC defendant Ieng Sary [Trial Watch profile; JURIST news archive], served as social affairs minister [Reuters report] for the regime that allegedly caused the death of 1.7 million people between 1975 and 1979. The latest charges stem from the deaths of thousands of Vietnamese and ethnic Cham Muslims. Known as the "Khmer Rouge First Lady," Ieng Thirith was originally arrested [JURIST report] in 2007, along with her husband.

Ieng Thirith is the fourth former official to be charged with genocide. Last week, the ECCC brought genocide charges against former head of state Khieu Samphan, former deputy leader and chief ideologist Nuon Chea, and former foreign minister Ieng Sary [JURIST reports] in connection with the same events. Last month, the court heard final arguments [JURIST report] in its first trial, that of Kaing Guek Eav [Trial Watch profile; JURIST news archive], also known as "Duch." Kaing was the first of eight [JURIST report] ex-Khmer Rouge officials to be tried before the ECCC. A verdict is expected in March.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Senate vote closes debate on proposed health care reform bill
Christian Ehret on December 21, 2009 9:31 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate [official website] agreed on Monday to close the debate [roll call vote] on proposed health care reform legislation [HR 3590 materials], making way for a vote expected Thursday. The agreement was reached by a narrow 60 to 40 vote, requiring every Democrat and Independent vote available. The proposed bill seeks to extend health insurance coverage and prohibit insurance companies from discriminating based on pre-existing conditions. Legal residents would be required to obtain health insurance under the legislation, with subsidies existing for those who cannot afford it. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) [official website] criticized the bill [press release] for its high cost and ineffectiveness, stating that it is inconsistent with President Barack Obama's proposed goals.

Health care reform [JURIST news archive] has been a top priority of the Obama administration for several months. Last month, the US House of Representatives [official website] approved [JURIST report] their reform bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act [HR 3962 materials]. The House legislation has an estimated cost of around $1 trillon [WSJ report] over 10 years, includes a public option, and would extend coverage to nearly 96 percent of Americans. Like the Senate bill, the House version prohibits discrimination based on pre-existing conditions.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org