 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, August 22, 2009 |
 |
|


Federal judge grants Yemeni Guantanamo detainee's habeas petition
Matt Glenn on August 22, 2009 1:08 PM ET

[JURIST] A judge in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] in an opinion unsealed Friday that the US lacks enough evidence to justify the continued detention of Yemeni national Mohammed al-Adahi, granting al-Adahi's petition for habeas corpus [LLI materials]. The government argued that al-Adahi, who has been detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] since 2002, was a supporter or member of the Taliban and/or al-Qaeda, claiming that al-Adahi had acted as an instructor at al Qaeda camp al Farouq, had familial ties to both the Taliban and al Qaeda, had been employed as a bodyguard for Osama bin-Laden and that al-Adahi's story lacked credibility. In ordering al-Adahi's release Judge Gladys Kessler [official profile] of the stated:
There is no reliable evidence in the record that Petitioner was a trainer at Al Farouq, that he ever fought for al-Qaida and/or the Taliban, or that he affirmatively provided any actual support to al-Qaida and/or the Taliban. There is no reliable evidence in the record that Petitioner was a member of al-Qaida and/or the Taliban. While it is tempting to be swayed by the fact that Petitioner readily acknowledged having met Bin Laden on two occasions and admitted that perhaps his relatives were bodyguards and enthusiastic followers of Bin Laden, such evidence-sensational and compelling as it may appear--does not constitute actual, reliable evidence that would justify the Government's detention of this man.
The government may continue to detain al-Adahi while it seeks to find a country willing to accept him according to a federal court's 2009 decision in Kiyemba v. Obama [opinion, PDF; JURIST report].
Since the US Supreme Court's June 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. Bush [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that Guantanamo detainees could challenge their imprisonment in federal court through the use of habeas corpus motions, several detainees have done so, and many have been granted release. On Wednesday, the DC District Court unsealed an opinion issued last week denying [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] the habeas petition of another Yemeni detainee, Adham Mohammed Ali Awad. Although the petition was denied, the judge stated, "The case against Awad is gossamer thin. The evidence is of a kind fit only for these unique proceedings ... and has very little weight. In the end, however, it appears more likely than not, that Awad was, for some period of time, 'part of' al Qaeda." Last month, Guantanamo detainee Mohammed Jawad was ordered released [JURIST report] when a federal judge granted his habeas petition. Jawad's release came less than two weeks after the same judge ordered that all of Jawad's statements elicited by torture be suppressed [JURIST report]. Jawad faced charges of attempted murder [JURIST report] for a grenade attack on US soldiers in Kabul in 2002. Also last month, a federal judge ordered the release [JURIST report] of Kuwaiti Guantanamo Bay detainee Khaled Al-Mutairi.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ex-UBS banker sentenced to 40 months in prison for helping client hide assets
Matt Glenn on August 22, 2009 12:08 PM ET

[JURIST] Former UBS [corporate website] banker Bradley Birkenfeld was sentenced [press release] to 40 months in prison Friday for helping a client avoid paying over $7.2 million dollars in taxes. Birkenfeld admitted to helping a California real-estate developer hide $200 million to avoid paying taxes and has cooperated with the government in its investigation of employees of Swiss banks that the government says take advantage of Switzerland's strict confidentiality laws to help Americans hide money and avoid paying taxes. Birkenfeld, who was sentenced by Judge William Zloch in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida [official website], had hoped his cooperation would lead to a suspended sentence [SwissInfo report] while on Wednesday, prosecutors recommended [Miami Herald report] a 30-month sentence. The government may ask for a reduced sentence [Bloomberg report] as Birkenfeld continues to help the government in its investigation.
On Thursday, a Swiss lawyer and a Swiss banking executive were indicted [JURIST report] in the Southern District of Florida for allegedly helping clients hide assets. Earlier this week, the US government reached an agreement [JURIST report] with Switzerland that would grant the IRS access to information on thousands of Swiss bank accounts. As part of the agreement [text, PDF], the Swiss government will instruct banking giant UBS [corporate website] to begin to turn over information regarding certain anonymous bank accounts. In return, the US will cease unilateral efforts to seek account holder information, including withdrawing motions to enforce "John Doe" summons. In early May, the Obama administration announced revisions to the tax code [JURIST report] designed to curb overseas tax havens. One week earlier, the Swiss government filed an amicus curiae brief in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging that the attempt to obtain account holder information by the US violated Swiss national sovereignty [JURIST report]. Earlier this year, the Swiss announced their intention to adopt a more stringent definition [JURIST report] of tax evasion and to work with other countries to investigate such claims.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Second Circuit rules Yahoo Internet radio not subject to royalty fees
Amelia Mathias on August 22, 2009 11:03 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that Yahoo is not required to pay royalties for songs played over Internet radio. Several recording companies, all owned by Sony Corp, originally sued in 2001, claiming that Yahoo's online radio service, LAUNCHcast, was interactive, requiring the payment of royalty fees, because it allowed listeners to skip songs [NYT report]. The appeals court's decision upheld a 2007 lower court ruling in which a jury decided that skipping songs did not make the program interactive, finding:
In short, to the degree that LAUNCHcast's playlists are uniquely created for each user, that feature does not ensure predictability. Indeed, the unique nature of the playlist helps Launch ensure that it does not provide a service so specially created for the user that the user ceases to purchase music. LAUNCHcast listeners do not even enjoy the limited predictability that once graced the AM airwaves on weekends in America when "special requests" represented love-struck adolescents' attempts to communicate their feelings to "that special friend." Therefore, we cannot say LAUNCHcast falls within the scope of the DMCA's definition of an interactive service created for individual users.
It is unclear whether plaintiffs will appeal.
Friday's decision is the latest example of the recording industry attempting to regulate the way content is shared over the Internet. In July, Boston University graduate student Joel Tenenbaum was ordered to pay $675,000 in a file-sharing suit [JURIST report] brought against him by Warner Brothers. In the only other file-sharing case to go to trial, Jammie Thomas-Rasset was found liable and fined $192 million [JURIST report] last month. The suit against Tenenbaum may be the last to be brought to trial, as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) [organization website] in December decided to discontinue pursuing [JURIST report] those accused of illegal file-sharing in court. The RIAA has indicated that it will work with internet service providers to identify and then deny service to those who infringe copyrights. The RIAA has also sent letters [press release] to thousands of individuals with an offer to settle infringement claims out of court.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|