 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, July 21, 2009 |
 |
|


Sotomayor committee vote delayed a week by Senate Republicans
Jaclyn Belczyk on July 21, 2009 3:35 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] on Tuesday delayed a vote on the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor [WH profile; JURIST news archive] at the request of Senate Republicans. The vote on whether to send the nomination for consideration by the full Senate is now scheduled for July 28 [hearing notice]. Committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official website] said that he was "disappointed" by the delay, but that he remained confident Sotomayor would be confirmed [Washington Post report] and seated by the time the Court reconvenes for a special argument session on September 9. Also this week, Sotomayor returned responses to written questions [materials] from several Republican senators. Four Republican senators have declared their support for Sotomayor, and she is likely to be supported by all Senate Democrats.
Sotomayor faced questions from senators during last week's confirmation hearings [JURIST report]. Earlier this month, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary [association website] gave Sotomayor a unanimous "well-qualified" rating [letter, PDF; JURIST report]. In May, Obama praised [JURIST report] Sotomayor's experience and wisdom, rebuking Republicans who would oppose her confirmation. Obama warned against partisanship in the confirmation process, saying that he hoped Congress would "avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship" that marked past confirmation hearings. Obama nominated Sotomayor in May to replace retiring [JURIST reports] Justice David Souter [official profile, PDF; JURIST news archive].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

France lower house postpones vote on amended Internet piracy bill
Devin Montgomery on July 21, 2009 2:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The French National Assembly [official website] voted Tuesday to delay a vote [debate text, in French; materials, in French] on a new version [text, in French] of a controversial Internet piracy law, past its original July 24 date. The French Senate [official website, in French] approved [JURIST report] the law earlier this month after portions of its original version were rejected [decision, in French; JURIST report] in June by France's Constitutional Council [official website]. The original law subjected violators of copyright laws to suspension of Internet access at the discretion of a newly-created administrative authority bestowed with judicial power. The new law would leave discretion to suspend services to a judge, since the Constitutional Council ruled that the power to restrict the fundamental right of accessing the Internet should not be entrusted to an administrative authority. The determination to suspend access would be made on an infringer's third violation, after previously receiving two warnings. An Assembly vote on the measure is now likely [Reuters report] in September.
The bill, introduced by Cultural Minister Christine Albanel and supported by President Nicholas Sarkozy [official websites, in French], is aimed at reducing illegal downloads of protected works by proposing an escalating series of responses for users that are caught. The original version of the law was challenged [JURIST report] by the Socialist party on the grounds that it failed to find a balance between the rights of Internet users and those of copyright holders. In May, the original bill was approved by the National Assembly after initially defeating [JURIST reports] it in April. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry [organization website], representing the worldwide recording industry, has welcomed the legislation [press release], although it has been opposed [press release, in French] by French consumer interest group UFC-Que Choisir [advocacy website, in French] as well as cable and Internet providers [France 24 report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo closure reports delayed 6 months
Jaclyn Belczyk on July 21, 2009 9:51 AM ET

[JURIST] A report on the closure of the military prison at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive], due to be presented to US President Barack Obama [official website] Tuesday, will be delayed [press release, RTF] for six months, officials reported Monday. The government task force, assigned to create a new policy on terrorism detainees, missed its Tuesday deadline for a full report, instead presenting an interim report [text, PDF; prosecution protocol, PDF]. Another task force, appointed to review detainee interrogation policies, also missed the Tuesday deadline and received a two-month extension for its report. Despite the delay, White House officials said they remain confident that the facility will be shut down by January, in order to comply with Obama's executive order [text; JURIST report]. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] Executive Director Anthony Romero said:
The Obama administration must not slip into the same legal swamp that engulfed the Bush administration with its failed Guantanamo policies. Any effort to revamp the failed Guantanamo military commissions or enact a law to give any president the power to hold individuals indefinitely and without charge or trial is sure to be challenged in court and it will take years before justice is served. The only way to make good on President Obama's promise to shut down Guantanamo and end the military commissions is to charge and try the detainees in established federal criminal courts. Any effort to do otherwise will doom the Obama administration to lengthy litigation. A promise deferred could soon become a promise broken.
The delayed reports are the latest in a series of setbacks for Obama's plan to close the facility. Earlier this month, a former Guantanamo prosecutor told the House Judiciary Committee [official website] that the military commission system is "broken beyond repair" [JURIST report]. Also that week, a former US Navy Judge Advocate General [official website] told the Senate Armed Services Committee [official website] that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) [text, PDF] should be repealed rather than reformed [JURIST report]. In May, Obama announced [JURIST report] that he would use the controversial military commissions system to try some Guantanamo Bay detainees. The move drew criticism [JURIST report] from human rights groups, which called the plan "fatally flawed," continuing a long line of criticism of the commissions [JURIST report] for admitting some evidence that is barred from federal court, including hearsay or coerced confessions. Congress has also refused [JURIST report] Obama's requests for funding to close the facility because there is no firm plan in place.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia eases restrictions on non-governmental organizations
Devin Montgomery on July 21, 2009 9:18 AM ET

[JURIST] Russian President Dmitry Medvedev [official profile] on Monday approved amendments [text, in Russian; summary, in Russian] to the country's law that regulates non-governmental organizations (NGOs), loosening and simplifying registration requirements for the groups. The amendments eased reporting and auditing requirements on the groups and eliminated a requirement that the groups prove they are not a threat to the Russian state or identity. The amendments passed both houses of the Russian parliament earlier this month after being introduced [statement text] by Medvedev on the June recommendation of the Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights Council [official website]. They are part of a longer-term plan [text] recommended by the council to improve the government's stance towards the groups, and Medvedev has said he sees the changes as important ones:
In my view this represents quite an important change in the law on public associations, including non-governmental organisations. I think this draft law is a good idea and I am submitting it to the State Duma today for consideration. But it makes sense that the working group represented here today should go on working on the modernisation of legislation in this area and the general development of civil society, since modernising the legislation and monitoring -- public monitoring of its implementation -- would in my view also be useful. It is not only the prosecutor's office that should follow up on this, but as representatives of public associations you should be involved as well.
Former president Vladimir Putin [JURIST news archive] signed [JURIST report] the original regulations into law in 2006 after "color revolutions" in Georgia and the Ukraine, which were seen as having been driven primarily by foreign-funded NGOs. That law received wide criticism [JURIST report] and Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] had reported [text, PDF; press release] that it exceeded the scope of permitted state NGO regulation and violated international law because it "grant[ed] officials excessive powers to interfere in the founding and operation of NGOs."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge finds CIA committed fraud, orders documents unsealed
Jay Carmella on July 21, 2009 7:43 AM ET

[JURIST] Chief judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] Royce Lamberth found [opinion, PDF] Monday that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] committed fraud in its efforts to keep documents related to eavesdropping allegations a secret. The judge ruled that the CIA must unseal more than 200 documents relating to the case. Lamberth is also considering charges [AP report] against 6 other CIA members, including former CIA director George Tenet [BBC Profile]. The judge wrote:
Although this case has been sealed since its inception to protect sensitive information, it is clear from reading the Court of Appeals 2007 public opinion in this case and seeing the unclassified appendix that was filed on appeal that many of the issues are unclassified. The government acknowledged that indeed, the case could be unsealed, and that much of the information is unclassified. Accordingly, the Court ordered the government to file with the Court unclassified versions of every document in the case.
The lawsuit began in 1994, after former Drug Enforcement Agency [official website] agent Richard Horn felt that his was he being spied on by his superiors in Myanmar. Until recently, the CIA had requested the documents remain sealed in order to protect the agents in the field.
CIA tactics came under fire last week as the US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee [official website] announced [JURIST report] it will launch an investigation into plans to assassinate al Qaeda members. The Committee has already requested documents [Washington Post report] from the CIA and will likely hold hearings. The Committee hopes to learn whether former vice president Dick Cheney told the CIA to hide the program from Congress as media reports alleged [NYT report; JURIST report] last week. Former Bush administration officials have defended the decision not to reveal the program to Congress on the grounds that the program was only in the planning phase and not yet fully developed.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|