Red Cross report says Guantanamo doctors violated medical ethics

[JURIST] Medical professionals violated codes of medical ethics by participating in and assisting in ill-treatment of Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees, says a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross [official website], made public Monday. The report [text, PDF], which was written in 2007 based on interviews of fourteen detainees, alleges that doctors and psychologists in Guantanamo at times stopped waterboarding and other forms of ill-treatment, and at other times modified the severity of the treatment to allow it to continue. The portion of the report on the role of medical professionals concludes:

any interrogation process that requires a health professional to either pronounce on the subject’s fitness to withstand such a procedure, or which requires a health professional to monitor the actual procedure, must have inherent health risks. As such, the interrogation process is contrary to international law and the participation of health personnel in such a process is contrary to international standards of medical ethics. In the case of the alleged participation of health personnel in the detention and interrogation of the fourteen detainees, their primary purpose appears to have been to serve the interrogation process, and not the patient. In so doing the health personnel have condoned and participated in ill- treatment.
Even though the intention of the medical professionals was to stop lasting damage, the report claims their actions should be considered a violation of medical ethics, which call for both the patients and the practitioners to be treated with dignity and respect [NYT report]. The report, news of which was leaked to the press in March, also deemed the tactics of the CIA to be torture [JURIST report].

This report is the latest incident in a long string of medical condemnations of Guantanamo Bay and the medical professionals working in it. In September 2007, doctors from 16 countries wrote a letter [JURIST report] condemning the US military for its treatment of detainees, particularly the policy of force-feeding to counteract hunger strikes. A month earlier, a commentary [text] published in the Journal of the American Medical Association [journal website] asserted that force-feeding was a violation of medical ethics [JURIST report]. In 2006, Saifullah Paracha, a Pakistani detainee, was not permitted [JURIST report] to have his cardiac catheterization moved from Guantanamo Bay to a more extensive medical facility in the US or Pakistan.


 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.