 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, February 5, 2009 |
 |
|


CIA director nominee Panetta pledges agency will 'perform according to law'
Jaclyn Belczyk on February 5, 2009 4:25 PM ET

[JURIST] Nominee for director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] Leon Panetta [profile] testified [testimony, PDF; materials] Thursday before the US Senate Intelligence Committee [official website] that he would perform his duties according to the law while upholding the Constitution. Panetta said: I believe the Director should be responsible for shaping the role of CIA in the twenty-first century to protect this nation, to provide credible and accurate intelligence to policy makers, to undertake those missions that will enhance our security, and to always perform our responsibilities according to the law and our Constitution. Panetta also promised to build a strong relationship between the CIA and Congress. After several hours of questioning, the committee recessed and will reconvene Friday morning at 10:00 AM.
President Barack Obama [official profile] nominated [JURIST report] Panetta to lead the CIA last month. Panetta has served as a Congressman, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) [official website] Director, and White House Chief of Staff. Panetta will replace current CIA director Michael Hayden [JURIST news archive], who has agreed to stay on [press release] and cooperate fully until the transition is complete. Last month, Admiral Dennis Blair, nominated [press release] by Obama for Director of National Intelligence, stressed his respect for civil liberties and lawfulness [JURIST report] in intelligence investigations during testimony [text, PDF] before the Intelligence Committee.
4:45 PM ET - In questioning late this afternoon, Panetta said that the CIA will not conduct [AP report] the same type of extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive] seen under the Bush administration. Panetta also testified that he does not believe interrogators should be prosecuted for harsh interrogation techniques used during the Bush administration and that he is open to using more aggressive interrogation techniques [NYT report] than those previously authorized by Obama.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ginsburg undergoes surgery for pancreatic cancer
Andrew Gilmore on February 5, 2009 2:20 PM ET

[JURIST] US Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg [official biography, PDF] underwent surgery [press release] Thursday in New York for pancreatic cancer [Mayo Clinic backgrounder]. Ginsburg, 75, is expected to remain at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center [official website] in New York, where the surgery was performed, for seven to 10 days before being released. According to the Supreme Court, Ginsburg had no symptoms of the disease before it was discovered during a routine physical examination in late January. Pancreatic cancer has a low survival rate upon diagnosis, but early discovery and treatment of the condition can improve the patient's prognosis. Ginsburg was diagnosed and treated with radiation and chemotherapy for rectal cancer [AP report] in 1999.
News of Ginsburg's illness comes during a period of heightened speculation over the future ideological direction of the Supreme Court during the administration of President Barack Obama [official profile]. In a recent column for the website Slate, senior editor Dahlia Lithwick called for [Slate op-ed] the appointment of a liberal justice in the mold of conservative Associate Justice Antonin Scalia [official biography, PDF]. In a recent article, Adam Liptak of the New York Times discussed the possible decisions [NYT report] facing Obama with respect to the aging so-called "liberal wing" of the Supreme Court, including Ginsburg, Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, and Associate Justice Stephen Breyer [official profiles, PDF].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Taiwan ex-president's associates plead guilty to corruption charges
Safiya Boucaud on February 5, 2009 11:52 AM ET

[JURIST] The sister-in-law of embattled former Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian [BBC profile, JURIST news archive] on Thursday entered a guilty plea at the Taipei District Court on charges of money laundering related to a corruption scandal surrounding the former leader and his associates. Chen Chun-ying admitted she had forged documents and transferred money to bank accounts upon orders from Chen Shui-bian and his wife, claiming that she did not know the money was illegally obtained and did not profit from the transfer. Businessman Kuo Chuan-ching also pleaded guilty to paying $2.7 million in kickbacks in exchange for a building contract. Kuo is expected to serve as a witness for the prosecution [Taiwan News report]. Prosecutors reportedly rejected Chen Chun-ying's request to plea bargain due to ongoing investigations in the scandal.
Chen Chun-ying is the fourth family member to enter guilty pleas for their roles in the scandal. The former president was indicted [JURIST report] last year by Taiwanese prosecutors on charges including embezzlement, receiving bribes, forgery, and money laundering. His wife, his son and daughter-in-law, three former presidential aides, and eight other associates and family members have also been indicted. Chen Shui-bian has been detained since his November arrest [JURIST report] on suspicion of embezzling money from the state affairs fund. Last month, Taiwan's High Court [official website] rejected [JURIST report] Shui-bian's appeal protesting the court's previous decision to detain him [JURIST report] while he awaits trial on corruption charges.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China again calls for return of Uighur Guantanamo detainees
Steve Czajkowski on February 5, 2009 10:03 AM ET

[JURIST] China reiterated its request Thursday that all Chinese Muslims, or Uighurs, held at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] be returned to China [press release, in Mandarin] after the prison's closing. Spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry [official website, in Mandarin] Jiang Yu [official profile] said that China objects to other countries accepting any one of the 17 detainees and that international law dictates they be sent back. The statement comes just two days after three Uighurs sought refugee status in Canada [JURIST report], but it is not clear whether they will be accepted [Reuters report]. China maintains the detainees should be brought back to face charges that they are members of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], a militant group calling for separation from China and designated a terrorist group by the United States for suspected ties to al Qaeda. The US government has been hesitant to release the Uighurs back to China, fearing they will tortured upon their return.
In July, China reportedly executed two Uighurs [JURIST report] alleged to be members of the ETIM. Thirteen other Uighurs were given jail terms ranging from ten years to life imprisonment. In 2006, China criticized the US for releasing five Uighurs to Albania [JURIST reports], where officials reviewed their applications for asylum. In 2005, a US district judge ruled [JURIST report] that two Uighurs at Guantanamo Bay could be detained indefinitely even though their imprisonment was unlawful because they could face death or torture in China. The US State Department has said the Uighurs are among detainees who will be released [JURIST report] once the US receives assurances that they will not be persecuted in their home countries or finds other countries willing to accept them.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK foreign minister denies court claim that US threatened to withhold intelligence
Jaclyn Belczyk on February 5, 2009 8:31 AM ET

[JURIST] UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs David Miliband [official profile] told members of Parliament Thursday that the US did not threaten to withhold intelligence [FCO press release] if a summary of the alleged torture of Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Binyam Mohamed [Reprieve profile; JURIST news archive] was made public. Miliband's statement was in response to a judgment [text, PDF; JURIST report] issued by the London High Court Wednesday, in which Lord Justice Thomas and Mr. Justice Lloyd Jones wrote that the US threatened to reconsider or end intelligence-sharing with the UK. Miliband said: It therefore was and remains my judgment that the disclosure of the intelligence documents at issue by order of our courts against the wishes of the US authorities would indeed cause real and significant damage to the national security and international relations of this country. For the record, the United States authorities did not threaten to "break off" intelligence cooperation with the UK. What the United States said, and it appears in the open, public documents of this case, is that the disclosure of these documents by order of our Courts would be "likely to result in serious damage to US national security and could harm existing intelligence information-sharing between our two governments." Thats a simple affirmation of the facts of intelligence cooperation. Miliband concluded his remarks by saying that there was "no prejudice" to Mohamad's case as a result of Wednesday's judgment.
At issue in Mohamad's case were a number of paragraphs describing the conditions and circumstances of his imprisonment, redacted from the High Court's judgment in its August 2008 ruling [JURIST report] that the UK Foreign Office must turn over evidence essential to Mohamed's defense. Mohamed asserts that after he was arrested in Pakistan and turned over to US officials, he was then transferred to Moroccan agents who tortured him. He was later transferred to Guantanamo Bay in 2004. In December, he asked the UK government [letter, DOC; JURIST report] to ensure that photographic evidence of his alleged torture be preserved. For most of 2007, Binyam was one of five UK residents detained at Guantanamo Bay. Three of those were released [DOD press release; JURIST report] from US custody in December. The official status of a fourth detainee remains unclear.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Military commissions review court grants government continuance in Jawad case
Christian Ehret on February 5, 2009 8:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Military Commission Review (USCMCR) [official website] on Wednesday granted [order, PDF] a government request [motion, PDF] for a 120-day continuance on an intermediate appeal in its case against Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Mohammed Jawad [DOD materials; JURIST news archive]. The government asked the court to grant the continuance in light of an executive order [JURIST report] by President Barack Obama [official website] requiring a review of the military commission [JURIST news archive] system, arguing that proceeding with the case would be futile until the review is complete. Lawyers for Jawad opposed [text, PDF] the continuance, arguing that the USCMCR lacked authority to grant the motion, and that any likely changes to the military commission system would not favor the government's position. Siding with the government, the court reasoned that it ought to grant deference to the government given national security and foreign policy concerns: [T]he reason for the delay is to allow the Department of Defense to participate in an Interagency review, not only of the military commission process, but also the status of those apprehended and presently detained at Guantanamo Bay - including the Appellee - their conditions, and the factual and legal bases for their apprehension and detention, all in the context of the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. The government is appealing an earlier decision [JURIST report] by a military judge to exclude a confession by Jawad on the grounds that it was solicited through the use of torture.
Jawad's trial was initially delayed [JURIST report] in December to give prosecutors more time to appeal the exclusion of his confession. In January, the USCMCR heard arguments [JURIST report] regarding the exclusion. Jawad has been charged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] with attempted murder and intentionally causing serious bodily injury for his alleged role in a December 2002 grenade attack in Kabul that injured two US soldiers and an Afghan translator. In May 2008, Jawad moved [JURIST report] to have all charges against him dismissed, alleging that he has been tortured in US custody and subjected to the so-called "frequent-flier program," in which certain inmates are moved between cells at two to four hour intervals in an attempt to cause physical stress through sleep deprivation.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|