JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Tuesday, February 3, 2009




AG Holder pledges to restore credibility to DOJ at swearing-in ceremony
Andrew Morgan on February 3, 2009 4:52 PM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Eric Holder [official profile] Tuesday expressed his commitment to restoring a tradition of fairness and political neutrality [prepared remarks] to the Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website]. In video remarks to DOJ employees delivered after he was sworn in [WH press release] by Vice President Joe Biden [official profile], Holder said:

there shall be no place for political favoritism, no reason to be timid in enforcing the laws that protect our rights, our environment and our principles as long as I have the opportunity to lead this great Department. This may be a break from the immediate past but it is consistent with the long history of the Department of Justice. I call on every employee of this Department - from this moment on - to return to the practices that are the foundation of this entity. It is time once again to base our actions on policies that are rooted in fairness and in a desire to ensure a more just America


Holder's remarks Tuesday echo pledges [text] he made during his confirmation hearings with the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] in January to "restore the credibility of a Department badly shaken by allegations of improper political interference" and "reinvigorate the traditional missions of the Justice Department ... [of] fighting crime, protecting civil rights, preserving the environment and ensuring the fairness of the marketplace."

On Monday, the Senate [official website] voted 75-21 to confirm [JURIST report] Holder as attorney general. Last month, during confirmation hearings [transcript] with the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website], Holder testified [JURIST report] that he believes waterboarding [JURIST news archive] constitutes torture. Then-President-elect Barack Obama officially announced his nomination of Holder [JURIST report] in December. Holder served as Deputy US Attorney General [archive materials] during the Clinton administration. Holder has been criticized [JURIST report] for his role in the 2001 pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich [Time backgrounder].





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Australia court rejects accused Serb war criminal extradition appeal
Andrew Morgan on February 3, 2009 3:47 PM ET

[JURIST] The Australian Federal Court [official website] Tuesday dismissed [judgment text] the application of former Serbian paramilitary commander Dragan Vasiljkovic [Trial Watch backgrounder] for review of a 2007 extradition order [JURIST report] that he be handed over to Croatian authorities. Vasiljkovic, also known as Daniel Snedden, is accused of war crimes in connection with his treatment of Croatian prisoners during the 1991-1995 War of Independence [GlobalSecurity backgrounder]. Justice Dennis Cowdroy [official profile] rejected Vasiljkovic's arguments that he would not be afforded a fair trial in Croatia:

The Court ... finds that there is no specific evidence of pre-trial bias against the applicant, nor is there a nexus established between the applicant’s apprehension and the question of whether he would be prejudiced at his trial. Further, the evidence before the Court establishes that the Croatian judiciary is capable of providing a fair trial to the applicant.
Cowdroy also found that there is no requirement for a jury trial under Section 80 of the Australian Constitution [texts], nor was the delay between the offenses and extradition an abuse of process, since Vasiljkovic would be tried in Croatia, and not in Australia.

Vasiljkovic was arrested [JURIST report] in Australia in 2006 at Croatia's request. In 2007, a lower Australian court ordered that he be handed over to Croatian authorities pursuant to their extradition request. Vasiljkovic moved to Australia in 1969 at the age of 15 and became an Australian citizen before returning to Serbia to participate in the conflict. A former prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [official website; JURIST news archive] accused Australia in 2005 of becoming a safe haven [JURIST report] for war criminals.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


ICJ rules for Romania in underwater oil reserves dispute with Ukraine
Jake Oresick on February 3, 2009 12:48 PM ET

[JURIST] The International Court of Justice (ICJ) [official website; JURIST news archive] resolved a long-standing dispute [ICJ materials] between Ukraine and Romania Tuesday by drawing a new maritime border [judgment, PDF] between the countries, giving Romania four-fifths of waters believed to sit atop a sizable crude oil reserve. At issue was whether Ukraine's claim to Serpent Island - a small, X-shaped limestone formation - gave it territorial rights over the surrounding waters. The court's 15 judges unanimously approved the new boundaries. Romanian President Traian Basescu praised [HotNews report] the court's ruling, calling it a victory for Romania's Foreign Affairs Ministry. The Ukrainian presidential secretariat said the decision was a positive step [Kyiv Post report] toward cooperation between the two states. The decision is final and cannot be appealed.

Romania initially filed suit in the ICJ [JURIST report] in 2004 after years of unsuccessful attempts to resolve the matter diplomatically. The ICJ began hearing the case [JURIST report] in September 2008, in which Romania argued Ukraine's claims to Serpent Island were illegitimate, as it inherited the territory from the Soviet Union, which annexed it illegally. Ukraine contended the island is currently occupied by military personnel and scientists, although Romania claimed the activity recent and an attempt to influence the court's decision. Tuesday's decision may be seen as a step toward energy independence for Ukraine, which has recently been in a dispute [BBC profile] with Russia over gas supplies.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Australia court sentences Algerian cleric convicted of plotting terrorist attacks
Jake Oresick on February 3, 2009 12:10 PM ET

[JURIST] Australia's Supreme Court of Victoria [official website] Tuesday sentenced Algerian cleric [sentencing remarks] Abdul Nacer Benbrika [BBC profile], also known as Abu Bakr, to at least 12 years in prison for his role in plotting large-scale terror attacks aimed at sporting venues and railway stations in Australia. Benrika received a prison sentence of 12 to 15 years after being convicted [JURIST report] on charges [charge list] of directing the activities of a terrorist organization, being a member of a terrorist organization, and possessing a compact disc connected with the preparation of a terrorist attack. In dismissing defense counsel's argument that Benbrika's leadership was tenuous, Justice Bernard Bongiorno wrote:

His leadership may have been less than what would have been expected had he been a trained soldier or even a trained terrorist, and his and his followers’ capacity to carry out a terrorist act may have been less than professional. They may never have got to the point of carrying out a terrorist act. But all of these considerations are of little moment. By its existence, its nature and its activities the organisation fostered and encouraged its members to engage in violent jihad — to perform a terrorist act. By its collection and circulation of terrorist material it prepared, however indirectly, the doing of a terrorist act. These constitute the substance of the criminality in this case.
Six other men also received prison sentences [Age report] of between four-and-a-half and seven-and-a-half years on Monday for their roles in the plot.

Benbrika was one of six men convicted on terrorism charges in September 2008. Benbrika and 12 others were arrested after the Australian Parliament [official website] passed emergency anti-terror legislation [JURIST report] allowing authorities to prosecute suspects without connecting them to a specific threat. Opponents have criticized the expanded prosecutorial powers included in the legislation, arguing that they threaten civil liberties [HRW press release].





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Guantanamo Uighur detainees seek asylum in Canada
Safiya Boucaud on February 3, 2009 12:02 PM ET

[JURIST] Six detainees from the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] military prison, including three Uighurs, are seeking refugee status in Canada with the support of Canadian sponsors. The Uighurs were last year deemed [Kiyemba v. Bush backgrounder; JURIST report] not to be unlawful enemy combatants [10 U.S.C. § 948a text; JURIST news archive]. Lawyers for the men have said that US authorities have admitted the men were mistakenly picked up, and are ideal candidates for refugee status in Canada. They also have said that the men will face torture or even death if they are allowed to return to China.

The three Uighur detainees are part of a group of 17 whom the US government have determined are not unlawful enemy combatants. They had initially been linked with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], a militant group that seeks to secede from China, and has been designated a terrorist group by the US since 2002. In October, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ordered the release of the detainees [opinion and order, PDF], writing that the Constitution prohibits detention without cause and that the individual right to freedom outweighs the other governmental branches' right to deny entry to aliens. Judges for the DC circuit court stayed the order [order, PDF; JURIST report] later that month pending appeal. In November, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit [official website] heard oral arguments [JURIST report] on whether the Uighur detainees can be released into the US. China has renewed its demand [JURIST report] for the Uighurs to be repatriated to face charges there.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Liberia ex-president Taylor verdict expected in 2010: SCSL prosecutor
Jay Carmella on February 3, 2009 10:22 AM ET

[JURIST] Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) [official website; JURIST news archive] prosecutor Stephen Rapp [official profile] said Monday that a verdict in the war crimes case against former Liberian President Charles Taylor [case materials; JURIST news archive] is expected in early 2010. Rapp said that the last of the prosecution's 91 witnesses was called last Friday and that the trial will likely remain in recess until April, when the defense will begin calling witnesses. Taylor has pleaded not guilty to all 11 counts [indictment, PDF] of crimes against humanity, violations of the Geneva Conventions [materials], and other violations of international humanitarian law.

Taylor is generally deemed responsible for leading and funding civil wars in Liberia and neighboring Sierra Leone. He has previously complained that his single court-appointed defense lawyer was unfairly outnumbered [JURIST report] by the prosecution team. The criticism prompted the SCSL to add four people to Taylor's defense team and increase funding available to Taylor [JURIST report] to approximately $100,000 per month, despite a UN report that concluded Taylor may control millions of dollars [JURIST report] held in bank accounts worldwide. It was later determined that Taylor held $5 billion in two US banks [JURIST report] during his presidency. His trial began in Sierra Leone, but has been moved to The Hague [JURIST report] for security reasons. Last month, Taylor's son was sentenced to 97 years [JURIST report] in a US prison for committing torture in Liberia.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Cuba rights group reports drop in number of political prisoners
Jay Carmella on February 3, 2009 8:30 AM ET

[JURIST] The number of political prisoners in Cuba [JURIST news archive] has declined from 234 in January 2008 to 205, while the number of brief detentions has increased, according to the Cuban Commission on Human Rights and National Reconciliation (CCDHRN) [El Pais backgrounder, in Spanish] Monday. The CCDHRN report attributed the decline in the number of political prisoners [AP report] to the lack of extended prison terms for those arrested, which was the custom until 2003. Despite the decrease in political prisoners, the country has experienced a significant rise in the number activists that are briefly detained by the government. In 2008, more than 1,500 activists were arbitrarily detained for a short period of time. The CCDHRN, led by Cuban human rights activist Elizardo Sanchez, is the only independent source of information regarding political arrests in Cuba. The group is considered illegal by the Cuban government, but its existence and operation is tolerated by the regime. The Cuban government officially denies the existence of political prisoners.

Last month, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] released its 2009 report [report, text] on Cuba. The report acknowledged some attempts in 2008 by the country to improve its position on human rights, but overall the Cuban government continues to deny its citizens their fundamental rights. In October, Cuba was ranked 169th in the seventh annual Worldwide Index of Freedom [JURIST report] issued by Reporters Without Borders (RWB) [advocacy website; JURIST news archive]. In December 2007, Cuba agreed to sign an international human rights pact [JURIST report] and to allow UN human rights of observers into the country beginning this year. The government signed the treaties [JURIST report] in February of 2008. Last year, the CCDHRN reported that the number of political prisoners in Cuba had decreased [JURIST report] from 283 at the end of 2006 to to 234 at the end of 2007, but human rights abuses continued in the communist Caribbean state.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


African Union to seek delay of Bashir ICC indictment
Andrew Gilmore on February 3, 2009 7:51 AM ET

[JURIST] The African Union (AU) [official website] agreed Monday to seek a postponement of the pending International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] indictment against Sudan President Omar al-Bashir [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], citing concerns over a possible threat to the peace process in Sudan. Meeting at the 12th African Union Summit [official website] in Addis Ababa, Ethiopa, the AU's Peace and Security Council [official website] agreed to lobby the ICC for a one-year suspension of the case [AFP report]. AU Commission Chairman Jean Ping expressed concern over the fact that ICC cases have been confined to the adjudication of war crimes and crimes against humanity only in African conflicts [Sudan Tribune report].

ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo [offical profile] applied for an arrest warrant for Bashir [JURIST report] in July, charging him with genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The warrant was condemned [JURIST report] by the Arab League [official website, in Arabic] and criticized [JURIST report] by South African President Thabo Mbeki [official profile]. In December, ICC judges gave Moreno-Ocampo until January 26 to provide supplemental information [JURIST report] about a September 2007 attack [BBC report] on an African Union [official website] base in Haskanita. The events at the ICC were preceded by a Security Council statement in June urging Sudan to work with the ICC [JURIST report] to "put an end to impunity for the crimes committed in Darfur." Sudan is not a party to the ICC, but must cooperate to fulfill its obligations under Council Resolution 1593 [text], which established jurisdiction over the Darfur situation. Hundreds of thousands of people have allegedly been killed in Darfur by Sudanese military and janjaweed [Slate backgrounder] militia forces.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Canada meatpacker settles class action suit over bacteria tainting that killed 20
Andrew Gilmore on February 3, 2009 6:34 AM ET

[JURIST] Canadian meat producer Maple Leaf Foods [corporate website] announced Monday that it had reached a proposed settlement agreement [notice of proposed settlement, PDF] with class action plaintiffs who brought suit against the company [class action website] in connection with sales of meat tainted with listeria monocytogenes [CDC backgrounder], which sickened 56 Canadians and caused 20 deaths across the country in 2008. Under the proposed settlement, Maple Leaf Foods will pay between $25-$27 million to settle the claims of class members who submit to the settlement agreement:

The Settlement provides for the creation of a $25 million (CDN) settlement fund (Settlement Fund) from which eligible consumers and/or their family members may receive varying levels of compensation. Notice costs, administration costs, and class counsel fees and disbursements as more particularly described below will also be paid out of the Settlement Fund. The Defendants will also pay up to a further $2 million (CDN) if the Settlement Fund is insufficient to fully compensate all eligible claims. The amount each claimant will receive depends upon the severity of their illness. For claimants who sustained physical symptoms consistent with Listeriosis, the compensation ranges from $750 (for physical symptoms lasting between 24-48 hours) up to $125,000 (for serious and long lasting physical injuries). The estates of Class Members who died as a result of symptoms consistent with Listeriosis will be paid $120,000, plus additional substantial amounts to immediate family members.
The proposed settlement agreement must be approved by Canadian courts in several provinces. Hearings on the proposed settlement will be held [CBC report] on March 5 in Ontario, March 10 in Saskatchewan, and March 20 in Quebec.

Last year's outbreak of listeriosis was traced [PHAC press release] to a Maple Leaf Foods processing plant near Toronto, Ontario. The plant was shut down in August [Vancouver Sun report], and is now running at limited production levels. The bacterial infection was spread through several products, which were promptly recalled [recall list, PDF] by the company. In response to the listeriosis outbreak, Maple Leaf Foods developed an action plan to ensure the ongoing safety of its products, including so-called "enhanced food safety protocols" [text].





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org