JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Thursday, January 22, 2009

Child Online Protection Act dead after high court declines to hear DOJ appeal
Steve Czajkowski at 10:27 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday ended a decade-long battle by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] to have the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 (COPA) [text] declared constitutional by denying certiorari [order list, PDF] in the case of Mukasey v. ACLU [docket; cert. petition, PDF]. By denying review, the Court has decided that the law, which imposes civil and criminal penalties on website operators for making sexually explicit materials available to minors over the Internet, will not be enforced. Free speech advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website], lauded [press release] the Court's decision. Chris Hansen, the ACLU's lead counsel on the case, said:

For over a decade the government has been trying to thwart freedom of speech on the Internet, and for years the courts have been finding the attempts unconstitutional. It is not the role of the government to decide what people can see and do on the Internet. Those are personal decisions that should be made by individuals and their families.
The Court rejected the case without comment.

COPA was enacted in 1998 after similar provisions contained in the Communications Decency Act (CDA) [text] were struck down by the Court in Reno v. ACLU [text] as unconstitutional because the law was not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest and because less restrictive alternatives were available. In 2004, the Court upheld [JURIST report] an temporary injunction against enforcing the law, ruling that is was probably unconstitutional. The ACLU began its lawsuit [JURIST report] in 2006 and in March 2007 a federal judge for in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted a permanent injunction [decision, PDF; JURIST report] against enforcement of COPA. That decision that was affirmed [decision, PDF; JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in July 2007. COPA was never enforced since its inception in 1998.





Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Bosnia court orders release of president
1:32 PM ET, May 25

 Puerto Rico lawmakers approve gender, sexual orientation discrimination law
12:26 PM ET, May 25

 UN rights experts urge stronger legislation against caste-based discrimination
11:56 AM ET, May 25

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org