 |
|

Legal news from Monday, November 24, 2008 |
 |
|


DC Circuit hears Uighur release appeal
Deirdre Jurand on November 24, 2008 9:19 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit [official website] heard oral arguments Monday on whether 17 Uighur detainees at Guantanamo Bay [Kiyemba v. Bush backgrounder and materials] can be released into the US. In early October, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ordered the release of the detainees [opinion and order, PDF; JURIST report], writing that the Constitution prohibits detention without cause and that the individual right to freedom outweighs the other governmental branches' right to deny entry to aliens. Judges for the DC circuit court stayed the order [order, PDF; JURIST report] later that month pending appeal. The government argued [appeal brief, PDF] Monday that the exclusion of aliens from the country is not a judicial government function and that the detainees have no statutory or constitutional right to enter the US, while lawyers for the detainees argued [response brief, PDF] that the executive branch cannot exclude the detainees and that US immigration law does not prevent release. SCOTUSblog has more.
The US government has determined that the Uighurs are not unlawful enemy combatants [10 U.S.C. § 948a text; JURIST news archive], but it has linked them with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) [CFR backgrounder], a militant group that calls for separation from China and has been a US-designated terrorist group since 2002. China has renewed its demand [JURIST report] for the Uighurs to be repatriated, and in October, Chinese authorities called on other nations [Guardian report] to arrest and extradite eight alleged ETIM members whom they suspected of plotting to attack the Olympic Games this past summer in Beijing.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Germany court grants parole to former Red Army Faction leader
Jake Oresick on November 24, 2008 4:14 PM ET

[JURIST] A Stuttgart court on Monday granted parole for Christian Klar, a leader of the militant Red Army Faction (RAF) [advocacy website], after Klar served 26 years in prison on nine counts of murder and 11 counts of attempted murder. The court found no grounds [BBC report] on which continue to detain him, and Klar will be released in January. The RAF, commonly known as the Baader-Meinhof Gang [BBC backgrounder], was a leftist group that targeted political and financial institutions and personnel, killing 34 people between 1968 and 1998. Among Klar's victims were a federal prosecutor and the head of the Dresdner Bank [corporate website]. Klar, whom the court no longer considers dangerous, will remain on parole for five years. Der Spiegel has local coverage.
In 2007, Klar called for the defeat of capitalism [Der Spiegel report] one month before appealing for clemency. The statement created intense political pressure that ultimately forced [Der Spiegel report] German President Horst Kohler [official website] to deny him clemency [JURIST report]. Other prominent RAF members, including Brigitte Mohnhaupt and Eve Haule [JURIST reports], have also been paroled in recent years.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Second Circuit upholds convictions in 1998 US embassy bombings
Tere Miller-Sporrer on November 24, 2008 3:40 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] on Monday upheld [opinion, PDF] the convictions of three men found guilty of involvement in the 1998 bombing of two US embassies [State Department backgrounder] in Tanzania and Kenya. The court held that Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, and Wadih El Hage [GlobalSecurity profiles] had received fair trials, and that none of the US government's actions against the men constituted violations of their constitutional rights. In a separate opinion [PDF text] addressing what the judges said was a novel question, the court rejected El Hage's claim that evidence against him obtained through warrantless overseas searches should be excluded, holding that such searches need only be reasonable to satisfy Fourth Amendment [LII backgrounder] requirements: First, there is nothing in our history or our precedents suggesting that U.S. officials must first obtain a warrant before conducting an overseas search...
Second, nothing in the history of the foreign relations of the United States would require that U.S. officials obtain warrants from foreign magistrates before conducting searches overseas or, indeed, to suppose that all other states have search and investigation rules akin to our own...
Third, if U.S. judicial officers were to issue search warrants intended to have extraterritorial effect, such warrants would have dubious legal significance, if any, in a foreign nation...
Fourth and finally, it is by no means clear that U.S. judicial officers could be authorized to issue warrants for overseas searches, although we need not resolve that issue here.
For these reasons, we hold that the Fourth Amendments Warrant Clause has no extraterritorial application and that foreign searches of U.S. citizens conducted by U.S. agents are subject only to the Fourth Amendments requirement of reasonableness. [citations omitted] In a third opinion [PDF text], the court rejected Fifth Amendment [LII backgrounder] claims by Odeh and Al-Owhail holding that an "advice of rights" form given to the defendants combined with oral statements made by prosecutors were sufficient to satisfy the amendment's protections against involuntary confessions. The court also rejected Sixth Amendment [LII backgrounder] claims by the men, holding that a lower court's denial of defense council requests did not constitute deprivation of council. The court did, however, order the resentencing of El Hage because his original sentence was based on federal mandatory sentencing guidelines invalidated [JURIST report] by the US Supreme Court in 2005.
In March, the US also charged [JURIST report; charge sheet, PDF] Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani [BBC profile] with several terrorism-related counts for his alleged involvement in the bombings. In 2005, Kenya dropped charges [JURIST report] against three other men charged in connection with the attack in Nairobi that killed 224 people.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Felons seeking pardons before Bush leaves office: report
Christian Ehret on November 24, 2008 1:43 PM ET

[JURIST] Many convicted felons, including several well-known figures, are seeking clemency from US President George W. Bush before he leaves office, according to a Washington Post report Monday. Among those said to have applied are financier Michael Milken [Forbes profile; personal website], former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham [JURIST report] and former Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards [official profile]. Presidential pardons are granted under Article II section 2 [text] of the US Constitution which gives the president the "power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment." The US Department of Justice Office of the Pardon Attorney [official website] accepts clemency applications for Presidential review and determines if the applicants meet the necessary requirements [Executive Clemency Rules, text].
Bush has so far granted [DOJ statistics, JURIST report] 157 applications for clemency during his term in office. In an controversial move [JURIST backgrounder], former President Bill Clinton granted pardons [materials] or sentence commutations to his brother Roger Clinton, Whitewater partner Susan McDougal, business partners Marc Rich and Pincus Green, former Director of Central Intelligence John Deutch and 135 others [AP report] just before leaving office in January 2001.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bolivia president lifts martial law in northern province on last day set by court
Ximena Marinero on November 24, 2008 12:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Bolivian President Evo Morales [official website, in Spanish; JURIST news archive] on Sunday lifted martial law over the the country's northern province of Pando [government website, in Spanish], more than two months after the sanction was imposed following violent regional protests against the country's proposed new constitution [PDF text; JURIST report]. Under the proposed charter, more of Bolivia's land and energy resource income would go to the country's indigenous population, but Pando is one of nine provinces that has objected to the changes, instead voting for increased regional autonomy [JURIST reports] from the central government. Earlier this month, the Bolivian National Electoral Court [official website] warned that Bolivian law requires that there be no restrictions on civil liberties during campaigning for a national vote, and set Sunday as the last day [ABI report] to lift martial law in the region in order for a national referendum on the proposed constitution to be held as scheduled on January 25.
In September, the governor of Pando was arrested on genocide charges [JURIST report] for the deaths of Morales supporters that resulted from the protests in the region. Local reports indicate there is still a strong military presence [Los Tiempos report, in Spanish] in the province.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US military cannot hold detainees without charge under new Iraq SOFA
Deirdre Jurand on November 24, 2008 10:33 AM ET

[JURIST] US military officials will be unable to detain people without charge under the proposed new Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) [CFR materials; McClatchy translation] with the Iraqi government, and military officials are now investigating the cases of about 5,000 detainees they consider dangerous in anticipation of the change, according to an AP report [text] Sunday. The new SOFA will also prevent private security contractors operating in Iraq [CRS backgrounder, PDF] from claiming immunity from Iraqi laws and will give Iraqi courts limited jurisdiction over American military personnel [JURIST reports] for crimes committed off-base when the troops are not on an authorized mission. US military forces have been able to hold people without charge since the beginning of the conflict in 2003, but under the SOFA and Iraqi law, detentions will have to be based on evidence starting on January 1.
Earlier this month, the Iraqi cabinet voted [JURIST report] in an emergency session to approve a final draft of the SOFA between the US and Iraq. The SOFA, which determines the relationship between Iraqi, American and Multi-National Force Iraq (MNF-I) [official website] forces in the country, requires US and MNF-I forces to exit Iraqi cities by June 30 [UPI report], and calls for the removal of all combat troops by 2011 unless the Iraqi government requests otherwise. This extends the deadline for US troops to remain in Iraq for three years, as the UN mandate expires in December [UN press release]. The Iraqi parliament began SOFA hearings [UPI report] last week, with a final vote expected Wednesday. If approved by parliament, the SOFA is expected to take effect in January 2009.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Domestic workers facing abusive treatment in Middle East and Asia: HRW
Jay Carmella on November 24, 2008 10:21 AM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] said Monday in a statement [press release] in anticipation of the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women [advocacy website] that migrant and domestic workers still face abusive and exploitative treatment throughout Asia and the Middle East. The rights group observed that workers in several countries throughout the region, including millions of women, lack access to judicial systems, and often lack appropriate redress even when granted access. HRW added that the control that employers have over workers' visas increases the risk of abuse. Deputy director of the women's rights division of HRW Nisha Varia said: There are countless cases of employers threatening, humiliating, beating, raping, and sometimes killing domestic workers. Governments need to punish abusive employers through the justice system, and prevent violence by reforming labor and immigration policies that leave these workers at their employers' mercy. The United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) [official website] also announced [press release] Monday that it will award nearly $19 million to 29 countries for the development of projects concerning gender based violence, including support of organizations promoting national laws, policies and action plans on ending violence against women.
The UN [official website] inaugurated the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women in 1999 in an effort to promote public awareness of the problem. In May, Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] flagged the issue in its latest annual report [JURIST report], concluding that despite significant efforts of governments around the world, violence against women, particularly sexual violence, continues and is believed to be playing a role in the spread of disease.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|