JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, July 23, 2008

House committee begins investigation of FDA drug approvals
Deirdre Jurand at 11:30 AM ET

[JURIST] Two members of the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce [official website] began an investigation [information request, PDF; press release] Tuesday into whether the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed the continued sale of certain drugs that agency officials knew had been manufactured and sold using faulty data. The investigation began after the US Attorney for the District of Maryland filed a motion [text, PDF] with the district court early this month seeking to enforce subpoenas against pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy Laboratories [corporate website], which the government suspected of fraud, mislabeling its products, conspiracy and making false statements in violation of federal law. The motion also alleged that the FDA knew of these possible violations for 18 months but took no action. In the Committee's information request, the Representatives wrote:

Unfortunately, the FDA's alleged lack of action to remove these suspect products from the market requires this Committee to review the pre-market approval inspections of all currently marketed Ranbaxy drugs, as well as any "for cause" inspections, to determine if FDA has expended the resources required to justify leaving these suspect drugs on the market.
The Committee has requested all related preapproval and investigatory documents, lists of all suppliers and laboratories that performed bioequivalency tests, and a list of all involved FDA personnel. The FDA must provide the documents within two weeks, and the Committee wants to complete its interviews by the end of August. Reuters has more.

Ranbaxy has previously come under scrutiny by the US justice system and the FDA. In 2005, US District Court Judge Dickinson Debevoise ruled [JURIST report] that Ranbaxy had to stop production of its generic version of Pfizer Inc.'s blood-pressure drug Accupril because Pfizer was likely to win a patent-infringement lawsuit filed against Ranbaxy. In June 2006, the FDA revoked its approval from a Ranbaxy dosage form center, and in February 2007, the FDA raided and closed [Financial Express report] Ranbaxy's US headquarters in New Jersey.





Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US House votes for 20-week abortion ban
3:57 PM ET, June 19

 UK Supreme Court allows families of Iraq soldiers to sue government
2:28 PM ET, June 19

 AI: China mining companies contributing to Congo rights abuses
12:51 PM ET, June 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org