 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, May 29, 2008 |
 |
|


Europe rights court holds Russia responsible for Chechen disappearances
Deirdre Jurand on May 29, 2008 2:15 PM ET

[JURIST] The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) [official website] issued five decisions Thursday finding Russia responsible for the disappearance of a dozen people during Russian armed raids in Chechnya in 2002 and 2003. Families of the victims, all of whom are presumed dead, had raised claims under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [PDF text]. The court directed Russia to pay a total of more than 350,000 ($550,000) to the families. Russia has three months to pay or to appeal. AP has more. Read the court's rulings in Gekhayeva v. Russia, Betayev v. Russia, Sangariyeva v. Russia, Ibragimov v. Russia, Utsayeva v. Russia [judgment texts].
The ECHR has consistently ruled against Russia in similar cases involving Chechnya rights violations. In July 2007, the court ruled that Russian authorities were responsible for the shooting deaths of 11 unarmed Chechen civilians, and in June 2007 it held that Russian authorities were liable for the 2003 deaths of four Chechen family members [JURIST reports].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US civilian lawsuits against military contractors may overcome jurisdiction challenge
Deirdre Jurand on May 29, 2008 9:43 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit [official website] Wednesday ruled [opinion, PDF] to remand a set of consolidated tort claims brought against military contractors in Iraq, holding that further factual development is necessary before determining whether the cases were nonjusticiable political questions. The plaintiffs allege [Bloomberg report] that military contractor Halliburton and then-subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR) [corporate websites] misrepresented the dangers of working in Iraq and knowingly sent employees into unsafe areas, resulting in injuries and deaths. In 2006, a federal judge in Houston dismissed [memorandum and order, PDF] the suits, finding that the court did not have jurisdiction to review wartime policies. The Fifth Circuit's opinion stated that the injury claims raised may not necessarily require the court to question the military's decisions. AP has more.
KBR contracted with the US military through the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) [official website; KBR information page] to provide exclusive civilian logistics support during Iraqi reconstruction; in recent years, the company has come under increasing scrutiny. In August 2006, a KBR subcontractor settled Iraq fraud allegations [JURIST report] with the US government for $4 million. Army officials later said they would modify LOGCAP to provide better guidance to KBR after a special investigator reported [JURIST report] in 2006 that KBR was violating US regulations.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

California to begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses in June
Andrew Gilmore on May 29, 2008 9:18 AM ET

[JURIST] California Deputy State Registrar and Chief of the Office of Vital Records [official website] Janet McKee issued a memorandum [PDF text] Wednesday setting June 17 as the start date for issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The California Supreme Court's May 15 ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] in In re Marriage Cases [case materials] overturned a ban on same-sex marriage. After June 17, county clerks in California will be authorized to issue the state's redesigned marriage license [document, PDF] to all applicants, barring an intervening change in the law. The new marriage license does not include the words "bride" and "groom," instead using "Party A" and "Party B" to refer to the applicants. AP has more. The San Francisco Chronicle has local coverage.
Also Wednesday, San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera [official website] filed a brief [text, PDF; official press release] with the California Supreme Court in response to a petition [JURIST report] from a conservative Christian advocacy group seeking to stay the court's May 17 ruling. Herrera's filing argues that the advocacy group, the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) [advocacy website], lacks standing to petition the California Supreme Court since it was not a party to In re Marriage Cases. The filing argues against the ADF's allegation that the nature and timing of the ruling is "confusing", and instead asserts that there is no basis for the court to stay its ruling until the November elections.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|