Supreme Court to hear tariff, 'violent felony' sentencing cases Alexis Unkovic at 4:18 PM ET
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday agreed to hear three cases [Order List, PDF], including the consolidated cases of US v. Eurodif (07-1059) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] and USEC v. Eurodif (07-1078) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] where the Court will consider whether the federal government can impose anti-dumping tariffs on contracts for uranium enrichment services. The key issues in the cases center on whether raw materials from the United States that are reprocessed abroad constitute a "good" or a "service." US law does not allow tariffs to be imposed on "services." AP has more.
The Court also granted certiorari Monday in Chambers v. US (06-11206) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] where the Court will consider whether a conviction for "escape" after a defendant fails to report for confinement qualifies as a "violent felony" within the meaning of the Armed Career Criminal Act [18 USC § 924(e) text]. The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled [PDF text] last year that all escapes are violent crimes. A Supreme Court ruling in the case could resolve a current 10-2 split among the circuit courts of appeals. SCOUTSBLOG has more on both certiorari grants.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.