 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, March 18, 2008 |
 |
|


Kenya parliament approves power-sharing agreement in bid to end violence
Devin Montgomery on March 18, 2008 7:26 PM ET

[JURIST] The Parliament of Kenya [official website] Tuesday voted unanimously to approve a power-sharing agreement [JURIST report] between Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki [official profile] and opposition leader Raila Odinga [campaign profile]. The Kenya Accord and Reconciliation Act 2008 [text], intended to end violence sparked by the country's disputed 2007 presidential election [JURIST report], names Odinga as the nation's first Prime Minister. The agreement has been praised by the US State Department and former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, who helped broker the deal. Reuters has more. CNN has additional coverage.
The controversial presidential vote sparked simmering ethnic tensions in the country, where Kibaki has long been accused of using his position to favor members of the Kikuyu tribe. Fueling accusations of malfeasance, Kibaki won the December 27 election despite early opinion polls that placed rival candidate Odinga in the lead. Thousands of opposition supporters took to the streets following the election, which prompted the government to temporarily ban public rallies and institute a curfew in Nairobi, the capital city. Human Rights Watch reports that over 1,000 people have been killed and 500,000 displaced since protests began. Odinga's opposition party, the Orange Democratic Movement filed a formal complaint [JURIST report] in January with the International Criminal Court [official website], alleging that Kibaki's administration committed crimes against humanity while using force against demonstrators.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Nepal police arrest 50 in pro-Tibet protest
Deirdre Jurand on March 18, 2008 6:43 PM ET

[JURIST] Nepalese police arrested 50 protesters Tuesday after roughly 200 Tibetan exiles demonstrated near the country's UN headquarters in Katmandu, demanding a UN investigation into China's recent crackdown against pro-Tibet protests [BBC backgrounder]. The protesters, who were arrested after refusing to leave the site, began a hunger strike early Tuesday and were later joined by monks, forming the third demonstration this week [AP report] by Tibetan exiles against Chinese rule. Chinese state media later reported that 105 protesters in Tibet itself had surrendered to police [AP report].
The protests, which began last Monday, escalated into violence Friday as protesters attacked police vehicles, non-Tibetans migrants, and businesses. On Sunday, the Chinese government blocked Internet access [JURIST report] to the video-sharing website YouTube after videos of the recent government crackdown appeared on the site. Rights groups have criticized China for ongoing human rights violations [HRW materials] targeted at Tibetans, and many call for the total independence [advocacy website] of the currently "semi-autonomous" region. The Dalai Lama, who accused China Sunday of committing "cultural genocide" [JURIST report] in Tibet, has encouraged the protests but said he will step down [AFP report] if the violence worsens. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo detainee Khadr accuses US interrogators of threats, physical abuse
Devin Montgomery on March 18, 2008 6:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr [DOD materials; JURIST news archive] said in an affidavit released Tuesday that US interrogators in Afghanistan threatened him with rape, physically abused him, and forced him to swear to false statements. The 63-item statement, signed by Khadr on February 22, was heavily redacted by the US military before its release, omitting many of the specific details of his alleged mistreatment. Khadr's Navy-appointed military lawyer said the abuse allegations cast doubt on the validity of statements Khadr made during interrogation. It was revealed last week that one of Khadr's interrogators was a already pleaded guilty [JURIST reports] to charges related to the mistreatment of another detainee In Afghanistan who died. AP has more. The Canadian Press has additional coverage.
Khadr, now 21, faces life imprisonment after allegedly throwing a grenade that killed one US soldier and wounded another while fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2002. He was charged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] in April 2007 with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism, as well as spying. Khadr is one of four [JURIST report] Guantanamo detainees that have been prosecuted under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [PDF text].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court denies ex-Enron execs appeal against remaining charges
Caitlin Price on March 18, 2008 4:50 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit [official website] Tuesday rejected an appeal by three former Enron Broadband Services [JURIST news archive] executives seeking the dismissal of remaining charges after a jury failed to reach a verdict on all counts in their 2005 fraud trial. Former VP Scott Yeager, former senior VP Rex Shelby, and former CEO Joseph Hirko [Houston Chronicle profiles] were initially indicted [PDF text] by federal prosecutors on 164 criminal counts for allegedly overstating the value of the broadband division's software and network to inflate the value of Enron's stock. They were acquitted [JURIST report] on various charges in 2005, but the jury failed to reach a verdict on all counts, and prosecutors later re-indicted [JURIST report] the defendants. Defense lawyers argued [JURIST report] that there is no basis for the remaining charges or for a retrial, but the Fifth Circuit ruled that a jury could find the men guilty of other charges despite their acquittals.
Yeager was acquitted of conspiracy, wire fraud, and security fraud, while Shelby and Hirko were acquitted of some insider trading and money laundering charges. Federal prosecutors may seek to pursue the remaining insider trading and money laundering charges against Yeager, and, in a separate case, conspiracy, wire fraud, and security fraud charges against Shelby and Hirko. The Houston Chronicle has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Afghanistan must do more to stop human rights abuses: UN official
Caitlin Price on March 18, 2008 4:01 PM ET

[JURIST] Chief Human Rights Officer Norah Niland of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan [official website] Tuesday called on the Afghan government to do more to protect human rights and see that human rights violators are brought to justice. Speaking at a press conference [transcript] in Kabul, Niland said a general sense that human rights violators could operate with impunity was undermining Afghans' faith in the state. He also urged the international community to take a more active role in addressing underlying problems in Afghanistan, including poverty, gender inequality and violence against women, and violence against civilians in war zones: As elsewhere, the key ingredients for progress on human rights include vision, leadership, and the commitment of all concerned stakeholders. The relationship between the citizen and the state is the key, but everyone has a role to play in advancing human rights. Building an environment that is conducive to respect for human rights is fundamental to a peaceful and democratic society.
...
The first issue addressed in the report is the profound level of poverty that blights the lives of many Afghans. Everyone has the right to a dignified life. Poverty is disempowering. It is often rooted in oppressive and abusive practices and structures. Poverty can be crippling and it often puts lives at risk. We are all aware of the statistics here in Afghanistan that throw a harsh light on the human rights deficit in this country. Of course it is clear that there have been some helpful gains such as gains in the right to education or health or improved prospects of employment, including women outside their homes and these are of course most welcome. However it is clear that we need much more stronger commitment - investment of political will and resources are needed to reduce, for example, maternal mortality and infant mortality rates which pose a big challenge to the right to life.
Grinding poverty is an issue for large segments of Afghan society; it is of particular concern in relation to Afghan women and girls. Life is better for some Afghan women and girls. It is better for those who are now able to go to school, can work outside the home, or have access to basic health care. However, deep-rooted social, economic and political discrimination persists. It takes time everywhere to achieve gender equality but the severity of the situation here in Afghanistan, demands much stronger commitments and more concerted action than is currently the case. High levels of violence against women and girls is a major concern, challenging such patterns should be a high priority of everyone, not just the concern of those who are directly victimised. Niland said Afghan citizens had a "very strong commitment" to justice. Reuters has more.
Niland's comments followed similar urgings [text] by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour [official profile] after a November 2007 visit to Afghanistan, in which she noted that human rights violations continued to be a major problem hindering security in the war-torn country.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bear Stearns hit with lawsuits over stock value, proposed merger
James M Yoch Jr on March 18, 2008 2:14 PM ET

[JURIST] Beleaguered investment bank Bear Stearns [corporate website] was hit with two major lawsuits Monday in the wake of its announced acquisition [press release] by JPMorgan Chase [corporate website]. The first suit [complaint, PDF], filed in US District Court for the Southern District of New York [official website], alleged that some of the company's officers and directors - including Chairman James Cayne, CEO Alan Schwartz and former CEO Alan Greenberg - publicly misrepresented Bear Stearns's financial health, which artificially inflated the company's market value and caused real economic loss to investors in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [text]. It additionally requested class action status on behalf of all stockholders who purchased Bear Stearns stock between December 14, 2006 and March 14, 2008. The complaint identified several public statements by the company or its executives during the class period allegedly misrepresenting the "truth about Bear Stearns' exposure to mortgage-related liability, its profitability and its actual business prospects going forward," including an August 3, 2007 press release that addressed Standard & Poor's outlook for Bear Stearns.
Also on Monday, a Bear Stearns employee seeking class action status filed a complaint in the same court alleging that directors breached their fiduciary duties to the company's employees in connection with its employee stock ownership plan. The lawsuit claimed that the directors offered Bear Stearns stock as an option for plan participants and invested retirement funds in Bear Stearns stock despite knowing that the company's stock price was inflated and would result in substantial losses. The complaint also claimed that the company failed to disclose information that employees needed in order to make informed decisions about their participation in the retirement plan. Bloomberg has more. Reuters has additional coverage.
Bear Stearns stock dropped precipitously last week after it was announced that the US Federal Reserve had provided it with emergency funds to avoid insolvency; on Sunday, JPMorgan Chase announced that it had reached a deal with the company to buy it out [merger agreement text, PDF] for $236 million, about $2 per share, a fraction of its prior market price.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Armenia parliament votes to restrict public demonstrations
Brett Murphy on March 18, 2008 12:02 PM ET

[JURIST] The National Assembly of Armenia [official website] voted during an emergency session [press release] Monday to place restrictions on rallies and demonstrations. By a vote of 90-6, the parliament empowered the government to ban rallies if a "trustworthy" report indicates that a demonstration would pose a risk to "national security, public order, or violate citizens' constitutional rights." Opposition members say that the new measures are directed at stifling their rallies against the recent presidential election, which they say was plagued by fraud.
Last week, Armenian President Robert Kocharian [official website] issued a decree lifting media restrictions put in place during a state of emergency [JURIST reports] declared after last month's contested election. Many media restrictions remain in place, however, and the government is accused of censoring material deemed to be critical of its policies [RFE/RL report]. Kocharian declared the state of emergency on March 1 after protesters demonstrated against the result of the February 19 presidential election in which Prime Minister Serzh Sarksyan [official profile], a Kocharian ally, was declared the winner [BBC report]. Earlier this month, the Constitutional Court of Armenia rejected a challenge [JURIST report] brought by opposition candidate Levon Ter-Petrosian [campaign website] against the election results, ruling that although polling discrepancies existed they did not affect the election's outcome. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules Washington state primary election system constitutional
Jeannie Shawl on March 18, 2008 10:13 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Tuesday that Washington's system for primary elections does not violate the First Amendment right of freedom of association. The decision came in the consolidated cases of Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party and Washington v. Washington State Republican Party [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], challenges to Initiative 872 [PDF text], which instituted a "top two" primary system in 2004. The system allows voters to select any candidate in the primary, with the top two vote-getters facing off in the November election, even if they are from the same party.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held [PDF text] that the initiative violated First Amendment rights of state political parties, but the Supreme Court reversed: Because I872 does not on its face impose a severe burden on political parties' associational rights, and because respondents' arguments to the contrary rest on factual assumptions about voter confusion that can be evaluated only in the context of an as-applied challenge, we reverse. The Court went on to conclude:Respondents ask this Court to invalidate a popularly enacted election process that has never been carried out. Immediately after implementing regulations were enacted, respondents obtained a permanent injunction against the enforcement of I872. The First Amendment does not require this extraordinary and precipitous nullification of the will of the people. Because I872 does not on its face provide for the nomination of candidates or compel political parties to associate with or endorse candidates, and because there is no basis in this facial challenge for presuming that candidates' party-preference designations will confuse voters, I872 does not on its face severely burden respondents' associational rights. We accordingly hold that I872 is facially constitutional. Read the Court's opinion [text] per Justice Thomas, along with a concurrence [text] from Chief Justice Roberts, and a dissent [text] from Justice Scalia. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FBI submitted inaccurate data to terrorist watch list: DOJ report
Michael Sung on March 18, 2008 9:45 AM ET

[JURIST] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has submitted incomplete and inaccurate information to be added to the US government's consolidated terrorist watchlist [FBI FAQ] over the last three years, according to a report [PDF text] released Monday by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) [official website]. The audit, conducted between June and October 2007, found that: the FBI was not always providing updated nominations when new information became known about a nominated individual. We also found that the FBI was not always removing records from the watchlist when it was appropriate to do so. Moreover, FBI headquarters officials reported that watchlist nomination submissions from field offices were often incomplete or contained inaccuracies, headquarters officials reported that watchlist nomination submissions from field offices were often incomplete or contained inaccuracies, which caused delays in the processing of nominations. We concluded that the FBI should require its Supervisory Special Agents (SSA) to review all nominations submitted by their case agents for accuracy and completeness. These individuals should also be responsible for helping to ensure that case agents create nominations for all individuals who meet the FBI's threshold for nomination. The audit also found that FBI field offices have previously bypassed FBI headquarters and directly submitted nominations to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) [official website] for inclusion to the list, potentially bypassing quality review and affecting the completeness of the FBI's records. In response to the audit, FBI Assistant Director John Miller said that the agency is working with the DOJ and other partner agencies [press release] to "ensure the proper balance between national security protection and the need for accurate, efficient, and streamlined watchlist processes."
Last October, the US Government Accountability Office [official website] said that the US terror watchlist has increased to over 755,000 names [JURIST report], growing by about 200,000 names per year since 2004. Critics have warned that the rapidly increasing size of the list undermines its authority and throws its accuracy into question. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|