 |
|

Legal news from Monday, March 17, 2008 |
 |
|


Supreme Court hears arguments in Philippines assets, right to counsel cases
Andrew Gilmore on March 17, 2008 7:36 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Philippines v. Pimentel [LII case backgrounder; ABA merit briefs], 06-1204 [docket], where the Court considered whether some 9,000 plaintiffs seeking to recover assets held by former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos [official profile] can be awarded assets claimed by the government of the Philippines. The Republic of the Philippines and the Philippine Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) [official website] claim ownership of funds improperly moved out of the Philippines by Marcos and invested with US investment bank Merrill Lynch, as does Mariano Pimentel, the representative of a class of 9,539 people holding an unsatisfied human rights judgment [opinion] against Marcos' estate. In 2000, the Philippines asked Merrill Lynch to transfer the funds in question to the Philippine National Bank. Merrill Lynch initiated the interpleader action to settle ownership of the funds, listing the Philippines, PCGG, and Pimentel, among others, as claimants. The Philippines and PCGG asserted their sovereign immunity from the suit and moved to dismiss the entire action, arguing that they are indispensable parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b) [text]. The Supreme Court is considering "Whether a foreign government that is a 'necessary' party to a lawsuit under Rule 19(a) and has successfully asserted sovereign immunity is, under Rule 19(b), an 'indispensable' party to an action brought in the courts of the United States to settle ownership of assets claimed by that government." Several justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, seemed sympathetic to the group trying to enforce the judgment against Marcos' estate, but other justices, including Justice Antonin Scalia, suggested that arguments that the situation is "unfair" to Marcos' victims were ineffective as the sovereign immunity doctrine "always has unfairness." AP has more.
The Court also heard arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Rothgery v. Gillespie County [LII case backgrounder; merit briefs], 07-440, [docket], a Sixth Amendment case in which the Court is considering whether the right to counsel of a person arrested without a warrant is triggered by his initial appearance before a magistrate and prior to the filing of a criminal indictment against him.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court agrees to hear broadcast indecency, Confrontation Clause cases
Alexis Unkovic on March 17, 2008 2:06 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday agreed to hear eight cases [Order List, PDF], including FCC v. Fox Television Stations (07-582) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], where the Court will review a June 2007 ruling [JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which vacated [opinion, PDF] a determination [FCC order] by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) [official website] that two Fox Television broadcasts violated the FCC's indecency and profanity prohibitions. The appeals court ruled that the FCC's "fleeting expletives" standard "represented a significant departure from positions previously taken by the agency and relied on by the broadcast industry," and violated the Administrative Procedure Act [text] because the FCC failed to articulate a reasoned basis for its change in policy. The two alleged indecency violations were unscripted expletives uttered during the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards. When the case is heard in the fall, it will mark the Court's first major examination of broadcast indecency in 30 years. AP has more.
The Court also agreed to hear Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (07-591) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], a case presenting the issue of whether the Confrontation Clause [LII backgrounder] as set forth in Crawford v. Washington [opinion] requires that a forensic expert who prepared a lab report testify at trial as to his methods or whether prosecutors can present the report at trial without requiring its author to be available for live testimony. AP has more.
The Court also granted certiorari in Bartlett v. Strickland (07-689) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] in which it will consider whether a racial minority group that comprises less than 50 percent of a district's population can file a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 USC § 1973 [text]. The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled [opinion, PDF] that the Act only applies to districts where the minority population constitutes 50 percent or more of voters. AP has more.
The Court also agreed to hear Waddington v. Sarausad (07-772) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], in which it will consider whether a ruling [PDF text] by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit correctly overturned the murder conviction of a driver in a 1994 Seattle drive-by shooting on the grounds of incorrect jury instructions on accomplice liability. AP has more.
In Negusie v. Mukasey (07-499) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether an Eritrean man who was forced against his will into military service in his home country during a war between Eritrea and Ethiopia and made to participate in persecution can be denied asylum for those actions.
In Vaden v. Discover Bank (07-773) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether federal courts have jurisdiction in a lawsuit seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement under state law.
In Jimenez v. Quarterman (07-6984) [docket], the Court will consider whether the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit correctly allowed an appeal by an inmate seeking an extension to file a federal habeas corpus challenge, after he had been denied review in state courts.
Finally, in Oregon v. Ice (07-901) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether it is unconstitutional for a judge to order a man to serve consecutive rather than concurrent sentences for burglary and sex offense convictions when a judge rather than a jury determined that the crimes arose out of separate offenses. SCOTUSblog has more on all of Monday's cert. grants.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Kenya election violence planned by local leaders: HRW report
Caitlin Price on March 17, 2008 1:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The violence that wracked Kenya after the nation's disputed 2007 presidential election [JURIST report] was carefully organized by "local leaders, politicians, and businessmen from all sides," according to a report [HRW materials; press release] released Monday by Human Rights Watch [advocacy website]. Based on over 200 interviews with witnesses and perpetrators of the violence, the report found that attacks on supporters of Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki [official profile], largely members of the Kikuyu tribe, were planned and organized by local leaders. Reprisal attacks by Kikuyu militias were similarly organized: The Kikuyu militias who struck in late January were organized, paid, and directed by local leaders, businessmen, and, in some cases, [Party of National Unity (PNU)] councillors and mobilizers. The extent to which the local organizers were in touch with senior PNU politicians or members of the government is unclear. But circumstantial evidence suggests that senior members of the government may have been aware of what was going on. HRW also reported that Kenyan police had used excessive force and unlawful killings to quell demonstrations. HRW applauded Kibaki's plan to establish an investigatory panel [JURIST report] to review the election's outcome as part of a power-sharing deal [JURIST report] negotiated between Kibaki and opposition candidate Raila Odinga [campaign profile] last month.
Kibaki has long been accused of using his position to favor members of the Kikuyu tribe. Fueling accusations of malfeasance, Kibaki won the December 27 election despite early opinion polls that placed rival candidate Odinga in the lead. Thousands of opposition supporters took to the streets following the election, which prompted the government to temporarily ban public rallies and institute a curfew in Nairobi, the capital city. HRW reports that over 1,000 people have been killed and 500,000 displaced since protests began. Odinga's opposition party, the Orange Democratic Movement filed a formal complaint [JURIST report] in January with the International Criminal Court [official website], alleging that Kibaki's administration committed crimes against humanity while using force against demonstrators. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq human rights situation 'disastrous:' Amnesty
Michael Sung on March 17, 2008 10:18 AM ET

[JURIST] The human rights situation in Iraq is "disastrous" [press release] five years after the US-led invasion of the country, according to a report [PDF text] from Amnesty International [advocacy website] released Monday. According to the report's introduction: Five years after the US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussain, Iraq is one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Hundreds of people are being killed every month in the pervasive violence, while countless lives are threatened every day by poverty, cuts to power and water supplies, food and medical shortages, and rising violence against women and girls. Sectarian hatred has torn apart families and neighbourhoods that once lived together in harmony.
Despite the heavy US and Iraqi military and police presence, law and order remain a distant prospect. The US-led Multinational Force (MNF) and the Iraqi government formed from political parties that gained from or emerged out of the 2003 invasion have failed to institute the rule of law, uphold human rights, bring peace and security, or end impunity. Amnesty criticized the reintroduction of the death penalty in 2004, saying that at least 33 Iraqis were executed in the past year, often after procedurally flawed trials. Women's rights have also suffered since the 2003 invasion, as more women have been forced to wear Islamic dress or have been targeted for abduction, rape or killing. AFP has more.
Also Monday, the International Committee of the Red Cross [official website] released a report [PDF text; press release] deploring the humanitarian situation in Iraq. The ICRC expressed particular concern with "insufficient access to clean water, sanitation and health care" and urged "all those involved in the conflict and those who can influence them must do everything possible to ensure that civilians, medical staff and medical facilities are not harmed," saying that "This is an obligation under international humanitarian law that applies to all parties to an armed conflict both States and non-State actors." CBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Turkish top court may hear case seeking to ban ruling party
Michael Sung on March 17, 2008 9:55 AM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Turkey [official website, English version] on Monday said it will decide whether to consider a bid to disband the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) [party website, in Turkish] within ten days, adding that the court is in the process of appointing a rapporteur to investigate the case. Chief prosecutor Abdurrahman Yalcinkaya [official profile, in Turkish] petitioned the court last week to disband the AKP and bar Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul [BBC profiles] from political office. Yalcinkaya alleges that the AKP is the "focal point of anti-secular activities" and that the party "has tried to chip away at the principles of secularism."
On Saturday, Erdogan criticized the bid to disband the AKP [JURIST report], saying it was a "step against the national will." The AKP, which emerged in 2001 from a banned Islamist party, took 47 percent of the vote in the national parliamentary elections last July. The AKP controls the offices of the prime minister and president, and dominates the 550-seat parliament with 340 lawmakers. The Constitutional Court has banned several Islamist parties in the past, including the Welfare Party, which led Turkey's first pro-Islamist government for nearly a year, for violating constitutional obligations to respect Turkey's strict secular principles. AKP has long been at odds with Turkey's secular establishment; the party prompted backlash from the Republican People's Party [official website] most recently for the passage of a constitutional amendment easing a ban on Islamic headscarves [JURIST report] in universities. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Dalai Lama accuses China of 'cultural genocide' in Tibet after protest crackdown
Michael Sung on March 17, 2008 8:56 AM ET

[JURIST] Exiled Tibetan spiritual and political leader Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama [personal website; BBC profile] on Sunday accused China of committing "cultural genocide" [recorded video] in Tibet, and said he will not call for an end to ongoing protests [BBC backgrounder] in the region. He reiterated the right of Tibetans to protest peacefully and urged that an international investigation be launched into China's tactics in suppressing the protests, sparked by concerns that non-ethnic Tibetan migrants are threatening to dilute the traditional Tibetan culture. The Dalai Lama also refused to ask protesters to surrender to Chinese authorities by midnight on Monday, the deadline set by government authorities.
The protests, which began last Monday, escalated into violence Friday as protesters attacked police vehicles, non-Tibetans migrants, and businesses. On Sunday, the Chinese government blocked Internet access [JURIST report] to the video-sharing website YouTube after videos of the recent government crackdown appeared on the site. The Dalai Lama, who fled Tibet in 1959 after the failure of a Tibetan rebellion, currently advocates Tibetan autonomy rather than Tibetan independence from China. The Chinese government has long faced criticism for financial neglect of the region, religious persecution, the destruction of Buddhist temples, and brutality towards Tibetan dissidents, though concerns eased somewhat after "Open Door" reforms were implemented in the 1980s under international pressure. Even with the marginal gains, rights groups still criticize the China for ongoing human rights violations [HRW materials] targeted at Tibetans, and many call for the total independence [advocacy website] of the currently "semi-autonomous" region. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|