 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, March 11, 2008 |
 |
|


Federal appeals court blocks contempt fine against anthrax reporter
Jeannie Shawl on March 11, 2008 6:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday granted [PDF text] a request [JURIST report] filed by former USA Today reporter Toni Locy [profile] to block a daily contempt of court fine while Locy appeals the district court decision to impose sanctions against her for refusing to disclose government sources who provided information about former US Army germ-warfare researcher Dr. Steven J. Hatfill [Washington Post profile]. In a ruling last week, US District Judge Reggie Walton found Locy in contempt of court [PDF text; JURIST report] and ordered that, beginning Tuesday, Locy pay a fine of $500 a day; the fine was due to increase to $1000 a day after one week and then up to $5000 a day after two weeks. Hatfill refused to delay the sanctions until Locy can file an appeal and also ruled that Locy cannot accept reimbursement for the monetary sanctions. The appeals court, however, ruled that monetary sanctions should be stayed while Locy pursues an appeal.
Locy, now a journalism professor at West Virginia University, has refused to cooperate in Hatfill's suit against the Department of Justice (DOJ) for its alleged violation of the US Privacy Act [text], arguing that the information Hatfill is seeking has not been demonstrated to be central to the lawsuit. Hatfill was identified as a "person of interest" in the investigations of the 2001 anthrax attacks [GWU backgrounder]. He contends that FBI and DOJ officials violated federal privacy laws [complaint, PDF; JURIST report] by providing personal information and information about the investigation to journalists. Locy and former CBS reporter James Stewart have refused to comply with orders to reveal their sources. Locy has said that she no longer has notes from her reports and that she cannot recall who gave her the information. Walton has not yet decided whether to hold Stewart in contempt. AP has more.
Editor's Note: Toni Locy served as a JURIST student staff member while pursuing her MSL at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 2006-07.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

State Department deplores rights records of North Korea, Iran, in annual reports
Jeannie Shawl on March 11, 2008 4:11 PM ET

[JURIST] The US State Department Tuesday heavily criticized the right records of North Korea, Iran, Myanmar, Syria, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Eritrea and Sudan Tuesday in its annual report on worldwide human rights observance. In the introduction [text] to the its 2007 Reports on Human Rights Practices [index], the Department noted that "Countries in which power was concentrated in the hands of unaccountable rulers remained the worlds most systematic human rights violators." The State Department summed up the record of its top three violators in these terms: The repressive North Korean regime continued to control almost all aspects of citizens lives, denying freedom of speech, press, assembly, and association, and restricting freedom of movement and workers rights. Reports of extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and arbitrary detention, including of political prisoners, continued to emerge from the insular country. Some forcibly repatriated refugees were said to have undergone severe punishment and possibly torture. Reports of public executions also continued to emerge.
Burmas abysmal human rights record continued to worsen. Throughout the year, the regime continued to commit extrajudicial killings and was responsible for disappearances, arbitrary and indefinite detentions, rape, and torture. In September, security forces killed at least 30 demonstrators and detained over 3,000 others during a brutal crackdown on peaceful demonstrators, including monks and pro-democracy protesters. Despite promises of dialogue, the regime did not honor its commitment to begin a genuine discussion with the democratic opposition and ethnic minority groups. Defying calls from the UN Security Council and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations for the early release of all political prisoners, the regime continued to hold opposition leaders under incarceration, including Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, who remained under house arrest.
The Iranian regime violated freedom of speech and assembly, intensifying its crackdown against dissidents, journalists, womens rights activists, labor activists, and those who disagreed with it through arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, abductions, the use of excessive force, and the widespread denial of fair public trials. The regime continued to detain and abuse religious and ethnic minorities. Authorities used stoning as a method of execution and as a sentence for alleged adultery cases despite a government moratorium in 2002 banning the practice. The regime continued to support terrorist movements and violent extremists in Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon and called for the destruction of a UN member state. The Department additionally condemned Sudan for a "horrific" record and criticized Russia [Reuters reports] for restrictions on the media, harassment of NGOs, and "corruption and selectivity in enforcement of the law." Among close US allies, the State Department flagged ongoing human rights problems in Pakistan, Iraq, amd Afghanistan.
China - whose own human rights record was labelled "poor" this year - regularly responds to the State Department's annual report with its own generally negative assessment of America's rights record [JURIST report]. The State Department addressed criticism of US human rights practices this way:As we publish these reports, the Department of State remains mindful of both international and domestic criticism of the United States' human rights record. The U.S. government will continue to hear and reply forthrightly to concerns about our own practices, including the actions we have taken to defend our nation from the global threat of terrorism. Our laws, policies, and practices have evolved considerably in recent years, and we continue to strive to protect innocent civilians from attack while honoring our longstanding commitment to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms. As part of this effort, the United States submits reports to international bodies in accordance with its obligations under various human rights treaties to which it is a party.
We take all of our human rights commitments seriously and, in our good faith efforts to meet those commitments, we value the vital role played by civil society and independent media. We do not consider views about our performance voiced by others in the international community to be interference in our internal affairs, nor should other governments regard expressions about their performance as such. Indeed, under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is the right and the responsibility of "every individual and every organ of society to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Zuma asks South Africa constitutional court to exclude evidence in corruption case
Mike Rosen-Molina on March 11, 2008 1:10 PM ET

[JURIST] South African politician Jacob Zuma [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] launched a legal challenge Tuesday in the South African Constitutional Court [official website] seeking to have evidence excluded from his upcoming corruption trial. Zuma argued that evidence seized in 2005 raids by the Directorate of Special Investigations [official backgrounder; BBC report], also known as "The Scorpions," should be thrown out because the raids violated his rights to privacy and fair trial. Last November, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal upheld [JURIST report] the validity of the search warrants used for the raids. AFP has more.
Zuma has been facing corruption allegations [BBC timeline] and other charges for several years; he was first charged with corruption in 2005, but those charges were later dismissed [JURIST report] because prosecutors failed to follow proper procedures. In December 2007, South Africa's National Prosecuting Authority [official website] served an indictment [JURIST report] on Zuma, charging him with corruption, fraud, money laundering and racketeering related to alleged bribes received from arms manufacturer Thint, a subsidiary of the France-based Thales Group [corporate website]. His trial is scheduled to begin in August. Zuma is the leader of the ruling African National Congress [party website], putting him in position to become the country's next president.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Military commissions undermined by 'evidence tainted by torture': rights group
Mike Rosen-Molina on March 11, 2008 12:04 PM ET

[JURIST] The legitimacy of military commissions of Guantanamo Bay detainees will be undermined by "the admission of evidence tainted by torture," according to a report [PDF text; press release] released Monday by Human Rights First [advocacy website]. The report cites the cases of six Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees who have alleged that they were tortured in US custody, and says that so-called harsh interrogation techniques have no track record of producing reliable information. It further argued that admitting evidence obtained through controversial techniques like waterboarding [JURIST news archive] has thrown the legitimacy of the military commissions into doubt: A question of legitimacy hangs over the detention and legal proceedings at Guantanamo. Defense lawyers and human rights groups are not alone in their indictment of the military commission process. Many law enforcement and military officials are critical of the MCA's evidentiary rules. These officials know that the reliance on coerced testimony will only serve to tarnish the military commission proceedings at home and in the international community, jeopardize the government's ability to secure convictions that can withstand scrutiny on appeal, and perpetuate the use of abusive interrogation techniques. A Defense Department spokesman dismissed the report's findings for making "ill-founded assumptions" about the nature of evidence that military prosecutors will use during detainees' military commissions. AFP has more.
The report was released two days after President George W. Bush vetoed [JURIST report] an intelligence funding bill [HR 2082 materials] that would restrict CIA interrogators to using only interrogation techniques explicitly authorized by the 2006 Army Field Manual. Though the US Senate approved [JURIST report] the measure on February 13, it failed to approve it by the two-thirds majority necessary to override a presidential veto. The US House agreed to the measure [JURIST report] in December. Field Manual 2-22.3 [PDF text; press release], Human Intelligence Collector Operations, explicitly prohibits the use of waterboarding, electrocution, sensory deprivation, inducing hypothermia, or depriving the subject of food, water, or medical care. The 2006 manual also specifies that the Geneva Conventions [ICRC materials] apply to all detainees [JURIST report] and eliminates separate standards for the questioning of prisoners of war and enemy combatants.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former Croatian generals go on trial at ICTY
Michael Sung on March 11, 2008 10:14 AM ET

[JURIST] The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website; JURIST news archive] began the trial [press release] of Croatian general Ante Gotovina [ICTY case backgrounder, PDF; BBC profile] and two other militant commanders Tuesday. Gotovina, Ivan Cermak, and Mladen Markac, are charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity for their alleged involvement in the 1995 Operation Storm [BBC report], in which Croatian forces allegedly murdered 150 Serbs in Krajina and expelled thousands of Serbian civilians from Krajina, Croatia. If convicted, the three face a maximum punishment of life imprisonment.
Gotovina [JURIST news archive], who was indicted [PDF text] in 2001, was the third most-wanted ICTY war crimes suspect until his arrest [JURIST report] in Spain's Canary Islands in 2005. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House panel says EPA withholding info on California emissions waiver rejection
Michael Sung on March 11, 2008 10:00 AM ET

[JURIST] US House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) [official website] accused the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] Monday of withholding information from the committee and threatened to take action to compel production of the requested information connected to the EPA's decision to turn down California's greenhouse gas emissions waiver request. In a letter [PDF text] to the head of the PA, Waxman said: I appreciate the efforts EPA has taken to collect responsible documents, but I am concerned about the failure of the agency to produce requested documents to the Committee. Therefore, I ask that your staff work with Committee staff to establish by the close of business on March 12, 2008, a mutually agreeable deadline for the production of the specifically requested documents, as well as the remaining documents involving the White House and the Department of Justice. If no acceptable voluntary schedule is established, I anticipate taking steps to require production of the documents. The US House Government Oversight Committee is probing whether the EPA improperly denied a greenhouse emissions waiver [rejection letter, PDF; JURIST report] to California, which is seeking to introduce higher greenhouse emission standards than those mandated by federal law.
In December 2007, the EPA denied California's waiver request, with EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson saying that a unified national standard for greenhouse gas regulation was preferable to a state-by-state network of regulations and pointing to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 [HR 6 materials; WH fact sheet], signed into law that month by President George W. Bush. California filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] in January to challenge the denial. Last month, the EPA issued an official explanation [JURIST report] of its decision to deny California's waiver request. Also last month, internal EPA documents [press release and excerpts] revealed that agents with the EPA urged Johnson to approve the waiver request [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|