 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, February 5, 2008 |
 |
|


Federal judge rules Georgia water deal for US reservoir use invalid
Deirdre Jurand on February 5, 2008 6:20 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal court of appeals judge struck down [ruling, PDF] a 2003 agreement between Georgia and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) [official website] allowing the state's use of a federal water reservoir. Judge Judith Rogers of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled that the agreement violates the Water Supply Act [text] because it allowed the Corps to make major operational changes to the Lake Lanier reservoir [USACE backgrounder] without prior Congressional approval as required by the Act. Alabama and Florida had contested the agreement, arguing that Georgia has no rights to the federal reservoir and that the state's use of that water could drain Alabama and Florida's smaller rivers. Alabama Gov. Bob Riley called [press release] the ruling "the most consequential legal ruling in the 18-year history of the water war" between Georgia, which requires more water to feed the increasingly urban Atlanta area, and its neighboring states. Officials at the Georgia governor's office are considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] earlier ruled in favor of Georgia, saying that the Corps of Engineers did not exceed its authority. In its reversal, the Court of Appeals noted that the diversion of about 22 percent of the reservoir's water to the Atlanta area, as proposed by the agreement, would directly impact Florida and Alabama, which are downstream from Georgia. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

CIA chief confirms use of waterboarding on 3 terror detainees
Caitlin Price on February 5, 2008 2:27 PM ET

[JURIST] The CIA has used waterboarding [JURIST news archive] "on only three detainees" since September 11, 2001, CIA Director Michael Hayden [official profile] told the US Senate Intelligence Committee [official website] Tuesday. Stipulating that the interrogation technique has not been used by the CIA in five years, Hayden for the first time named the men waterboarded: accused 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], senior al Qaeda member Abu Zubaydah [BBC profile, JURIST news archive], and alleged mastermind of the 2000 USS Cole bombing Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri [GlobalSecurity profile; JURIST news archive]. Hayden said that at the time of the waterboardings, officials feared "imminent attack" on the US. He also said that less than one-third of the roughly 100 terror detainees held in CIA custody were exposed to any kind of coercive interrogation.
The controversy over whether waterboarding constitutes illegal torture first loomed large late last year as then-Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey tried to duck the issue [JURIST report] in his confirmation hearings and former CIA agent John Kiriakou unofficially confirmed the use of waterboarding [JURIST report] during interrogations of US terror suspects. Also in December, Hayden sent a memo [JURIST report] to CIA employees saying that the agency videotaped the 2002 interrogations of Zubaydah and al-Nashiri, but that the tapes were destroyed [JURIST news archive] in 2005 amid concerns that they could be leaked to the public and compromise the identities of the interrogators. Last month, the now Mukasey-led Department of Justice announced that it had opened a criminal investigation [JURIST report] into the destruction of the tapes. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia high court affirms ex-PM disqualification from presidential election
Caitlin Price on February 5, 2008 1:09 PM ET

[JURIST] The Russian Supreme Court [official website, in Russian] Tuesday rejected the appeal of former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov [personal website, in Russian; BBC profile] to reinstate his candidacy in the March Russian presidential election. Last week, the Russian Central Election Commission banned Kasyanov from running in the election [JURIST report], rejecting 13.36 percent of signatures he submitted in support of his candidacy as either forged or incorrect. Under Russian law, no more than 5 percent of signatures in support of a candidate can be disqualified if that candidate is to run in the election. The Supreme Court conducted a one-day hearing before ruling in support of the Commission decision. A spokeswoman for Kasyanov said that both decisions "ignored the views of citizens." Russian prosecutors said earlier this month that they had launched a forgery investigation [JURIST report] into Kasyanov.
Kasyanov was an outspoken critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin [official website] and his allies in the run-up to last December's parliamentary elections. Kasyanov has accused Putin, long charged with suppressing dissent, of directly refusing to register his candidacy. Kasyanov was not expected to pose a serious challenge in the March election, polling at less than 1 percent. Putin-backed Dmitry Medvedev [BBC profile], chairman of Russian gas company Gazprom [corporate website], leads all major opinion polls. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rwanda genocide court defense lawyer claims prosecutor concealing evidence
Leslie Schulman on February 5, 2008 12:59 PM ET

[JURIST] A defense lawyer representing four ex-officers of the former Rwandan army facing trials before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) [official website] has accused Prosecutor Hassan Jallow [ICTR profile] of concealing evidence favorable to the defense, according to Monday media reports. Lawyer Christopher Black claims Jallow possesses witness statements indicating that Black's client, former Rwandan army general Augustin Ndindiliyimana [TrialWatch profile], helped protect Tutsi civilians during the 1994 Rwandan genocide [HRW backgrounder]. Black urged the court to sanction Jallow, to give Black access to Jallow's evidence database, to suspend the trial, and to temporarily release Ndindiliyimana pending further investigation into the alleged witness statements.
The ICTR was established to try genocide suspects for crimes occurring during the 1994 Rwandan conflict between Hutus and Tutsis in which approximately 800,000 people, primarily Tutsis, died. Hirondelle News Agency has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ urged to appoint special counsel to investigate missing White House e-mails
Michael Sung on February 5, 2008 9:54 AM ET

[JURIST] Private government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) [advocacy website] Tuesday urged US Attorney General Michael Mukasey [official website] to appoint a special counsel to investigate whether the White House had violated the Federal Records Act and the Presidential Records Act [texts] in failing to preserve millions of missing White House e-mails [JURIST news archive]. In September 2007 CREW sued the Executive Office of the President and the National Archives and Records Administration over their alleged failure to preserve e-mails [complaint, PDF; press release] throughout the Bush administration. In its Tuesday letter [PDF text; press release] to Mukasey, CREW said: The importance and historical significance of the missing email combined with the involvement of White House staff, make it imperative that the public have absolute confidence in whoever investigates this matter - the exact circumstance for which the special counsel provision was designed. The need for an impartial special counsel is all the more pronounced, in light of the recent history of improper White House involvement in, and politicization of, the work of the Department of Justice. For example, the administration has made clear that it will never allow the Department of Justice to pursue criminal contempt charges initiated by Congress against White House officials, including former White House Counsel Harriet Miers, and several US Attorneys were fired for refusing to politicize criminal investigations. Frankly, the Department of Justice does not have the credibility or demonstrated independence required to investigate potentially criminal conduct by White House officials. CREW also said that White House officials may have deliberately lost or tampered with email records to hide illegal conduct.
The US House of Representatives Government Oversight Committee has scheduled a hearing [JURIST report] for mid-February to look into White House compliance with the Presidential Records Act and to investigate the apparent contradiction between comments [press briefings; JURIST report] made in January by White House Deputy Press Secretary Fratto that no electronic messages had been lost between 2003 and 2005 and information congressional staffers heard last September that indicated that no electronic messages had been archived on nearly 500 days in different White House offices. The issue of missing e-mails has been an ongoing controversy in the Bush administration, arising first during the CIA leak investigation and again during the US Attorney firing scandal [JURIST news archives]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Leahy balks at Bush bid to shift new FOIA office to DOJ
Joshua Pantesco on February 5, 2008 9:33 AM ET

[JURIST] US Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on Monday criticized a provision in the Bush administration's proposed $3 trillion FY09 budget [White House materials] that would fund the newly created Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) through the Department of Justice (DOJ) rather than through the National Archives and Records Administration as originally intended. OGIS was established under the OPEN Government Act of 2007 [S 2488 materials], signed by President Bush in December 2007. According to the CRS summary [text] of the law, the Act: Establishes within the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) an Office of Government Information Services to: (1) review compliance with FOIA policies; (2) recommend policy changes to Congress and the President; and (3) offer mediation services between FOIA requesters and administrative agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. Authorizes the Office to issue advisory opinions if mediation has not resolved the dispute. Leahy, who sponsored the OPEN Government Act along with Senator John Cornyn (R-TX), said Monday that the FY09 budget indicates an intent to fund OGIS through the Justice Department [FY09 budget overview, PDF; DOJ appendix, PDF]. According to Leahy's statement [text]:Once again, the White House has shown they intend to act contrary to the intent of Congress by removing the Office of Government Information Services from the non-partisan, independent office of the National Archives and Records Administration and moving it to the Department of Justice. The President signed legislation into law to establish the OGIS to respond to long outstanding FOIA requests. Now the President has repealed part of the law he signed just over a month ago. I will continue to work through the appropriations process to make sure that the National Archives and Records Administration has the necessary resources and funds to comply with the OPEN Government Act, and we will continue to work in Congress to make necessary reforms to the Freedom of Information Act. One concern raised about maintaining the OGIS office under DOJ is that a conflict of interest would arise in cases where the DOJ is obligated to defend a government agency seeking to deny an FOIA request. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge upholds verdict, reduces award in military funeral protesters case
Joshua Pantesco on February 5, 2008 9:05 AM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge on Monday upheld a jury verdict [opinion, PDF] finding Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church [WARNING: readers may find some material offensive; BBC report] guilty of intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy for staging a protest at the funeral of Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder [case website]. Judge Richard Bennett of the US District Court for the District of Maryland rejected Westboro's argument that their activities enjoy absolute protection under the First Amendment: This Court has held and continues to hold that the First Amendment does not afford absolute protection to individuals committing acts directed at other private individuals. The Supreme Court of the United States has specifically held that First Amendment protection of particular types of speech must be balanced against a state's interest in protecting its residents from wrongful injury...Maryland particularly recognizes a cause of action protecting its residents from intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from outrageous conduct. Maryland also recognizes a cause of action for invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion when there is an unwarranted invasion of a persons privacy which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Bennett, however, reduced the jury award [JURIST report] from $11 million down to $5 million, as the church does not have the financial ability to pay $11 million in damages.
Westboro and its leader, Rev. Fred Phelps, have staged several protests at military funerals in recent years. In 2006, President Bush signed into law [JURIST report] the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act [HR 5037 summary; PDF text], prohibiting any demonstration within 300 feet of the entrance of a national cemetery and within 150 feet of an entrance into the cemetery for one hour before and after a military funeral. The Baltimore Examiner has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal court rejects White House exemptions to allow Navy sonar use
Joshua Pantesco on February 5, 2008 8:15 AM ET

[JURIST] A federal district court on Monday rejected the Bush administration's attempt to exempt the US Navy from environmental laws [JURIST report] so that the Navy could continue using sonar in its anti-submarine warfare training off the coast of southern California. Last month, President Bush issued a memorandum [text] exempting the Navy from the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) [text] and the Council on Environmental Quality authorized "alternative arrangements" [PDF text] for the Navy's compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [EPA materials] due to "emergency circumstances." The executive action came despite a November 2007 ruling [PDF text] by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that the Navy should limit its use of high-powered sonar [JURIST report].
In Monday's ruling [PDF text], Judge Florence Marie-Cooper of the US District Court for the Central District of California lifted a temporary partial stay [PDF text] issued earlier in the case. Marie-Cooper wrote: In this Order, the Court concludes that its preliminary injunction is not affected by the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) approval of emergency alternative arrangements because there is no emergency. The CEQ's action is beyond the scope of the regulation and is invalid. The Navy is not, therefore, exempted from compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and this Court's injunction.
This Court also expresses significant concerns about the constitutionality of the President's exemption of the Navy from the requirements of the Coastal Zone Management Act. However, because a finding on this issue is not necessary to the result reached, the Court adheres to the doctrine of constitutional avoidance and does not resolve that issue. A spokesperson for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) [advocacy website], which brought the original lawsuit to halt Navy sonar use due to harm caused to whales and other marine mammals, said [press release]:The Court has affirmed that we do not live under an imperial presidency. The Navy doesn't need to harm whales to train effectively with sonar. By following the carefully crafted measures ordered by the court, the Navy can conduct its exercises without imperiling marine mammals. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|