 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, December 20, 2007 |
 |
|


White House to appeal visitor logs release ruling
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 20, 2007 6:31 PM ET

[JURIST] The White House said Thursday that it will appeal a Monday ruling [opinion, PDF; order, PDF] that held White House visitor logs to be public documents [press release], asking a federal judge not to force the logs' disclosure in the meantime. On Monday, US District Judge Royce C. Lamberth rejected [JURIST report] a Bush administration bid to have the logs treated as confidential presidential records. Visitor logs are compiled by the Secret Service, and thus subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [text] requests; the Bush administration had ordered that the logs be submitted to the White House, so that they would fall outside the domain of FOIA. Watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) [advocacy website] brought the lawsuit, seeking logs regarding the White House visits of prominent conservative religious figures, including James Dobson and Jerry Falwell. AP has more.
In October, US District Judge Ricardo Urbina ordered the Secret Service to release visitor logs [JURIST report] for the personal residence and office of Vice-President Dick Cheney. The order was issued following a lawsuit by the Washington Post, which requested the logs in June while researching White House ties to political lobbyists. The Justice Department filed an appeal against the order [JURIST report] last week. In a second ruling [PDF text] issued Monday by Lamberth, the judge said that CREW could not seek an injunction [press release] preventing the Secret Service from destroying visitor logs after they are turned over to the White House.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US military judge rejects Hamdan POW status, allows military commission trial
Jeannie Shawl on December 20, 2007 5:42 PM ET

[JURIST] US military judge Navy Capt. Keith Allred ruled [PDF text] Wednesday that military commission proceedings against Guantanamo Bay detainee Salim Ahmed Hamdan [DOD materials; JURIST news archive] can proceed, denying a defense motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Allred had earlier agreed to hold a hearing to determine whether Hamdan should be considered a prisoner of war [JURIST report] under the Third Geneva Convention, but in the decision made available by the Defense Department Thursday, Allred concluded: The Government has carried its burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the accused is an alien unlawful enemy combatant, subject to the jurisdiction of a military commission. The Commission has separately conducted a status determination under Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention, and determined by a preponderance of the evidence that he is not a lawful combatant or entitled to Prisoner of War Status. There being no Constitutional impediment to the Commission's exercise of jurisdiction over him, the Defense Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED. The accused may be tried by military commission. In a statement [DOC text] from Hamdan's defense lawyers made available by SCOTUSblog, Hamdan's defense expressed disappointment at the ruling, but said:Much of the Commission's decision issued yesterday is, in our view, quite positive. Judge Allred ruled that as matter of international law, certain detainees at Guantanamo are entitled to Article 5 hearings under the Geneva Convention, and he found that Taliban and certain other participants captured during the armed conflict in Afghanistan, including al Qaeda fighters supporting the Taliban forces, may be deemed lawful combatants and therefore proper POW's who would not be subject to prosecution for war crimes under the Military Commissions Act. That is a ruling that may well have a substantial impact at Guantanamo, and other detainees in addition to Mr. Hamdan. Hamdan is accused of serving as a driver for Osama bin Laden before his capture and incarceration at Guantanamo Bay. Last year he successfully challenged the military commission system when the US Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] that the commissions as initially constituted violated US and international law. Congress subsequently passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and Hamdan again challenged the system, arguing that it still violates his rights, but the Supreme Court refused to hear his appeal [JURIST report] in October. He had hoped the Supreme Court would consider his case along with those of other detainees challenging their detention at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST report]. AP has more. SCOTUSblog has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

White House drops bid to control JAG promotions: Boston Globe
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 20, 2007 5:21 PM ET

[JURIST] The Bush administration is abandoning a plan to give political appointees in the Defense Department a role in the promotion of military lawyers [Boston Globe report; JURIST report] working as members of the Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps, the Boston Globe reported Wednesday. Critics of the proposed plan said that increased politicization of the promotion process would prevent JAGs from giving honest opinions on the legality of administration policy, especially regarding interrogation and the treatment of detainees. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell denied allegations that the proposal was meant to stifle JAG criticism of administration policies, telling the Globe that it was intended as a form of "quality control."
Some 4,000 lawyers work as JAGs across the military, and their hirings and promotions are currently determined by a board of military officers. Under the proposed regulation, first circulated by the Pentagon in November and recently obtained by the Globe, decisions on hiring and promotion would have been made in "coordination" with that branch of the military's general counsel, a political appointee, and the Pentagon. Tensions between political appointees and Pentagon military lawyers have in the past led to recriminations over scandals such as Abu Ghraib, and the insertion of a political appointee into the prosecution process for detainees at Guantanamo Bay led in October to the resignation of the top military prosecutor [JURIST reports] in charge of the war crimes trials there. The Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOD legal advisor denies Guantanamo prosecutor pressured for secret trials
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 20, 2007 4:47 PM ET

[JURIST] The legal advisor to the Convening Authority [official backgrounder] for Military Commissions at Guantanamo Bay, US Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas W.Hartmann [official profile], Wednesday denied accusations by former Guantanamo Bay chief military prosecutor Col. Morris Davis [official profile, PDF] that he was pressured to hold secret trials and that politics is interfering with Guantanamo prosecutions. In a Los Angeles Times op-ed [text], Hartman said that the slow progress that frustrated Davis was an unavoidable part of a careful judicial process. He also rejected Davis' allegations that aspects of the military commissions were being intentionally hidden from the public. Hartman said: Regarding his new allegations that the trials are not open, Davis knows that national security demands that certain evidence remain classified. He had an especially high security clearance for that very reason. But there will be no "secret" trials. Though we must safeguard classified information in order to protect ongoing operations and our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, not one piece of evidence will go to a commission jury without review and the opportunity to object by the accused and his counsel.
Military commissions are now moving forward fairly and transparently. As they continue, critics will see uniformed service members, including judges, prosecutors and defense counsel, conduct trials with the dignity, fairness, and respect for law that defines American military justice a justice system that remains the envy of the world. In October, Davis told the New York Times that he was pressured to use classified evidence [JURIST report] against defendants in closed war crimes trials for detainees.
Also in October, Davis said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that Guantanamo prosecutions were becoming politicized [WSJ report; JURIST report]. Davis said that recently-approved rules governing prosecutions at Guantanamo [JURIST news archive] result in the chief prosecutor reporting [PDF memo text] via the Legal Advisor to the Convening Authority to the Pentagon general counsel [PDF memo text], a presidential appointee. Davis said he filed an internal complaint about this structure, but the complaint was rejected. Shortly thereafter, he resigned [JURIST report] in protest.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Real IRA suspect acquitted of 1998 Omagh bombing
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 20, 2007 4:01 PM ET

[JURIST] A judge in Belfast, Northern Ireland, Thursday found alleged Real IRA [BBC backgrounder] member Sean Gerard Hoey not guilty [judgment text, PDF] of murder in relation to the 1998 Omagh bombing [BBC backgrounder], the worst terrorist attack in Northern Ireland history. Judge Reginald Weir ruled that there was insufficient DNA evidence linking Hoey to the bomb to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he made the device. Hoey was formally charged [JURIST report] in 2005; he had been being held for earlier charges of possessing explosives and his alleged membership with the Real IRA.
The only other conviction made in connection with the Omagh bombing was in 2002 against Colm Murphy, but it was later quashed for mishandling of evidence [JURIST report]. Murphy faces a retrial. In 2005, the Irish Public Prosecution Service dropped charges [JURIST report] against another suspect, Anthony Joseph Donegan. Twenty-nine people were killed and 220 were injured when a car bomb [BBC backgrounder] set by the Real IRA, a splinter group of the former provisional Irish Republican Army opposed to the peace process, exploded in the Northern Ireland town of Omagh in 1998. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US Senate approves tougher sanctions against Myanmar
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 20, 2007 3:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate passed the Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2007 [HR 3890 materials] Wednesday, a bill that would impose new economic sanctions and travel restrictions on leaders from Myanmar [JURIST news archive]. The bill is intended to push the military government to restore democratic rule. US Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE), one of the sponsors of the Senate version of the sanctions bill, praised the passage of the legislation [press release], which he described: The Burma Democracy Promotion Act imposes new financial sanctions and travel restrictions on the leaders of the junta and their associates. In addition, the legislation tightens the economic sanctions Congress imposed in 2003 by outlawing the importation of Burmese gems and timber to the United States. The bill also creates a new position of Special Representative and Policy Coordinator for Burma. The Special Representative will work with Burma's neighbors and other interested countries, including the members of the European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, to develop a comprehensive approach to the problem, including pressure, dialogue, and support for non-governmental organizations providing humanitarian relief to the Burmese people. The House has already passed a version of the bill but must still approve minor differences with the Senate-passed version. US President George W. Bush has indicated that he will sign the bill.
The UN General Assembly Third Committee passed [JURIST report] a draft resolution [press release] last month condemning the recent crackdown against political dissidents in Myanmar, calling on the country's military government to release all political prisoners. The crackdown started when Myanmar security officers arrested hundreds of Buddhist monks demonstrating against rising fuel prices and human rights abuses by the military regime. At least 10 people were killed when government soldiers shot into protesting crowds [JURIST report] and the government has said that some 3,000 people were arrested for participating in the protests. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN General Assembly adopts resolution against defamation of religions
Brett Murphy on December 20, 2007 1:34 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN General Assembly has passed a resolution [draft text, PDF] against "defamation of religion," expressing concern about laws that have led to religions discrimination and profiling since Sept. 11. The resolution urges all: States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and their value systems and to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance. The resolution, supported by the Organization of the Islamic Conference [official website], passed Tuesday by a vote of 108-51 [press release, see Annex X], with 25 abstentions. Many Western nations and other democracies opposed the resolution.
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf called for the resolution [JURIST report] in the General Assembly last year, citing feelings in the Muslim world of "desperation and injustice" in the wake of the Danish publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad [JURIST news archive]. The UN Human Rights Council passed a similar resolution [JURIST report] opposing defamation of Islam in March, with many of the same western nations standing in opposition. CNS News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Mukasey memo limits DOJ case discussions with White House
Jeannie Shawl on December 20, 2007 1:32 PM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Michael Mukasey [official profile; JURIST news archive] sent a memo to top Justice Department staff Wednesday advising them of a shift in DOJ policy that will limit who can discuss ongoing investigations with the White House. After he was nominated as attorney general, Mukasey promised that the DOJ would maintain greater independence [JURIST report] from the White House, saying that he would forbid DOJ employees from discussing sensitive cases with outside agencies. In his memo, Mukasey said that communications with the White House about ongoing cases will be limited to cases that are determined to be necessary to the president's ability to carry out his constitutional responsibilities. Only Mukasey or the deputy attorney general will be authorized to initiate discussions with White House staff, and then only with the White House counsel or deputy counsel. If necessary, a DOJ aide can be designated to continue discussions, but Mukasey wrote that the "designation will be limited to the fewest number of people practicable." In addition, the associate attorney general and solicitor general will be authorized in limited circumstances to discuss civil lawsuits and appeals without prior authorization from Mukasey or his deputy.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), one of the senators who led the call for a policy change, praised Mukasey's memo. According to a press release from his office: "Today's new policy is a clear, unmistakable and welcome repudiation of the Gonzales era, and this change takes a significant step towards restoring Americans' confidence in the integrity of our justice system," Whitehouse said. "I'm encouraged that Attorney General Mukasey has honored his commitment to begin restoring the firewall against White House politicization at the Department."
In the Clinton administration, a total of only seven people at the White House and the Justice Department were permitted to initiate discussions of ongoing cases or investigations, including the President, Vice President, and Attorney General. During the tenure of Attorney General John Ashcroft, that policy changed to authorize more than 40 people at the Department and more than 400 people in the White House to initiate such conversations, opening up unrestricted channels for political interference. According to Whitehouse, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales later "signed a 2006 memorandum further expanding the authority to discuss cases to over 900 people in the executive branch, explicitly including the chief of staff and counsel to the Vice President." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China ex-prosecutor gets suspended death sentence for taking bribes
Jeannie Shawl on December 20, 2007 1:19 PM ET

[JURIST] A Chinese court has sentenced former prosecutor Li Baojin to death after convicting him Wednesday of accepting bribes and embezzling money. Li was found guilty of accepting $760,000 in bribes over a 10-year period while he worked as chief prosecutor and deputy police chief in Tianjin, as well as embezzling $1.9 million from the prosecutor's office. A court official, speaking anonymously, said that the death sentence will be suspended for two years, after which the sentence could be commuted to life in prison if Li demonstrates good behavior.
China has taken a hard line on corruption in recent months, punishing several officials with lengthy prison terms and the death penalty [JURIST report]. In September, a former official of the Agricultural Bank of China was executed [JURIST report] for taking bribes and embezzling nearly $2 million. In July, the former commissioner of China's State Food and Drug Administration was executed for accepting $850,000 in bribes [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|