 |
|

Legal news from Monday, December 17, 2007 |
 |
|


Federal judge rules White House visitor logs are public records
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 17, 2007 4:52 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge ruled [opinion, PDF; order, PDF] Monday that White House visitor logs are public documents [press release], rejecting a Bush administration bid to have the logs treated as confidential presidential records. Visitor logs are compiled by the Secret Service, and thus subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [text] requests; the Bush administration had ordered that the logs be submitted to the White House, so that they would fall outside the domain of FOIA. Watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) [advocacy website] brought the lawsuit, seeking logs regarding the White House visits of prominent conservative religious figures, including James Dobson and Jerry Falwell. AP has more.
In October, US District Judge Ricardo Urbina ordered the Secret Service to release visitor logs [JURIST report] for the personal residence and office of Vice-President Dick Cheney. The order was issued following a lawsuit by the Washington Post, which requested the logs in June while researching White House ties to political lobbyists. The Justice Department filed an appeal against the order [JURIST report] last week.
12/18/2007 - In a second ruling [PDF text] issued Monday by US District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, the judge said that CREW could not seek an injunction [press release] preventing the Secret Service from destroying visitor logs after they are turned over to the White House.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Argentina president fires coast guard chief following death of 'Dirty War' suspect
Leslie Schulman on December 17, 2007 3:54 PM ET

[JURIST] Incoming Argentinian President Cristina Fernandez [personal website, in Spanish] Monday dismissed Argentinian coast guard head Carlos Fernandez, one week after former Argentinian coast guard officer and torture suspect Hector Febres was found dead [AP report] in his military jail cell with high levels of cyanide in his blood. Febres went to trial in October [JURIST report] on charges of kidnapping and torturing four people at the Navy Mechanics School [BBC backgrounder] during Argentina's Dirty War [Global Security backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. He was the first person to face trial for human rights violations at the school, the largest secret prison run by the Argentinian military during the 1976-83 Dirty War campaign. The trial's verdict had been expected this past Friday and if convicted, Febres would have faced life in prison. His wife and two grown children were detained for questioning [AP report] following his death.
Last month, outgoing Argentinian President Nestor Kirchner dedicated a new monument [JURIST report] to victims of the Dirty War, on which the names of thousands of victims are engraved. The monument sits beside the Rio de la Plata, where drugged prisoners who were suspected of "subversion" were thrown to their deaths. Kirchner used the occasion to urge Argentinian courts to move along trials against former members of the military regime more quickly. The former president also promised that Cristina Fernandez, his wife and successor to the presidency, would continue his policy of pushing for accountability. Fernandez, elected in October, was sworn into office [AP report] last Monday, the same day Febres was found dead. AP has more. La Nacion has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Zimbabwe amends controversial public order law
Mike Rosen-Molina on December 17, 2007 3:25 PM ET

[JURIST] The government of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe [BBC profile] has amended the controversial Public Order and Security Act [PDF text], according to Monday media reports. The law prohibits public political gatherings without prior police approval. If police turn down a party's application to hold a rally, the party can appeal its case to the Minister of Home Affairs [official website], whom opposition forces say is biased as a member of the ruling party. Under the new amendments, political parties will be able to appeal to a magistrate instead. Police will also be required to explain their reasons for denying rally permits. Mugabe's ruling ZANU-PF [Wikipedia backgrounder] party and the opposition Movement for Democratic Change [party website] agreed to the amendments after a summit mediated by South African President Thabo Mbeki.
In the past, Zimbabwe has used the Public Order and Security Act to crack down on anti-government protests. In May, police in Harare arrested [JURIST report] members of the National Constitutional Assembly [official website] who protested against proposed amendments to the Zimbabwean Constitution [PDF text], later passed and signed into law [JURIST report], which essentially allow Mugabe to pick his successor. That same month, Zimbabwean police broke up a rally of about 50 lawyers who had gathered to protest the the arrest and imprisonment of two human rights advocates; the lawyers argued that the Public Order and Security Act exempted them from a general ban against demonstrations [JURIST reports]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iran charges women's rights activists with terrorism
Leslie Schulman on December 17, 2007 3:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Iran [JURIST news archive] has charged women's rights activists Ronak Safarzadeh and Hana Abdi with acting "against national security" by allegedly participating in terrorist acts, an Iranian judge said Sunday. The two women were arrested [RFE/RL report] in October and are accused of having connections to Kurdish leftist group Party for Free Life in Kurdistan (PJAK) [Global Security backgrounder] and of using their feminist advocacy as a front for terror activity. Iranian officials denied that their arrest was related to their opposition to "discriminatory" laws against women. Safarzadeh and Abdi were arrested following their involvement with a campaign to help collect one million signatures [advocacy website] protesting Iran's interpretation of Sharia law [BBC backgrounder], under which women must obtain their male guardian's permission to work or travel, are prohibited from serving as judges, and their testimony is given only half the value of a man's. Amnesty International [advocacy website] has called for action [amnesty report] against their detention, saying that they were detained "solely for the peaceful exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and association."
Last June, hundreds of women's rights activists participated in peaceful demonstrations [RFE/RL report] in Tehran protesting Iranian laws that discriminate against women. The protests turned violent when police detained more than 70 people. Several leading women's rights activists were sentenced for "acting against national security" and "advertising against the system," including activist Delaram Ali [advocacy profile; personal blog], who was sentenced to 34 months in prison and 10 lashes [JURIST report]. Ali's sentenced was temporarily suspended [JURIST report] last month while officials decide whether to review her case. Five other women involved in the demonstration were given jail terms of up to a year, with suspended sentences of up to three years. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New Jersey governor signs bill abolishing death penalty
Jeannie Shawl on December 17, 2007 11:15 AM ET

[JURIST] New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine on Monday signed into law [press release] a bill ending the use of capital punishment [PDF text], making New Jersey the first state to abolish the use of the death penalty since the US Supreme Court reinstated it nationally in 1976. The legislation was passed by the New Jersey Assembly last week, just days after being approved by the state Senate [JURIST reports]. During Monday's signing ceremony [press release], Corzine said: Today New Jersey evolves. This is a day of progress for us and for the millions of people across our nation and around the globe who reject the death penalty as a moral or practical response to the grievous, even heinous, crime of murder. I have been moved by the passionate views on both sides of this issue, and I firmly believe that replacing the death penalty with life in prison without parole best captures our State's highest values and reflects our best efforts to search for true justice. Eight inmates were on New Jersey's death row when the legislation was passed by the state legislature, but Corzine commuted their sentences Sunday to life in prison without parole.
Bill proponents, including Corzine, have argued that capital punishment spends more tax dollars than life in prison without parole [NJ Senate report, PDF; NYT op-ed], and say that capital punishment statistically does not deter homicide. A report [PDF text; JURIST report] released in January and endorsed by 12 of the 13 members of the New Jersey Death Penalty Commission [official website] concluded that there was "no compelling evidence that the New Jersey death penalty rationally serves a legitimate penological intent," although there was "increasing evidence that the death penalty is inconsistent with evolving standards of decency." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

White House seeking control over JAG promotions: Boston Globe
Jeannie Shawl on December 17, 2007 10:58 AM ET

[JURIST] The Bush administration has proposed a draft regulation that would give political appointees in the Defense Department a role in the promotion of military lawyers working as members of the Judge Advocate General Corps, the Boston Globe reported over the weekend. Some 4,000 lawyers work as JAGs across the military, and their hirings and promotions are currently determined by a board of military officers. Under the proposed regulation, first circulated by the Pentagon in November and recently obtained by the Globe, decisions on hiring and promotion would be made in "coordination" with that branch of the military's general counsel, a political appointee, and the Pentagon. Critics of the proposal say that increased politicization of the promotion process would prevent JAGs from giving honest opinions on the legality of administration policy, especially regarding interrogation and the treatment of detainees. Tensions between political appointees and Pentagon military lawyers have in the past led to recriminations over scandals such as Abu Ghraib [JURIST report], and the insertion of a political appointee into the prosecution process for detainees at Guantanamo Bay led in October to the resignation of the top military prosecutor [JURIST reports] in charge of the war crimes trials there.
The proposal is not yet final, and a decision whether to adopt the regulations, which also revise promotion procedures for all commissioned officers in the military, is expected by early next year. The Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House panel to probe CIA destruction of interrogation videos despite DOJ request
Jeannie Shawl on December 17, 2007 10:18 AM ET

[JURIST] The ranking member of the US House Select Committee on Intelligence [official website] said Sunday that the committee would proceed with its investigation into the CIA's destruction of videotapes [JURIST report] showing the interrogation of terror suspects, despite the Justice Department's advice that the CIA not cooperate with the probe and request that the committee delay its investigation pending the Justice Department's own investigation [JURIST reports] into the circumstances surrounding the tapes' destruction. In an appearance on Fox News Sunday [transcript], Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) said that it was important to hold the intelligence community accountable: WALLACE: On Friday, the Justice Department moved to block congressional investigations of the destruction of these CIA tapes, saying that it would jeopardize its own probe.
Congressman Hoekstra, does that mean your committee is going to stand down?
HOEKSTRA: No, I don't think so. I think what we're going to do is we want to hold the community accountable for what's happened with these tapes. I think we will issue subpoenas.
And once these witness appear in front of the committee, then I think we'll have to make the decision as to whether we're going to provide them with immunity or not. But our investigation should move forward.
WALLACE: So you're going to defy the letter that you got from the Justice Department.
HOEKSTRA: I think so. I mean, obviously, I need to talk with the chairman of the committee about that, but that directionally is where I would like to go, absolutely.
WALLACE: Why?
HOEKSTRA: Because I think it's important for Congress to hold this community accountable. You know, this community did not tell the CIA did not tell us about the existence of these tapes. They did not tell us that they were going to be destroyed.
There's a constitutional responsibility for them to keep Congress informed, and they have not, and we need to hold them accountable. The parts of this investigation that are being handled by justice that's a different issue.
But we need to hold them accountable because they did not respond and they did not perform the way we expected them to. Also appearing on the program was Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), chair of the intelligence subcommittee of the House Committee on Homeland Security, who said that she personally advised the CIA not to destroy the videotapes and that Congress was not informed when the tapes were destroyed.
CIA Director Michael Hayden acknowledged [statement text] earlier this month that the CIA had videotaped the interrogation of two terror suspects in 2002, but said that the tapes had been destroyed in 2005 amid concerns that they could be leaked to the public and compromise the identities of the interrogators. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|