 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, November 21, 2007 |
 |
|


Musharraf amends Pakistan constitution to bar legal challenges to emergency
Bernard Hibbitts on November 21, 2007 7:47 PM ET

[JURIST] Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf promulgated an ordinance Wednesday invoking his power to unilaterally amend the country's constitution under Article 2(1) of the current Provisional Constitution Order [text as amended] and making the November 3 declaration of emergency and accompanying orders immune from any legal challenge by deeming them always to have been validly made. The Constitution (Amendment) Order, 2007 [text] provides that Article 270 of the now-suspended Pakistani constitution is amended to include the following provision: 270AAA. Validation and affirmation of laws etc.-
(1) The proclamation of Emergency of 3rd November, 2007, all President's Orders, Ordinances, Chief of Army Staff Orders, including the Provisional Constitution order No.1 2007, the Oath of Office (Judges) Order, 2007, the amendments made in the constitution through the Constitution (Amendment) Order, 2007 and all other laws made between the 3rd day of November, 2007 and the date on which the Proclamation of Emergency of the 3rd Day of November, 2007, is revoked (both days inclusive), are accordingly affirmed, adopted and declared to have been validly made by the competent authority and notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution shall not be called in question in any court or forum on any ground whatsoever.
(2) All orders made, proceedings taken, appointments made, including secondments and deputations, and acts done by any authority, or by any person, which were made, taken or done, or purported to have been made, taken or done, on or after the 3rd day of November, 2007 in exercise of the powers derived from any Proclamation, Provisional Constitution Order No. 1 of 2007, President's orders, ordinances, enactments, including amendments in the Constitution, notifications, rules, orders, bye-laws, or in execution of or in compliance with any orders made or sentences passed by any authority in the exercise or purported exercise of powers as aforesaid, shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution or any judgment of any court, be deemed to be and always to have been validly made, taken or done and shall not be called in question in any court or forum on any ground whatsoever.
(3) All proclamations, President's orders, ordinances, Chief of Army Staff Orders, laws, regulations, enactments, including amendments in the Constitution, notifications, rules, orders or bye-laws in force immediately before the date on which the Proclamation of Emergency of the 3rd day of November, 2007 is revoked, shall continue in force until altered, repealed or amended by the competent authority.
Explanation.- In this clause, "competent authority" means,- (a) in respect of President's orders, ordinances, Chief of Army Staff Orders and enactments, including amendments in the Constitution, the appropriate Legislature; and (b) in respect of notifications, rules, orders and bye-laws, the authority in which the power to make, alter, repeal or amend the same vests under the law.
(4) No prosecution or any other legal proceedings, including but not limited to suits, constitutional petitions or complaints, shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution or any other law for the time being in force, lie in any court, forum or authority against any person or authority on account of or in respect of issuance of the legal instruments referred to in clause (1) and on account of or in respect of any action taken by the Chief of Army Staff, the President or any other in exercise or purported exercise of the powers referred to in clause (2).
(5) For purpose of clauses (1), (2) and (4) all orders made, proceeding taken, appointments made, including secondments and deputation, acts done or purporting to be made, taken or done by any authority or person shall be deemed to have been made, taken in good faith and for the purpose intended to be served thereby. The Order appears to have been issued in contemplation of the eventual reinstatement of Pakistan's constitution after the current proclamation of emergency is revoked and would effectively hold harmless the proclamation's authors and enforcers. The News has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Prosecutors argue against bail in Khmer Rouge genocide tribunal hearing
Caitlin Price on November 21, 2007 4:08 PM ET

[JURIST] Prosecutors argued before a hearing of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website; JURIST news archive] Wednesday that former Khmer Rouge official Kaing Guek Eav [TrialWatch profile] should be denied bail to prevent violence that could threaten public order. Lawyers said that Kaing Guek Eav, better known as "Duch," is a flight risk and, if released, could be targeted for a revenge killing by relatives of Khmer Rouge genocide victims. Duch has contested his eight-year pre-trial detention [JURIST report] as a violation of international law, and has requested to be released on bail in the months before his as-yet unscheduled trial. A decision is not expected for several days, but ECCC judges have indicated that they do not have jurisdiction to determine the legality of Duch's detention.
Duch, who was in charge of the notorious S-21 prison [Wikipedia backgrounder] in Phnom Penh, is one of five top leaders of the Khmer Rouge regime [JURIST news archive; BBC backgrounder] currently in ECCC custody. Duch was arrested in 1999 on genocide charges; he was subsequently charged with war crimes by a military court in March and with crimes against humanity [JURIST reports] by the ECCC in July. Those charges were primarily brought to keep Duch in custody while the ECCC started operations. Also Wednesday, the tribunal expressed concern for the safety of former Khmer Rouge head of state Khieu Samphan [JURIST report] if released. AP has more. AFP has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Georgia high court rejects sex offender residence law
Mike Rosen-Molina on November 21, 2007 3:36 PM ET

[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Georgia [official website] Wednesday unanimously overturned [opinion, PDF; summary, PDF] a state law that prohibited registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of schools, playgrounds and other areas where children gather. Civil rights groups had criticized the law [legislative materials] as overly strict, saying that the state's roughly 11,000 registered sex offenders would have been barred from living in almost any residential area. State Rep. Jerry Keen (R) [official profile], who sponsored the law, expressed disappointment in the court's ruling and said that state lawmakers may readdress the issue in January.
The Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) [advocacy website], which represented the plaintiffs in a federal class-action lawsuit [complaint, PDF; SCHR materials] against the law, had argued that the law violated several constitutional provisions and at least one federal statute. The law was passed last year and went into effect on July 1, 2006, but in June 2006 US District Judge Clarence Cooper [official profile] issued a temporary restraining order [brief in support, PDF; JURIST report] that prevented the state from enforcing the law against eight plaintiffs, and then later extended the restraining order to all registered sex offenders in the state [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN committee urges Iran to respect rights obligations
Caitlin Price on November 21, 2007 2:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN General Assembly Third Committee Tuesday approved [UN press release] a draft resolution [PDF text] imploring Iran [JURIST news archive] to "respect fully its human rights obligations." The draft expressed concern about ongoing human rights violations in Iran despite previous resolutions condemning acts including torture, public executions, and discrimination against minorities and women. The draft calls on the Iranian government: a) To eliminate, in law and in practice, amputations and flogging and other forms of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; (b) To abolish, in law and in practice, public executions and other executions carried out in the absence of respect for internationally recognized safeguards; (c) To abolish, in law and in practice, the use of stoning as a method of execution; (d) To abolish [...] executions of persons who at the time of their offence were under the age of 18; (e) To eliminate, in law and in practice, all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls; (f) To eliminate, in law and in practice, all forms of discrimination and other human rights violations against persons belonging to religious, ethnic, linguistic or other minorities, recognized or otherwise, to refrain from monitoring individuals on the basis of their religious beliefs, and to ensure that access of minorities to education and employment is on par with that of all Iranians; (g) To implement, inter alia, the 1996 report of the Special Rapporteur on religious intolerance,6 which recommended ways in which the Islamic Republic of Iran could emancipate the Baha'i community; (h) To end the harassment, intimidation and persecution of political opponents and human rights defenders, including by releasing persons imprisoned arbitrarily or on the basis of their political views; [and] (i) To uphold due process of law rights, and to end impunity for human rights violations. The committee passed the resolution with a vote of 72-50, with 55 abstentions. Iranian UN Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee [official website] criticized main resolution sponsor Canada - with which Iran has recently had a rocky relationship [JURIST news archive] on rights matters - for relying on "illusionary and nonexisting claims and allegations" to garner support. The resolution now moves to a vote in the General Assembly.
The General Assembly passed its most recent resolution addressing Iranian human rights violations [PDF text] in December 2006; it was widely believed to be ineffective. Tuesday's draft resolution encouraged Iran to allow visits of Human Rights Council special procedures [official website], who have been excluded since July 2005. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Khadr trial could set precedent for prosecution of minors: UN representative
Mike Rosen-Molina on November 21, 2007 2:28 PM ET

[JURIST] UN Special Representative for the Children and Armed Conflict Unit Radhika Coomaraswamy [official profile] Tuesday expressed concern about the prosecution of Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr [JURIST news archive], saying that prosecuting Khadr for alleged war crimes committed while he was a minor could set a dangerous precedent. Coomaraswamy made the comments to US State Department legal adviser John Bellinger [official profile], but no word is available on Bellinger's response. Human rights groups have criticized the US for proceeding with the trial, saying that it violates the Optional Protocol of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child [text], which gives special protection to children under 18 involved in armed conflicts.
A spokesperson said that Coomaraswamy has also had discussions with officials in Canada, Khadr's home nation, which has so far declined to intervene on Khadr's behalf. Khadr military defense lawyer Lt.-Cmdr. William Kuebler is currently in London asking MPs and human rights activists to push the Canadian government to call for Khadr's extradition [Globe and Mail report]. CBC News has more.
On Wednesday, five news organizations - the Associated Press, the New York Times Co., Dow Jones & Company Inc., the Hearst Corp. and the McClatchy Company [corporate websites] - said they were being blocked from substantial portions of the military commission proceeding against Khadr. In a court filing, the news groups said that many of the motions and arguments in Khadr's case are being made via e-mail or in closed sessions, meaning that there are no public records of what is discussed. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US judge mulls new terror trial for Muslim cleric after Moussaoui evidence revelations
Mike Rosen-Molina on November 21, 2007 12:38 PM ET

[JURIST] The US federal judge who presided over the Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] terrorism conspiracy case suggested from the bench Tuesday that she might order a new trial for a Muslim cleric convicted of soliciting treason, saying that she could no longer trust representations made by the US government in light of recent revelations that it had withheld evidence [JURIST report] during the Moussaoui proceeding. At a post-trial hearing for Muslim cleric Ali al-Timimi [WP profile; JURIST news archive], US District Judge Leonie Brinkema said she felt she could no longer count on the CIA and other government agencies to accurately disclose classified evidence in terror cases. Al-Timimi, an Islamic scholar from Fairfax, Virginia, was sentenced to life in prison [JURIST report] in July 2005 after he was convicted of soliciting others to levy war against the US, inducing others to aid the Taliban, and inducing others to use firearms in violation of federal law.
Last week, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] admitted in a letter [PDF text] that it has several recorded interrogations of suspected "enemy combatants", contrary to its denial of assertions in the Moussaoui case that it possessed one audio and two video interrogation tapes. Moussaoui had sought the testimony of several al Qaeda witnesses as part of his defense. Prosecutors said that they learned of the tapes only recently, but insisted that their absence did not affect Moussaoui's trial, as they did not mention either him or the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks [JURIST news archive]. AP has more.
Moussaoui pleaded guilty [JURIST report] in April 2005 to six conspiracy charges [indictment] in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks, including conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries, conspiracy to destroy aircraft and conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction. He received a life sentence [JURIST report] last year after one juror refused to agree to the death penalty [JURIST report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|