Federal appeals court considers Virginia 'partial-birth' abortion ban Patrick Porter at 1:13 PM ET
[JURIST] A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard arguments Thursday on whether a 2003 Virginia law banning so-called partial-birth abortions is constitutional. In a 2-1 split in 2005, a panel of judges on the same court ruled the law unconstitutional [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] because it lacked an an exception to protect the mother's health. Virginia Solicitor General William E. Thro appealed that ruling in light of a Supreme Court decision [text; JURIST report] earlier this year upholding a similar federal law [PDF text] which also lacks a health exception. Lawyers for the Center for Reproductive Rights argued that the Virginia law is distinct and still unconstitutional. The Richmond Times-Dispatch has more.
The D&E abortion procedure is often called "partial-birth" abortion [JURIST news archive] by abortion opponents because the undeveloped fetus is partially extracted from the uterus before the abortion is performed. In June, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down a Michigan "partial-birth" abortion ban [JURIST report], because it deviated from the express limitations established in the April Supreme Court decision.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.