 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, September 25, 2007 |
 |
|


ACLU challenges US exclusion of South Africa scholar
Leslie Schulman on September 25, 2007 6:27 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF; press release] in federal court Tuesday against the US Department of State and the US Department of Homeland Security [official websites], alleging that the US government is illegally preventing South African scholar and professor Adam Habib [academic profile] from entering the country. According to the ACLU, Habib had traveled freely to and from the US, frequently speaking at universities and organizations, until his visa was suddenly revoked last October. Last month, the ACLU criticized [press release] the State Department for failing to reissue Habib's US visa. Tuesday's complaint alleges that Habib, who is an outspoken critic of US terrorism policies and the war in Iraq, is being censored at the border for political reasons, and that his exclusion violates the First Amendment rights of US citizens and organizations who are being denied his perspectives.
Last year, the ACLU brought a similar lawsuit [JURIST report] against the US for denying Swiss Muslim scholar Tariq Ramadan [ACLU profile] entry into the United States under the ideological exclusion provision [ACLU backgrounder; CIS report] of the Patriot Act [JURIST news archive]. Ramadan was unable to accept speaking invitations at various functions and a teaching invitation at the University of Notre Dame in 2004 after his visa was revoked. The ACLU launched a new website [advocacy website] Tuesday, profiling other scholars and politicians that have been similarly kept out of the US. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Getty Museum signs agreement to return looted Italy antiquities
Leslie Schulman on September 25, 2007 6:10 PM ET

[JURIST] The Getty Museum [official website] Tuesday signed [press release] a formal agreement with the Italian Ministry of Culture Heritage and Activities [official website] to return 40 allegedly looted Italian artifacts [list of objects, PDF] to Italy over the next several months. In exchange, Italian officials agreed to drop a civil lawsuit against former Getty Museum curator Marion True. Criminal charges against her, which allege she knowingly acquired illegally obtained and smuggled artifacts, will proceed. True has denied the allegations, as have Getty officials.
The agreement was initially announced [JURIST report] last month, after the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities threatened to suspend all Italian collaboration with the Getty if an agreement was not reached by August. Italian authorities have insisted that, pursuant to a 1939 Italian law, all archaeological artifacts excavated in Italy belong to the Italian state, and that many items recovered in international waters were nevertheless exported illegally from Italy. Italy first demanded [JURIST report] last year that the Getty return all antiquities alleged to have been looted. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pentagon to move ahead on Khadr trial after court approves jurisdiction
Caitlin Price on September 25, 2007 2:50 PM ET

[JURIST] The Pentagon Tuesday declared its intention to "expeditiously" move forward with the trial of Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr [JURIST news archive], following a Monday decision [PDF text] from the Court of Military Commissions Review (USCMCR) [DOD materials] granting jurisdiction to military trial judges to hear the case. In June, a military commission judge dropped terrorism charges [order, PDF; JURIST report] against Khadr, ruling that the court had no jurisdiction because a Guantanamo Combatant Status Review Tribunal [DOD materials] had found that Khadr was an "enemy combatant," not an "unlawful enemy combatant" as required under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) [PDF text]. The appeals court reversed that ruling, finding that the distinction was purely semantic; that the military judge had the power to hear evidence concerning, and ultimately decide, Khadr's "unlawful enemy combatant" status; and that the language of MCA Section 949a(a) and 948b(c) clearly show that Congress intended for military commissions to "apply the principles of law" and "the procedures for trial [routinely utilized] by general courts-martial..." This would include the common procedures used before general courts-martial permitting military judges to hear evidence and decide factual and legal matters concerning the court's own jurisdiction over the accused appearing before it. The USCMCR reinstated [JURIST report] the charges against Khadr, and the Pentagon said it expects prosecutors in that and other military commissions cases to quickly move toward trial [AFPS report].
Khadr was detained in Afghanistan in 2002 after allegedly throwing a grenade that killed one US soldier and wounded another while fighting with the Taliban. He was only 15 at the time. After earlier proceedings against him were effectively quashed by the US Supreme Court's rejection of presidentially-established military commissions as unconstitutional he was formally recharged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] in April under the new Military Commissions Act with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism, as well as spying. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush urges UN members to respect human rights declaration
Alexis Unkovic on September 25, 2007 1:48 PM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush [JURIST news archive] Tuesday addressed the UN General Assembly [official website] and called on fellow member states to abide by the dictates of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights [text] by opposing dictatorships and aiding countries seeking to establish democracies. In his speech [PDF text; recorded video] at the opening of the General Assembly's 62nd session [UN materials], Bush also urged the UN to reform its Human Rights Council (UNHRC) [official website; JURIST news archive], established in 2006 to replace [JURIST report] the UN Human Rights Commission [official website], which was often criticized for allowing states with poor human rights records to become members.
In addition, Bush opened the door Tuesday to the possibility that the US may support the expansion of the UN Security Council [official website] to include members such as Japan: Some have also called for reform to the structure of the Security Council, including an expansion of its membership. The United States is open to this prospect. We believe that Japan is well-qualified for permanent membership on the Security Council, and that other nations should be considered, as well. The United States will listen to all good ideas, and we will support changes to the Security Council as part of broader U.N. reform. And in all we do, I call on member states to work for an institution that adheres to strict ethical standards, and lives up to the high principles of the Universal Declaration. Bush also announced in his speech that the US would impose economic sanctions against the military government of Myanmar [JURIST news archive], formerly known as "Burma," in addition to a visa ban on alleged human rights [JURIST news archive] violators from that country. In another controversial comment, Bush said that "the long rule of a cruel dictator is nearing its end" in reference to the rule of Fidel Castro in Cuba, reportedly causing Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque to storm out of the chamber. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court takes 17 cases for October Term 2007
James M Yoch Jr on September 25, 2007 11:27 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday granted certiorari [orders list, PDF] in 17 cases for the October Term 2007, among them notable cases dealing with lethal injection, voter ID laws and subsequently seized evidence. In Baze v. Rees (07-5439) [docket; cert. petition], the Court will consider whether lethal injections of death row inmates constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. At issue is the three-drug mixture [DPIC backgrounder] of an anesthetic, a muscle paralyzer and a substance to stop the heart used in Kentucky and 36 other states. Opponents of the method claim that it does not contain enough anesthetic to relieve pain; however, the Kentucky Supreme Court in upholding the injection [JURIST report] last November ruled that the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not ban all pain. Last week, a federal judge in Tennessee held [JURIST report] that the state's execution protocols, which use the same three-drug cocktail, violate the Eighth Amendment because they do not ensure that prisoners are properly anesthetized before they receive a lethal injection. AP has more.
In two other cases, the Court will hear challenges to the constitutionality of Indiana's controversial voter identification statute [Indiana SOS backgrounder, PDF] that requires voters to present photo identification as a prerequisite to voting. The cases, Crawford v. Marion City Election Board (07-21) [docket; cert. petition], and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita (07-25) [docket; cert. petition], pit those who believe the law prevents voter fraud against opponents who believe the legislation makes it difficult for minorities and impoverished voters to participate in elections. In January, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld [JURIST report] the law, ruling that it does not put an undue burden on the right to vote and therefore does not violate the US Constitution. The US Supreme Court confronted the issue of voter ID laws last term. In October 2006, the Court ruled in a per curiam opinion [PDF text] that Arizona could enforce its voter ID law [JURIST report], which requires voters to show government-issued voter ID cards [JURIST news archive] at the polls. Last month, a federal judge held [JURIST report] that the same Arizona voter ID law did not operate as an illegal poll tax. AP has more.
In Virginia v. Moore (06-1082) [docket; cert. petition], the Court will consider whether a court must suppress evidence seized after an arrest that violated state law. The Virginia Supreme Court ruled that David Lee Moore, who was arrested on a suspended license charge, should have been released and issued a summons, making the subsequent search, which turned up crack cocaine, illegal and all evidence inadmissible. Other state courts have held that subsequently seized evidence does not have to be suppressed. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iran releases fourth Iranian-American on bail
James M Yoch Jr on September 25, 2007 10:59 AM ET

[JURIST] The Iranian government ended the four-month detention of Iranian-American peace activist Ali Shakeri [advocacy website] Monday, releasing him on bail in the amount of 1 million rials (approximately USD$110,000). Shakeri, a founding member of the University of California, Irvine, Center for Citizen Peacebuilding [advocacy website], is the fourth dual US citizen Iran has detained in recent months on charges of endangering Iranian national security. According to a spokesperson for the Iranian judiciary, Shakeri may be granted judicial approval to leave Iran, where he has been detained in a Tehran prison since visiting family in May.
The four Iranian-Americans have now all been released or allowed to depart the country by Iranian authorities. Dr. Haleh Esfandiari, and Dr. Kian Tajbakhsh and Radio Farda correspondent Parnaz Azima [JURIST reports] have each been formally charged with anti-government conduct by Iran. Tajbakhsh was released [JURIST report] last week and Esfandiari was released [JURIST report] earlier this month. Azima, who was never imprisoned, has been permitted to leave the country [JURIST report] as well. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq parliament to consider private security contractor regulations
Michael Sung on September 25, 2007 8:57 AM ET

[JURIST] The Iraqi Interior Ministry is proposing draft legislation to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament that places private security contractors under Iraqi legal jurisdiction, a ministry spokesperson said Tuesday. The legislation, drafted in response to the domestic outrage at a September 16 incident in which Blackwater USA [corporate website] contractors allegedly killed 11 unarmed civilians, will overturn an exemption [PDF text] which allows US security contractors to largely operate outside of Iraqi law [JURIST report]. The exception was granted by the US government when it controlled the Coalition Provisional Authority.
On Saturday, the Iraqi Interior Ministry announced that investigators have referred the September 16 incident to an investigating judge [JURIST report], who will review the evidence and decide whether to proceed with a criminal prosecutions. A recent US bill [text, see S. 552, Clarification of Application of Uniform Code of Military Justice During a Time of War], passed last year in an effort create greater legal accountability for military contractors, does not apply to the Blackwater contractors in the incident because they were employed by the US State Department. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court rules treaty does not give individual prisoners cause of action
Brett Murphy on September 25, 2007 6:53 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled Monday that foreign prisoners do not have a cause of action under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations [PDF text] if police do not inform the inmate of their right under the treaty to call the inmate's home country embassy following arrest. Finding that the Vienna Convention is applicable only to sovereign nations, and not individuals, the court wrote [opinion, PDF]: Article 36 [of the convention] does not create judicially enforceable rights. Article 36 confers legal rights and obligations on States in order to facilitate and promote consular functions. Consular functions include protecting the interests of detained nationals, and for that purpose detainees have the right (if they want) for the consular post to be notified of their situation. In this sense, detained foreign nationals benefit from Article 36s provisions. But the right to protect nationals belongs to States party to the Convention; no private right is unambiguously conferred on individual detainees. Attorneys for the inmate plaintiffs indicated that they plan on filing an appeal with the US Supreme Court, saying that other federal jurisdictions have held that the convention does indeed provide such an enforceable right to individuals.
Last year, a Texas state court held [JURIST report] that President Bush "exceeded his constitutional authority" by mandating that US courts follow a March 2005 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision giving individuals rights under the Vienna Convention and saying that the US was obligated to grant review and reconsideration of their convictions and sentences to the ICJ. The plaintiff in the case, Jose Ernesto Medellin [ASIL case backgrounder], filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that the US had breached his right to contact the Mexican consulate for legal assistance under Article 36. The Texas case will be considered by the US Supreme Court [JURIST report] in its upcoming October 2007 Term; oral arguments are currently scheduled for October 10. The North County Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|