 |
|

Legal news from Monday, September 24, 2007 |
 |
|


Argentina war crimes suspect sentenced in US for visa fraud
Leslie Schulman on September 24, 2007 3:50 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Argentinean military officer Ernesto Guillermo Barreiro [Desaparecidos profile] has been sentenced [press release] in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to six months in jail for one count of visa fraud, US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [official website] said Monday. According to ICE, he will likely be deported to Argentina when his US sentence is complete, where he faces charges of torture, kidnapping, and murder for his role in Argentina's 1976-83 Dirty War [Global Security backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. If convicted of those charges, he faces up to life in prison.
Barreiro was arrested [JURIST report] in April for violating US immigration laws, along with two former Peruvian military officials, Telmo Ricardo Hurtado and Juan Manuel Rivera-Rondon. All three are suspected of war atrocities in their home countries, with Barreiro being accused of having served as the chief interrogator at La Perla [IPS report], a clandestine prison, where thousands of suspected dissidents and government opponents were tortured and killed. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ABA urges death penalty moratorium in Ohio
Leslie Schulman on September 24, 2007 3:07 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Bar Association death penalty assessment team [ABA materials] has recommended [news release] a moratorium on the death penalty in Ohio, in a report [PDF text; executive summary, PDF] released Monday that cited major flaws in the state's administration of capital punishment [JURIST news archive]. The assessment team, composed of Ohio lawmakers, judges, and law professors, studied the state's death penalty system for approximately 30 months before releasing the report, which only recommends a moratorium until "problems can be corrected and fairness assured." The panel identified several problems [ABA fact sheet, DOC] including inadequate and inconsistent court-appointed representation, inadequate appellate review of claims of error, racial discrepancies in sentencing, and no implementation of the US Supreme Court ruling against executing the mentally retarded [Atkins v. Virginia text]. The ABA hopes that the report will encourage Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland [official website] to impose a moratorium until the report can be reviewed and the state can implement the report's recommendations. Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association executive director John Murphy on Monday called the report a "mugging of [the Ohio] justice system."
The Ohio assessment is one of several that the ABA has conducted since 2001. An assessment panel has also identified problems with death penalty practices in Georgia and Alabama [JURIST reports]. The ABA will next review capital punishment in Pennsylvania. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judiciary concerned over salary gap
Brett Murphy on September 24, 2007 12:16 PM ET

[JURIST] US federal judges have expressed concern about the salary gap between federal judges and lawyers in the private sector, saying that judges are resigning in greater numbers than ever before due to inadequate pay, USA Today reported Monday. According to the Federal Judicial Pay Increase Fact Sheet [text] from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the pay for federal judges when adjusted for inflation has actually declined by nearly 25 percent since 1969, whereas the pay for the average US worker has increased by over 18 percent. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has proposed the Federal Judicial Salary Restoration Act of 2007 [S 1638 text, PDF], which would substantially increase the salary for a federal judge. When introducing the bill in June, Leahy said [PDF text]: This bill would demonstrate our respect and appreciation for our hardworking Federal judges by authorizing an immediate and substantial increase in judicial salaries. Our bill recognizes the important constitutional role judges play in administering justice, interpreting our laws, and providing the ultimate check and balance in our system of government. It is time Congress treated the Federal judiciary with the respect that a co-equal branch of government deserves. Opponents, however, argue that the current salary level for federal district judges, which places them in the top 10 percent earning bracket, is adequate and do not believe that the issue will cause any harm to the federal bench.
The Federal Judicial Salary Restoration Act is currently before the Senate Judiciary Committee. It would increase the salary of federal district judges from $165,200 to $247,800 per year in an attempt to close the pay gap between the federal judiciary and their colleagues in private practice. USA Today has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

'Chemical Ali' ordered executions: court testimony
Katerina Ossenova on September 24, 2007 10:53 AM ET

[JURIST] Saddam Hussein's cousin and former Iraqi defense minister Ali Hassan al-Majid [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], also known as Chemical Ali, ordered the execution of 25 villagers at a time as he crushed a Shi'a uprising [HRW backgrounder] in southern Iraq following the 1991 Persian Gulf War, according to testimony Monday in the crimes against humanity trial [JURIST report] ongoing at the Iraqi High Tribunal. A witness speaking from behind a curtain testified that his son was among those executed. The witness said that al-Majid ordered the executions of about 200 people, in batches of 25 at a time; the bodies were later found in a mass grave. Al-Majid responded that he was not even in Basra at the time. Monday's session of the trial opened with al-Majid and another defendant asking for an adjournment, saying their lawyers were afraid to attend court and had asked for protection from the US military. The request was refused.
Al-Majid and 14 other former Saddam Hussein-era officials are on trial for their role in the government's violent response to the uprising, during which tens of thousands of civilians were killed. They are charged with crimes against humanity and could face the death penalty. Al-Majid has already been sentenced to death [JURIST report] for his role in the 1988 Anfal campaign [HRW backgrounder] that slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Kurds. The Iraqi High Tribunal's Appeals Chamber upheld the death sentences [JURIST report] of three defendants in the Anfal case, including al-Majid, on September 4; Iraqi law requires the executions to take place within 30 days of the court ruling. The new case is the third in a series of trials involving Hussein-era officials [JURIST news archive]. The first was the Dujail case [BBC timeline] involving crimes against humanity committed in that Iraqi town in 1982, which resulted in the hangings of Hussein and his co-defendants. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN investigators in Darfur cite continuing human rights abuses
Katerina Ossenova on September 24, 2007 10:13 AM ET

[JURIST] A group of experts presented an interim report [press release] to the United Nations Human Rights Council [official website] on the situation in Darfur Monday, citing continued human rights violations. The report noted that the government of Sudan demonstrated cooperation [press release] during the period under review and has partially implemented some recommendations. Since other recommendations remain without implementation, the group concluded that it was "not in a position to report that a clear impact on the ground has been identified." The group expressed concern about the ongoing serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights and called on the Sudanese government to "address impunity, and to call on all parties to end violence against civilians, especially women, children, internally displaced persons, those with disabilities and humanitarian workers." A report with a detailed description and analysis of the status of the implementation of the group's recommendations in Darfur [JURIST news archive] will be presented in a final report to the Human Rights Council in December 2007. AFP has more.
The investigation by the group of experts was authorized [JURIST report] by a Human Rights Council Resolution in March 2007. In July, The UN Human Rights Committee [official website] urged [DOC text; JURIST report] the Sudanese government to "take all appropriate measures" to guarantee that all state agents, including the military and armed militias, discontinue "widespread and systematic" violations of human rights. Earlier in July, Sudan defended its handling of alleged abuses [JURIST report] in Darfur, saying its judiciary was capable of handling cases of murder, torture, and rape. Sudan has also denied allegations that the government has collaborated with armed militias, and responded to calls from the ICC chief prosecutor for the arrest of Sudanese war crime suspects by saying that the ICC does not have the jurisdiction [JURIST reports] to prosecute alleged war crimes in Darfur because Sudan has not ratified the ICC's Rome Statute [PDF text].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|