 |
|

Legal news from Monday, August 20, 2007 |
 |
|


Leahy considering contempt charges for Bush officials over wiretap subpoenas
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 20, 2007 4:43 PM ET

[JURIST] US Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) Monday threatened to hold top members of the Bush administration in contempt if they continue to refuse to turn over subpoenaed information about the warrantless domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive]. The Senate Judiciary Committee issued formal subpoenas for the surveillance documents on June 27, setting an initial compliance deadline of July 18, later extended to August 20 [letter, PDF]. White House counsel Fred Fielding told Leahy in a letter [PDF text] Monday that the White House needed more time to comply with the request, but Leahy insisted that the Committee had waited long enough. He said he would suggest contempt proceedings before the committee when the Senate reconvenes.
In a statement [text] Monday, Leahy said: Today was the deadline for the Administration to comply with the Judiciary Committee's subpoenas for documents related to the legal justifications for and President's authorization of the warrantless wiretapping program. The Administration failed to adequately comply, despite our granting an extension of more than a month past the original return date. The Administration has produced no documents, no adequate basis for noncompliance, no privilege claims, and no complete privilege log.
For more than six years, the Bush Administration intercepted communications of Americans in the United States without warrants and without following the required procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Since the President confirmed his warrantless surveillance program in December 2005, the Senate Judiciary Committee has conducted an inquiry into that program of warrantless electronic surveillance. Our focus has been on the legality of that program, not on its operational details. ...
With the temporary amendment to FISA that the Administration demanded be passed in early August set to expire in a few months, it is essential that we understand how the Bush Administration has interpreted FISA and how it has justified its activities outside that statutory framework. If we are to consider more permanent legislative changes to FISA, this is now vitally important. For Congress to legislate effectively in this area it must have full information about the Executive Branch's interpretations of FISA. We cannot and should not legislate in the dark while the Administration hides behind a veil of secrecy. The Administration's failure to comply with the Judiciary Committee's subpoenas for its legal analysis gives me little comfort. ...
The Administration's response today also claims that the Office of the Vice President is not part of the Executive Office of the President. That is wrong. Both the United States Code and even the White House's own web site say so at least it did as recently as this morning. The Committee's authorization, approved in a bipartisan 13-3 vote, clearly covered the three offices cited in the subpoena. In fact, the Committee responsibly narrowed its request to specify only these three offices that have been linked to the domestic surveillance program, rather than all of the offices within the Executive Office of the President.
The letter I received today from the White House Counsel did not identify any documents, but expressed vague hopes of negotiation and accommodation while raising the specter of more privilege claims. If the White House is serious about complying with the subpoena, then I would work out arrangements to protect national security and classified documents. It is not enough for the White House to try to look reasonable at the last minute after months of delay, it is well past time for the White House to start acting reasonably. On Friday, a spokesman for Leahy reacted coolly [press statement; JURIST report] to a White House bid to extend until after Labor Day the deadline for compliance with committee subpoenas [JURIST report; subpoena packets, PDF]. Fielding has said that many of the documents subpoenaed could be subject to executive privilege and contained "extraordinarily sensitive national security information." AP has more.
UPDATE - According to a letter [PDF text] made public by Leahy's office Tuesday, the office of the vice president has more than 40 "Top Secret/Codeword Presidential Authorizations" and memoranda from the DOJ that could answer the Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenas. Shannon Coffin, counsel to the Vice President, wrote that the office would continue to look for requested documents, but reitterated an earlier request for mroe time. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thailand election commission confirms referendum vote backing new constitution
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 20, 2007 3:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The Election Commission of Thailand [official website] on Monday certified the results [PDF text, in Thai; Nation report] of Sunday's constitutional referendum [JURIST report], reporting that 56.69 percent of voters approved the draft constitution put forth by the country's military-backed interim government. Although the measure passed, experts predict that the sizable vote against the constitution - 41.37 percent voted "no" - means that the current regime will face challenges in the upcoming December elections. Approximately 25 million people, just 57.61 percent of the electorate, participated in the vote.
The new new constitution [JURIST report; draft text, PDF] replaces Thailand's 1997 charter. Interim Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont [BBC profile], who came to power after last September's military coup [JURIST report], had urged voters to participate in the referendum, calling it a way for the people to assert their rights and help decide Thailand's future. Anti-coup activists and supporters of deposed former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra [BBC profile], however, said the new constitution decreases populist influence and transfers more power to bureaucrats and the military. Under the new constitution, Thai prime ministers will be limited to two terms in office and will be subject to easier impeachment. The Thai House of Representatives will be reduced from 500 seats to 400 seats, 320 of which will be directly elected and 80 appointed from party lists. Direct elections for members of the Senate will be abolished, with national and provisional committees composed of bureaucrats and judicial officials instead appointing the 150 senators. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Turkish parliament fails to elect president in first round of voting
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 20, 2007 1:56 PM ET

[JURIST] The Turkish parliament failed to elect a president Monday, with the leading candidate receiving only 341 votes. Current Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul [official website] was 26 votes shy of the number necessary to win the seat; the Turkish president is elected by a two-thirds majority of parliamentarians in the first round of voting. The main opposition Republican People's Party [party website, in Turkish] boycotted the vote, saying that Gul, a member of the Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (AKP) [party website, in Turkish; Wikipedia backgrounder], would try to turn Turkey into a theocratic state. A second round of voting scheduled for Friday also requires the agreement of a two-thirds majority, but a third round scheduled for next week only requires a simple majority. Gul is expected to win next week's vote. AP has more.
Gul's original candidacy in April caused controversy when he ran as the sole contender for the Turkish presidency [BBC Q&A]. The Turkish Constitutional Court voided [JURIST report] the April parliamentary vote in support of Gul because a quorum of legislators did not participate, prompting calls for constitutional reform [JURIST report]. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan [official website] accused the court of hurting democracy in its decision and said he would support dissolving parliament and holding an early parliamentary election to ensure that Turkey's leaders were chosen by the people rather than the courts. About one million protesters marched [JURIST report] in the streets of Istanbul to protest Gul and critics accused him of harboring secret plans for Islamist reforms to Turkey's strongly secular state. The Turkish army, which has ousted four presidents in four decades and regards itself as the guardian of the secular Turkish constitution [text], had also warned against instituting any Islamist reforms.
After the Constitutional Court voided the April presidential vote, members of parliament pushed through a constitutional amendment [JURIST report] to allow voters to directly elect the president. The bill was vetoed [JURIST report] by current Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer [BBC profile], and then passed by parliament a second time [JURIST report], but that vote was marred by complaints of balloting violations. The AKP then sought to hold a national referendum on the issue; Sezer later blocked the referendum [JURIST reports] from taking place at the same time as parliamentary elections [BBC Q&A] in July. The Constitutional Court has ruled that the referendum may proceed [JURIST report], but since winning re-election, the AKP has not yet scheduled a vote.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Two charges dropped in Abu Ghraib intel officer court-martial
Jeannie Shawl on August 20, 2007 12:43 PM ET

[JURIST] US military prosecutors have dropped charges of making false official statements and obstructing justice against US Army Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan [CBS profile; JURIST news archive] just hours before jury selection was set to begin in his court-martial. Jordan is the only commissioned officer charged in connection with the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal [JURIST news archive], and now faces charges [press release, DOC] of wilfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, failure to obey an order or regulation, and cruelty and maltreatment. If convicted on the remaining charges, Jordan could face over eight years in jail.
Prosecutors dropped the two charges after new evidence came to light that Jordan provided statements to an official investigating the Iraqi prison abuse allegations without being properly read his rights, making his statements inadmissible. In his 2004 report [PDF text; JURIST report], Maj. Gen. George R. Fay recommended that Jordan and Col. Thomas Pappas [official profile], Jordan's superior, be punished for their roles in the abuse scandal. Pappas was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony against Jordan. Pappas testified during Jordan's Article 32 hearing [JURIST report] that Jordan was concerned that he did not have the proper training or experience to assume his role running the Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center [backgrounder] at Abu Ghraib. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|