 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, August 1, 2007 |
 |
|


Two alleged CIA rendition victims join ACLU lawsuit against Boeing subsidiary
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 1, 2007 7:52 PM ET

[JURIST] Two men who allege that the CIA detained and tortured them in foreign prisons Wednesday joined [ACLU press release] a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] against San Jose-based Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan [corporate websites]. Iraqi citizen Bisher al-Rawi alleges that in 2002 he was detained while on a business trip in Gambia and flown to Afghanistan, where he was interrogated and tortured in a US-run prison. Yemeni citizen Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah said that he was arrested in Jordan in 2003 while visiting his mother and then flown to Afghanistan by the CIA. Bashmilah said he was interrogated and tortured for six months at Bagram Air Base [GlobalSecurity backgrounder].
In May, the ACLU filed the lawsuit [press release; JURIST report] in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Jeppesen Dataplan knowingly supported direct flights to secret CIA prisons, facilitating the torture and mistreatment of US detainees. The ACLU alleges that Jeppesen played a key role in the extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive] flights by providing a number of vital services including itinerary, route, weather, and fuel planning, as well as obtaining over-flight and landing permits from foreign governments. The ACLU was originally representing three men who were subjected to the CIA flights: Binyam Muhammad, currently being detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive], Abou Elkassim Britel, currently in a Moroccan prison, and Ahmed Agiza, currently in an Egyptian prison. Al-Rawi was held at Guantanamo Bay for nearly five years before being released [JURIST report] to the United Kingdom, where he holds residency. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Doctors say Guantanamo force-feeding violates medical ethics
Michael Sung on August 1, 2007 2:56 PM ET

[JURIST] Military doctors participating in the force-feeding of hunger-striking detainees at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] are violating medical ethics, according to commentary [text] published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) [journal website]. The three authors - Sondra S. Crosby, MD, Caroline M. Apovian, MD, Michael A. Grodin, MD - wrote that military doctors should not force treatment on detainees who have refused to voluntarily provide an informed consent, and said they were "disturbed" after conducting a review of detainee medical records and finding no evidence that the detainees had received psychiatric evaluations or been informed about the health consequences of hunger-striking or tube force-feeding. The World Medical Association (WMA) [official website] issued a revised declaration [text] last year saying: Forcible feeding is never ethically acceptable. Even if intended to benefit, feeding accompanied by threats, coercion, force or use of physical restraints is a form of inhuman and degrading treatment. Equally unacceptable is the forced feeding of some detainees in order to intimidate or coerce other hunger strikers to stop fasting. The American Medical Association [organization website] has also endorsed the WMA's position and has urged the Department of Defense (DOD) to stop the practice of force-feeding detainees [press release] who have formed an "unimpaired and rational judgment" to refuse nourishment. Last year a group of more than 250 doctors from seven countries signed an open letter [PDF text; JURIST report], urging the US government to ensure that Guantanamo detainees are examined by independent physicians and that certain aggressive force-feeding methods [JURIST report] be discontinued.
The DOD adopted a policy of force-feeding after up to 128 detainees [JURIST reports] went on hunger strike in 2005. Guantanamo Bay spokesperson Navy Commander Rick Haupt says that 20 of 23 fasting detainees are currently being force-fed and that the military does not punish doctors who refuse to participate in the procedures. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Indicted ex-Khmer Rouge leader willing to testify about Cambodia genocide
Brett Murphy on August 1, 2007 12:22 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Khmer Rouge prison chief Kaing Khek Iev [TrialWatch profile], also known as Duch, is willing to testify against other members of the Khmer Rouge, according to information released Wednesday by the tribunal that indicted [JURIST report] Duch earlier in the week. Included in Duch's detention order [PDF text] is Duch's admission that he oversaw the S-21 prison and his statement that he is willing to talk about the crimes that led to the Khmer Rouge genocide [JURIST news archive] of 1.7 million Cambodians. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website] also said Wednesday that Kar Savuth and Francois Roux had been selected by Duch to serve as his trial lawyers [press release, PDF].
Duch, one of five former Khmer Rouge leaders under investigation by the court, was arrested in 1999 on genocide charges and was subsequently charged by a military court with crimes against humanity in 2002 and war crimes [JURIST report] in March in an effort to keep Duch in custody while the ECCC started operations. Earlier this month, Nuon Chea [BBC profile], former deputy general of the Cambodian Communist Party and the most senior surviving member of the Khmer Rouge, said in an AP interview [text] that he expects to appear before the ECCC, but denied any responsibility for the genocide. The ECCC was established by a 2001 law [text as amended 2005, PDF] to investigate and try those responsible for the Cambodian genocide that occurred between 1975-1979. The genocide resulted in the deaths of approximately one-third of the Cambodian population. To date, no top Khmer Rouge officials have faced trial, and the charges against Duch are first charges brought by the tribunal. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Haneef may still face bomb plot charges: Australia police chief
Michael Sung on August 1, 2007 11:44 AM ET

[JURIST] Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty [official profile] Wednesday indicated that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) investigation of Dr. Mohammad Haneef [JURIST news archive] was "far from complete," adding that the AFP may still submit a new brief of evidence against Haneef to prosecutors. Keelty's comments followed the Tuesday release of "secret information" [press release; Solicitor-General's opinion, PDF] by Immigration and Citizenship Minister Kevin Andrews [official website], who said the AFP still considers Haneef a suspect in the attempted UK car bomb attacks [JURIST report] in June. The newly released information provided few additional insights to Andrews' much criticized decision to revoke Haneef's work visa and place him under "immigration detention" [JURIST report], but instead reiterated that Haneef left a subscriber identity module (SIM) [Wikipedia backgrounder] with his second cousin, who is one of the alleged bombers.
Haneef, who has not been implicated by UK authorities in the attacks, was detained as a terrorist suspect for 25 days for allegedly providing reckless material support [JURIST report]. Last Friday, prosecutors dropped the terror charge [JURIST report] against Haneef due to insufficient evidence. Haneef has since traveled to Bangalore, India to rejoin his wife and newborn child after the Australian government lifted Haneef's travel ban [JURIST report]. Australian Prime Minister John Howard has refused to apologize [JURIST report] to Haneef, who is currently appealing the revocation of his work visa at the Federal Court of Australia [official website]. Haneef's next hearing is scheduled for August 8. PTI has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Padilla lawyers not planning to call witnesses
Michael Sung on August 1, 2007 11:06 AM ET

[JURIST] Lawyers representing Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive] indicated Tuesday that they are not expecting to present a defense case, telling presiding US District Judge Marcia Cooke [official profile] that the defense will not call any witnesses. Jurors have been hearing the testimony from six witnesses called by lawyers representing Padilla's co-defendants, Adham Amin Hassoun and Kifah Wael Jayyousi [GlobalSecurity profiles] since federal prosecutors rested their case [JURIST report] on July 13. Defense lawyers representing the co-defendants are expected to finish presenting their case near the end of the week, and the prosecution will likely present a rebuttal early next week. The jury, which was seated [JURIST report] in May, may begin deliberations as early as late next week.
Padilla, Hassoun, and Jayyousi are accused [JURIST report] of being a part of an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist support network and conspiring to murder US nationals. Padilla, a US citizen, was arrested in 2002 at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport and subsequently detained as an "enemy combatant" [JURIST news archive] at a Navy military brig in Charleston, South Carolina. Initially accused of planning to set off a "dirty bomb" in the United States, Padilla went from enemy combatant to criminal defendant when he was finally charged with other offenses in November 2005. Padilla was transferred to civilian custody [JURIST report] in January 2006 and has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to the charges. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Japan PM dismisses US resolution calling for WWII 'comfort women' apology
Brett Murphy on August 1, 2007 10:49 AM ET

[JURIST] Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe [official website, in Japanese] said Tuesday that the recently passed US House of Representatives resolution [HR 121 materials; JURIST report] calling for a formal apology from Japan for forcing Asian women to become "comfort women" [Amnesty backgrounder; JURIST news archive] during World War II is "regrettable." Abe said that Japan has already taken steps to atone for what happened during the war, as leaders have apologized for it repeatedly since 1990, when the country recognized the occurrence of sex slavery. Japan formally apologized in the 1993 Kono Statement [text] in which the Japanese government offered its "sincere apologies and remorse" to the victims after decades of denying official involvement.
The resolution came as a reaction to Abe's March statements denying allegations of forced sexual slavery [JURIST report], saying instead that the women were professional prostitutes paid for their services. Abe's statements echoed the sentiments of Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso, who made similar remarks [JURIST report] in February. Abe later issued a guarded apology [JURIST report], although he stopped short of explicitly acknowledging the role played by the Japanese military and government in facilitating the brothels. Last month, a Japanese group consisting of 13 right-wing parliamentarians and more than 200 local politicians, nationalist intellectuals and historians called on the US House of Representatives to retract the resolution [JURIST report], claiming that the resolution is based upon "wrong information" and contradicts "historical fact." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Vietnam ex-officials on trial on bribery, gambling charges
Michael Sung on August 1, 2007 10:45 AM ET

[JURIST] Nine defendants, including three former Vietnamese government officials, accused of involvement in organized gambling and bribery went on trial Wednesday before the Hanoi People's Court. Bui Tien Dung, a former project management head in the Ministry of Transportation [official website], allegedly placed bets totaling $760,000 on European soccer matches and subsequently attempted to cover up the alleged wrongdoing by paying a bribe of $68,000. If convicted of bribery, Dung could face the death penalty. Other defendants face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for gambling, which is strictly illegal in Vietnam. The trial is expected to last three days.
Dung headed the Project Manage Unit (PMU) 18, which is responsible for the construction of roads and bridges and a is recipient of aid from the World Bank [official website] and other countries. The World Bank said in May that it found no evidence of fraud or corruption [press release] after conducting an independent review of PMU 18, although it noted shortcomings in transparency and accounting structures. The gambling-bribery scandal has resulted in the resignation [VOA report] of Transportation Minister Dao Hinh Binh and the arrest of his deputy Nguyen Viet Tien. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Somali man pleads guilty to plotting terror attacks in US
Brett Murphy on August 1, 2007 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Nuradin Abdi, a Somali national accused of planning terror attacks on shopping malls in the US, pleaded guilty [press release] to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists Tuesday. Under the plea agreement [PDF text; statement of facts, PDF] Abdi will serve 10 years in prison and pay a fine of $100,000. According to the DOJ press release, Abdi traveled abroad in 1999 and 2000 to train himself for "violent jihad," and upon returning to the US: he proposed a plot to bomb a shopping mall. Abdi was later provided with compact discs containing instructions on how to make explosives. In Dec. 2002, [Iyman] Faris described to Abdi a potential plot to launch missile attacks against various landmarks in Washington, D.C.
Shortly after these discussions, Faris was taken into custody and began making statements to the FBI. Federal agents arrested Abdi on Nov. 28, 2003. Abdi subsequently agreed to be interviewed by FBI agents and admitted conspiring with Faris, [Christopher] Paul and others to provide material support to foreign terrorists. These admissions by Abdi have been corroborated in a variety of ways, including bank records, travel records, invoices, and items seized in search warrants. Abdi was originally charged [JURIST report] with conspiring to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization (al Qaeda), fraud and misuse of documents.
Paul pleaded guilty in April to charges [JURIST reports; indictment, PDF] of conspiring to provide material support and resources to terrorists, conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction, and providing material support and resources to terrorists. Iyman Faris [Global Security profile], who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for conspiring to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge, attended the same mosque and became friends with Paul. ABC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rights group urges Mexico investigation of Oaxaca uprising response
Michael Sung on August 1, 2007 8:48 AM ET

[JURIST] Amnesty International [advocacy website] Tuesday urged the Mexican government to initiate a probe into alleged abuses [press release; report] by government authorities during the 2006 uprising in the Mexican state of Oaxaca [BBC backgrounder], saying that "ensuring that impunity for human rights violation is not allowed to prevail" will help to deter future abuses and be an opportunity for Mexican President Felipe Calderon [official website, in Spanish] to demonstrate that he is "committed to protecting, ensuring and fulfilling human rights." Oaxaca Governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz rejected the report as one-sided, saying that he believed its authors were advisers for the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca [official website], a group of leftist labor and social organizations who banded together to demand the resignation of the Oaxacan government.
In May, the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) [official website] issued a report criticizing the federal government's response [JURIST report] to the Oaxaca uprising, saying that the government's intervention was "unjustifiably delayed for more than a month and half," which allowed protesters to occupy the state capital for five months after state authorities overwhelmed. The CNDH received 1,352 separate human rights complaints and found hundreds to be credible, including complaints that police officers tortured at least 13 protesters while they were being transported to detention facilities. Last October, a UN human rights expert expressed concerns over rights violations in Oaxaca [JURIST report]. In December 2006, Mexican police arrested the Oaxaca uprising leader [JURIST report] on five charges, including kidnapping and robbery. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|