 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, July 24, 2007 |
 |
|


2000 terror suspects living in UK: Home Secretary
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 24, 2007 8:38 PM ET

[JURIST] There are approximately 2000 suspected terrorists living in Great Britain, up from last year's estimate of 1600, UK Home Secretary Jacqui Smith [official website] said Tuesday. She recommended that legislators pass new terror laws to allow police to hold uncharged terror suspects beyond the current 28 day limit. Prime Minister Gordon Brown [official website] is to set to propose harsher anti-terrorism measures before parliament on Wednesday, including a proposal to either extend the detention times for holding uncharged terrorist suspects or else do away with the time limit entirely. Brown is also expected to propose allowing wiretaps to be introduced in court cases.
In 2005, British legislators voted against an amendment to Clause 23 of the Terrorism Bill [text], which would have extended detention times to 90 days, and instead settled on the current 28 day limit. The Tony Blair government re-floated the possibility of the longer limit [JURIST report] in March 2006, and the proposal gained momentum in November after London Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair advocated an extension of the limit [JURIST report] in a major speech. Independent anti-terror law reviewer Lord Carlile has, however, warned lawmakers against "rushing" to make the change [JURIST report], and then-UK Attorney General Lord Goldsmith said during a media briefing late last year that he had not seen evidence to justify increasing the limit to 90 days [JURIST report]. Then-UK Home Secretary John Reid pushed for extending the limit [JURIST report] in February. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rights group criticizes Rwanda police for detainee killings
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 2:42 PM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] has urged Rwanda to conduct an "independent and impartial" investigation [press release] into an increasing number of alleged extrajudicial killings, saying in a report [HRW materials] Tuesday that Rwanda National Police officers have killed at least 20 prisoners in the past seven months. HRW said that most of the killings were committed against detainees accused of involvement in the 1994 Rwandan genocide [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. According to the report's summary: Although detainees were killed in official custody in earlier incidents, the number of such deaths increased significantly beginning in late 2006 following several highly publicized killings of survivors of the 1994 genocide and others involved in the gacaca jurisdictions, a popular justice initiative meant to prosecute those accused of genocide.
Faced with demands for increased protection of such vulnerable persons, officials responded by establishing a policy of collective responsibility making all Rwandans responsible for the security of their fellow citizens. The meaning of the policy was not precisely spelled out, nor was it enacted in law, but officials ordered increased night patrols by citizens. They also warned repeatedly that anyone who harmed or tried to harm survivors would face severe if unspecified punishment.
The congruence between these official pronouncements and the increase in the number of deaths in police custody raises concern that some police officers may have interpreted official exhortations as a license to abuse detainees, particularly but not exclusively those accused of crimes against survivors or persons involved in the gacaca process....
The imposition of collective punishments violates the presumption of innocence and the right of accused persons to a fair trial, rights guaranteed both by international human rights law and by the Rwandan constitution. The report concludes:The legitimacy of a judicial system is intimately connected with that of its police system.... If the Rwandan government is to demonstrate the quality of its courts and police, it must take clear and prompt action to ensure that police officers and other Rwandans respect these standards. The RNP has said it will investigate the killings, but HRW questioned the adequacy of the police investigation. Tuesday's report follows a January call from HRW for Rwandan judges and police to investigate and stop attacks on individuals administering or testifying in the local Gacaca courts [official website; Wikipedia backgrounder]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Jury selection begins in court-martial of alleged Hamdania murder ringleader
Michael Sung on July 24, 2007 2:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Jury selection began Tuesday in the court-martial [JURIST report] of US Marine Sgt. Lawrence G. Hutchins III, charged [DOC text] with murder, kidnapping, larceny, assault, housebreaking, conspiracy, and making a false official statement for his alleged role in the April 2006 kidnapping and murder of an Iraqi civilian in Hamdania [USMC timeline; JURIST news archive]. Hutchins, the leader of the squad involved in the incident, allegedly killed and left Hashim Ibrahim Awad [Wikipedia profile] by the side of the road with a shovel and firearm to appear as if he were planting an improvised explosive device. Prosecutors have indicated that they will not seek the death penalty against Hutchins.
Five other defendants have pleaded guilty [JURIST report] for their roles in the incident; they are expected to testify against Hutchins and the only other remaining defendant Cpl. Marshall Magincalda [advocacy website]. Last Friday, a military jury demoted Cpl. Trent Thomas [advocacy website] to private and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge [JURIST report] after finding him guilty of kidnapping and conspiracy [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former Vietnam officials to face trial on bribery, gambling charges
Michael Sung on July 24, 2007 1:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Three former Vietnamese government officials and six others will face organized gambling and bribery charges in court next month, a Hanoi People's Court official said Tuesday. Bui Tien Dung, a former project management head in the Ministry of Transportation [official website], allegedly placed bets totaling $760,000 on European soccer matches and subsequently attempted to cover up the alleged wrongdoing by paying a bribe of $68,000. Dung faces a maximum penalty of death for bribery, while the other defendants face up to 20 years in prison for gambling. Gambling is illegal in Vietnam.
The gambling-bribery scandal has resulted in the resignation [VOA report] of Transportation Minister Dao Dinh Binh and the arrest of his deputy Nguyen Viet Tien. In March, former Deputy Trade Minister Mai Van Dau and 13 other defendants went on trial for bribery, fraud, abuse of power, and forgery [AP report]. The defendants allegedly offered or accepted bribes to enable certain textile and garment companies to increase their share of the export quotas imposed by the United States. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

India court sentences 3 more defendants to death in 1993 Mumbai bombings
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 12:53 PM ET

[JURIST] A court in India [JURIST news archive] sentenced three men to death on Tuesday for their involvement in the 1993 Mumbai bombings [BBC backgrounder] that killed 257 people and injured more than 700 in India's financial center. The court found Zakir Hussain, Abdul Akhtar Khan and Firoz Akram Amani Malik guilty of throwing grenades at houses during the bombings. A fourth man, Moin Faridullah Qureshi, was sentenced to life imprisonment instead of the death penalty because he was a minor at the time of the bombings.
Thus far the court has sentenced [JURIST report] 10 people to death and 17 to life imprisonment for involvement in the bombings. The trial, which began in 1995, included testimony from 757 witnesses and has resulted in the conviction of over 100 defendants [JURIST report], a figure that public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam described as unprecedented. Thirty-five suspects, including the alleged mastermind of the bombings, Dawood Ibrahim [BBC profile], remain at large. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Formal corruption charges laid against former Bangladesh PM
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 10:37 AM ET

[JURIST] Former Bangladeshi Prime Minster Sheikh Hasina [party profile] was formally charged Tuesday with extortion for alleged kickbacks she received during her tenure in office. According to the charges, the former PM and two relatives received thousands of dollars from deals, including one awarding a contract to an electric company. Hasina was arrested last week, and has at least two other extortion cases pending against her. Hasina maintains that the arrest was politically motivated to keep her from becoming involved in future elections.
In June, Hasina, the leader of the opposition Awami League [party website], criticized the arrest [JURIST report] of Awami secretary general Abdul Jalil as an "autocratic move" motivated by politics rather than any legitimate attempt to stamp out corruption. The Bangladeshi interim emergency government [JURIST report], which came to power in January with the backing of the military, has used its anti-corruption campaign [BBC Q&A; JURIST news archive] to justify the declaration of a state of emergency [JURIST report] allowing detention without warrants or specific charges. The emergency government has also filed corruption charges against Hasina's rival, former Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia [UN profile] and last Thursday jailed a UN human rights expert who had been prevented from traveling to Geneva to deliver a report on human trafficking. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China compensates food and drug corruption whistleblower
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 10:20 AM ET

[JURIST] The Chinese government compensated Zhang Zhijian, who exposed the corruption of former drug safety commissioner Zheng Xiaoyu, in the amount of 24,000 yuan ($3,175 USD) after he spent 10 months in jail for posting an Internet story on the corruption, AP reported Tuesday. Zhang was originally sentenced [JURIST report] to six years imprisonment in March for defaming the government. He was released from prison in April.
Zheng was executed [JURIST report] earlier this month, after the Supreme People's Court [official website] denied his appeal for leniency. In May, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court convicted Zheng and sentenced him to death [JURIST report]. Zheng, who served as the food and drug commissioner from 1998 to 2005, allowed eight pharmaceutical companies to bypass the drug approval process, including one company whose antibiotic is suspected of killing at least 10 people. Last Friday, Zheng's former subordinate, former Pharmaceutical Registration Department Director Cao Wenzhuan, was also sentenced to death [JURIST report] for receiving approximately $316,000 in bribes in exchange for certifying substandard drugs from two pharmaceutical companies. Death sentences in China require the approval [JURIST report] of the Supreme People's Court. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judges establish panel to supervise California prisons
Michael Sung on July 24, 2007 9:59 AM ET

[JURIST] Two federal district judges separately ordered Monday the formation of special three-judge panel to supervise and reduce California's prison population after finding that California's prison overcrowding [JURIST news archive] is preventing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) [official website] from adequately providing mental health care. Judge Thelton E. Henderson of the Northern District of California ordered [PDF text] the suspension of the CDCR Secretary's authority and transferred all "administration, control, management, operation, and financing" authority to the panel. Judge Lawrence K. Karlton of the Eastern District of California said that the receivership, which the CDCR is required to comply with within 30 days [order, PDF], is to oversee "the development of remedies for the systematic constitutional violation and to monitor implementation of court-approved remedies." The orders will have to require final approval from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which will likely approve Karlton's recommendation to combine the two orders under one receiver.
In May, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger [official website] signed off on a $7.7 billion program to construct facilities [JURIST report] to provide 53,000 new prison and jail beds over the next five years. The construction program and other measures, including a plan to release prisoners convicted of nonviolent crimes [JURIST report] in response to threats of federal oversight [JURIST report], failed to persuade the federal judges, who were not convinced that the measures would bring compliance with the Eight Amendment guarantee of constitutionally adequate mental health care for individuals suffering from serious mental illnesses that are incarcerated by the CDCR. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australia lawyers group says Hicks military commission trial 'a charade'
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 9:21 AM ET

[JURIST] The Law Council of Australia, the country's national organization for lawyers, on Tuesday issued harsh criticism [press release] of the trial of former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks [Law Council backgrounder; JURIST news archive], saying the trial was "a charade." The council's report [PDF text; summary, PDF], prepared by lawyer Lex Lasry, criticized the American and Australian governments on the trial, concluding that: The "trial" of David Hicks, which took place in March 2007, was a charade.
A pre-trial agreement had been signed and the balance of the legal proceedings was entirely surplus to requirements, although designed to lay a veneer of due process over a political and pragmatic bargain. The veneer cracked immediately.
Ultimately, there has been no benefit from this process; only a corrosion of the rule of law.
No ground can be claimed to have been made in the so-called War on Terror. The Military Commission process at Guantanamo likewise has neither gained from it, nor shown any prospect of improvement.
Predictably, there has been no response from the Australian Government to the consistent and widespread criticism of the Military Commissions and Guantanamo Bay generally. Their support for this process has been shameful.
They have never put an argument to the Australian public as to why the Military Commission process is "full and fair". Now that the Hicks case is over, no doubt the hope is that the issue will disappear and, regrettably, perhaps it will.
However, Australia's international standing and moral authority has been diminished by its support of a process so obviously at odds with the rule of law. Those with a concern for the protection of due process should be very concerned about the future of this process, particularly given its jurisdiction to impose death penalties. Hicks was transferred to Australia [JURIST report] in May to serve the remainder of his nine-month prison sentence at a maximum security prison near his hometown of Adelaide, South Australia. Hicks spent more than five years in US custody after being captured in Afghanistan and pleaded guilty to a charge of supporting terrorism [JURIST reports] in March. Under the plea agreement [text], Hicks was required to state that he "has never been illegally treated" while held as an enemy combatant by the United States and that his detention was lawful pursuant the laws of armed conflict. He also agreed not to take any legal action against the United States for his treatment during his five-year detention. The plea agreement includes provisions limiting Hicks' contact with the media. The Australian attorney general has said the gag order cannot be enforced, but Hicks' lawyer has said that Hicks will not violate the order [JURIST reports] because he is not interested in speaking to the media. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Veterans groups sue VA for post-traumatic stress treatment failures
Michael Sung on July 24, 2007 9:14 AM ET

[JURIST] Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth [advocacy website] filed a class action lawsuit Monday against the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [official website] on behalf of approximately 320,000 to 800,000 veterans of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [backgrounder], alleging that the VA is denying adequate procedural safeguards [complaint, PDF; factsheet, DOC] in the VA benefits process. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, also accuses the VA of denying mandated medical care and VA benefits to veterans afflicted with PTSD. The complaint alleges: The system for deciding VA claims has largely collapsed. The VA claims adjudication system is currently mired in processing a backlog of over 600,000 claims, many of which have been pending for years. The time period for a claim to be fully decided can exceed ten years. By comparison, the private sector health care industry processes thirty-billion claims annually in an average of 89.5 days per claim, including the time required to resolve disputed claims. The VA's process for pursuing a claim is not merely arbitrary and ineffective. The delays have become an insurmountable barrier preventing many veterans from obtaining health care and benefits. Many wounded veterans, particularly those with combat-caused mental illnesses, give up in frustration and despair or die while their claims are pending. In these cases, just delayed is justice denied. The groups also allege that higher-level VA officials have exerted pressure on local officials to deny claims, intentionally underestimate the severity of veterans' disabilities to save money, or even misdiagnose PTSD as non-combat-related personality disorders to avoid paying benefits.
The plaintiffs, who are not seeking damages from the VA, are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the 1973 Rehabilitation Act [text]. AP has more. IPS has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Connecticut city becomes first in US to issue IDs for undocumented immigrants
Brett Murphy on July 24, 2007 9:05 AM ET

[JURIST] A controversial law offering ID cards to illegal immigrants went into effect Tuesday in New Haven, Connecticut. The municipal identification cards, which will be available at a cost of $10 for adults and $5 for children and will not distinguish citizens from undocumented immigrants, will allow cardholders to access public libraries, parks and recreational sites, and other municipal services as well as act as debit cards and pay for parking meters. Supporters of the law, including New Haven Mayor John DeStefano Jr. [official profile], believe it will help encourage immigrants to cooperate with police and "build a stronger community," but opponents worry it will bring more illegal immigrants to the area.
The city Board of Alderman approved [JURIST report] the law last month, in contrast with immigration [JURIST news archive] ordinances adopted in other local communities, such as the ordinance [DOC text; JURIST report] in Farmers Branch, Texas which would bar landlords from renting apartments to most undocumented immigrants. The ordinance has been blocked [JURIST report] by a US federal judge as legal challenges [JURIST report] are underway. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|