 |
|

Legal news from Friday, June 22, 2007 |
 |
|


Guantanamo tribunal officer says CSRTs pressured on 'enemy combatant' rulings
Mike Rosen-Molina on June 22, 2007 7:21 PM ET

[JURIST] The Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT) [DOD materials] at Guantanamo Bay were pressured to declare detainees "enemy combatants" based on vague or incomplete evidence, according to a Friday affidavit [PDF text] filed with a DC appeals court by a US army officer involved in the tribunals. The statement by Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, who said he worked as a liaison between the CSRT and intelligence agencies, is the first such public criticism by a member of a CSRT. Abraham filed the affidavit on behalf of Fawzi al-Odah [Amnesty International profile], a Kuwaiti detainee who is contesting his status as an "enemy combatant," after being approached by al-Odah's lawyer David Cynamon [firm profile]. Abraham also said that intelligence agencies often arbitrarily withheld information from both defense and prosecution. The Department of Defense had no immediate reaction, but a spokesman said officials were preparing a response. AP has more.
In May, the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] heard arguments in a case brought by Guantanamo Bay detainees challenging their designation as 'enemy combatants.' Last year, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [PDF text], which barred Guantanamo prisoners from challenging their indefinite detention but did allow them to appeal their "enemy combatants" [JURIST news archive] status to the appeals court. In April, the US Supreme Court declined [JURIST report] to hear a lawsuit brought by two Guantanamo Bay detainees challenging the legality of Congress' decision to deny habeas challenges by suspected terrorists under the Military Commissions Act. The same month, the Court declined to hear [JURIST report] another case brought by other Guantanamo detainees on whether those prisoners could challenge their detention in US federal court.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China labor officials arrested for links to slave labor
Gabriel Haboubi on June 22, 2007 2:18 PM ET

[JURIST] Two Chinese labor officials were arrested Friday after allegations broke that they failed to report the enslavement of hundreds of people, which included not only adults, but also children and the mentally retarded. A total of 359 people, with at least 12 children, were forced to work up to 20 hours a day without pay at various Chinese brick kilns in the Shanxi and Henan provinces in central China [JURIST news archive]. Hou Junyuan, the head of the local labor inspection team, was arrested for dereliction of duty, while one of his officers was arrested on charges of abuse of power. China's official Xinhua News Agency [media website] said that the two forced a child laborer, who had been released from one kiln and was on his way back home, to go to a new kiln where he was forced into slave labor again [Xinhua report].
More charges may be brought against other government officials. Xinhua said one father who went looking for his son was told by a local police officer that he could take his own son home if he found him, but "otherwise, keep your nose out of this" [Xinhua report]. Chinese officials have detained 59 people, placing 35 in criminal detention. Investigators are currently searching for 20 others believed to have been involved. A State Council conference chaired by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao [BBC profile] said earlier this week that those who have illegally employed children or subjected workers to slave conditions will be severely punished. CBC earlier reported that one of the kiln foremen, who was caught after police offered a reward, expressed sorrow for the slaves, but said that he felt he did nothing wrong in enslaving them [CBC report]. Last week China was criticized by the US State Department for "not making a significant effort to combat human trafficking" [JURIST report]. CBC has more. The People's Daily has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

McNulty denies key role in US Attorney firings, disputes Goodling testimony
Michael Sung on June 22, 2007 1:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Outgoing US Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty [official profile] Thursday denied [transcript] playing a key role in the controversial firings of at least eight US Attorneys [JURIST news archive] in testimony before the House Judiciary Committee [official website]. McNulty disputed the testimony [JURIST report] of former US Department of Justice (DOJ) aide Monica Goodling [JURIST news archive] who said that McNulty was closely involved and frequently updated on the list of US Attorneys to be fired. McNulty testified that he "had no knowledge of any plan to remove US Attorneys prior to October of 2006," adding that he was consulted near the end of the process only after the list was compiled by former DOJ Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson [DOJ press release; JURIST news archive] sometime in October or November. McNulty indicated that he removed US Attorney for the Northern District of Florida Gregory R. Miller [official profile] from the firing list, and added Kevin V. Ryan [Wikipedia profile], one of nine US Attorneys fired, but the only one that received consistently negative performance evaluations.
In May, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile; JURIST news archive] told reporters that he relied upon McNulty's recommendations [JURIST report], saying that McNulty knew better than anyone else about the qualifications of the US Attorneys. Last Friday, Mike Elston, chief of staff to McNulty, announced his resignation [JURIST report] effective June 22. Elston is accused of making threatening phone calls to at least four of the dismissed US Attorneys, urging them to remain silent about the circumstances of their firings. McNulty announced his resignation [JURIST report] last month, effective as early as the end of the summer or when a successor receives Congressional approval. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ asks federal court to block state probes of NSA domestic spying
Michael Sung on June 22, 2007 11:46 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] asked a federal district judge Thursday to block New Jersey, Vermont, Maine, Missouri, and Connecticut from investigating potential violations of state consumer privacy laws in the controversial warrantless domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive], arguing that the state secrets privilege doctrine bars the state governments from subpoenaing ten telecommunication companies to determine what information they passed onto the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website]. DOJ lawyers told Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the US District Court of Northern California [official website] that the disclosure would harm national security and interfere with foreign affairs. New Jersey First Assistant Attorney General Anne Milgram countered [brief, PDF; press release] on behalf of all five states that "neither the state secrets privilege nor any federal statute or Executive Order" allows the federal government to prevent state officials from conducting an investigation, adding that the state secrets privilege may only protect information from disclosure.
Walker is also currently presiding over a class action lawsuit [EFF case backgrounder; JURIST report] challenging the legality of the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [advocacy website] brought the class action against AT&T [corporate website] in January 2006, alleging that the company had unlawfully provided the NSA with access to its facilities and resources to unconstitutionally spy on "millions of ordinary Americans." In July 2006, the DOJ motioned to dismiss the case citing the state secrets privilege, which Walker denied [JURIST report] on the grounds that the broad media coverage of the surveillance program had neutralized any danger of disclosing state secrets. The DOJ has appealed the ruling [JURIST report] to the Ninth Circuit, which will hear the arguments in August. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Cheney ignoring executive order on classified info oversight: House panel
Michael Sung on June 22, 2007 10:21 AM ET

[JURIST] US Vice President Dick Cheney has exempted his office [press release] from Executive Order 12958 [PDF text] as amended by Executive Order 13292 [text], which requires executive branch officials to submit annual reports to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) [official website] to ensure that classified information is properly secured, according to documents released Thursday by the House Oversight Committee. The committee said that the ISOO issued letters of protest in June and August 2006 [PDF texts], and upon being ignored by Cheney's office, submitted a letter [PDF text] to the Department of Justice (DOJ) in January 2007. According to the ISOO, Cheney's office responded to the ISOO's request for access by asking President Bush to amend the executive orders to close the ISOO. Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman chastised [letter, PDF] Cheney's office for blocking efforts by the ISOO to conduct oversight by asserting that the office was not an "entity within the executive branch." Waxman further criticized the "legality and wisdom" of Cheney's actions, citing repeated security breaches in Cheney's office. In October 2005, the DOJ indicted [PDF text] Leandro Aragoncillo, an official in Cheney's office, for passing classified information to individuals in the Philippines. Aragoncillo pleaded guilty in May 2006. Waxman also cited the leak of former CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity [JURIST news archive] as an instance where Cheney's office failed to adhere to security protocols.
Cheney is accused of consistently shielding the internal workings [Oversight Committee fact sheet, PDF] of his office from external oversight. In 2005, Cheney successfully blocked [JURIST report] efforts by watchdog groups to obtain internal communications of the National Energy Policy Development Group [policy report, PDF], a task force headed by Cheney that consulted with private industry officials. Cheney has also sought to block efforts [JURIST report] by the Washington Post and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to obtain Secret Service visitor logs [JURIST report] to identify lobbyists and religious leaders who have visited Cheney's residence. In May, the DOJ revealed that Cheney's lawyers instructed the Secret Service to destroy the visitor logs [JURIST report], despite claims that the information was protected by the Presidential Records Act [text]. The DOJ is currently reviewing the decision of the vice president's office to not comply with the executive orders. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

White House mulling closure of Guantanamo detention facilities: AP
Michael Sung on June 22, 2007 8:36 AM ET

[JURIST] The White House is considering the closure of detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] and the transfer of the estimated 385 detainees currently held there to other military detention facilities, AP reported Thursday. Three senior Bush administration officials told AP they believe a consensus has been building within the executive branch, saying that the proposal has "at least tacit support" from the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, and the intelligence community. Vice President Dick Cheney and the Department of Justice are believed to be the major opposition to the proposed closure, fearing that the transfer of detainees [JURIST news archive] to other jurisdictions could give them more significant legal rights. The officials said that a meeting on the issue was scheduled for Friday, although National Security Council spokesperson Gordan Johndroe later said that the meeting has been moved to a later date [NBC report].
The detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay were established in 2002 as part of a deliberate effort to detain "enemy combatants" [JURIST news archive] outside of the US or another state's legal jurisdiction. The Guantanamo Bay Naval Base [official website] is under an indefinite lease with Cuba and is not subject to any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] that customarily define the legal status of individual and property within US military bases hosted on foreign territories. Cuba and the US also do not maintain formal diplomatic relations. Many foreign governments, including the UK [JURIST report], and prominent current and former US officials have urged the closure of Guantanamo. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell recently criticized the facilities [JURIST report], saying that Guantanamo is a stain on United States' creditability and reputation as a global leader. The US House of Representatives passed an amendment to a defense spending bill last month which would require the Pentagon to develop a Guantanamo shutdown plan [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China tries former drug safety official for corruption
Michael Sung on June 22, 2007 7:58 AM ET

[JURIST] The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court began judicial proceedings against former Pharmaceutical Registration Department director Cao Wenzhuan Thursday as a part of China's crackdown on corruption at the State Food and Drug Administration [official website, in Chinese], where high-ranking officials allegedly received bribes in exchange for the certification of substandard drugs. Cao alleged received $307,000 in bribes from two pharmaceutical companies, and has also been charged with neglecting his duty to properly certify medication.
In May, former Commissioner of the State Food and Drug Administration Zheng Xiaoyu, was sentenced to death for receiving $832,000 in bribes [JURIST report] and allowing eight companies to bypass the drug approval process. One improperly approved antibiotic is suspected of killing at least 10 people. Zheng, who served as the food and drug commissioner from 1998 to 2005, has appealed his death sentence on the grounds that it is too harsh because he cooperated with the investigation and has confessed his crimes. Death sentences in China require the approval [JURIST report] of the Supreme People's Court [official website]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|