 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, June 14, 2007 |
 |
|


DOJ civil rights focus shifting from race to religion: NYT
Gabriel Haboubi on June 14, 2007 4:10 PM ET

[JURIST] US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] civil rights investigations in the Bush administration have focused on issues of religious freedom and discrimination at the expense of race, the New York Times reported Thursday. As an extreme instance, the Times pointed to DOJ intervention in a case helping a religious group secure the right to "distribute candy canes as part of a religious message that the red stripes represented the blood of Christ." The DOJ Civil Rights Division [official website] has also been active in enforcing a 2000 law that allows houses of worship to be exempt from local zoning restrictions, bringing lawsuits on behalf of churches, synagogues, and mosques across the country. Since 2004, the department has maintained a semi-monthly newsletter [archive] focusing exclusively on religious freedom.
The Times also highlighted unprecedented DOJ hirings [NYT chart] of graduated law students from a new wave of religious-affiliated law schools such as Regent University and Ave Maria [academic websites]. It quoted former DOJ lawyer Rigel Oliveri, who worked in the department during the Clinton and early Bush years, as saying that with increasing political appointee oversight of hiring decisions, "the change in the quality of people who were chosen was very pronounced," compared to previous years when hires from Harvard, Yale and other prestigious top-tier law schools dominated the department. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Germany chancellor doubtful of EU constitution progress at summit
Gabriel Haboubi on June 14, 2007 2:07 PM ET

[JURIST] German Chancellor Angela Merkel [official website] Thursday told the lower house of Germany's parliament [official website, in German] that she hopes a road map to an eventual European constitution [JURIST news archive] can be achieved at an EU summit in Brussels next week, but expressed doubts [speech text, in German; press release, in German] that any further progress would be made beyond that. Merkel recognized a number of stumbling blocks that have arisen, including calls from France and Spain [JURIST report] for a "mini-treaty" to replace the originally proposed Constitution for Europe [text]. Germany had wished to place the EU back on track towards ratifying the treaty while holding presidency of the EU [official website], but it relinquishes the role to Portugal at the end of the month.
Another key stumbling block involves the voting system proposed in the 2004 draft constitution. Poland has rejected the "double majority voting system", which is supported by 25 member states, because that system diminishes Poland voting power compared to the 2000 Treaty of Nice [text]. Despite Poland's concerns, Reuters has reported that a German report on EU constitution reforms makes no mention [Reuters report] of the voting system. On Wednesday, Poland's Prime Minister indicated that unless negotiations on the voting system were left open, they would not agree [JURIST report] to any proposed treaty. AFP has more. Bloomberg has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Zimbabwe House approves controversial electronic surveillance bill
Michael Sung on June 14, 2007 1:48 PM ET

[JURIST] The Zimbabwean House of Assembly, the lower chamber of parliament, approved the controversial Interception of Communications Bill [PDF text] Wednesday, authorizing the the directors of Zimbabwe's Central Intelligence Organization [Wikipedia backgrounder], the military, taxation authority, and the Commissioner of Police to intercept communications across the telephone, the internet, and other electronic communication devices. The bill, which will also allow the government to open conventional mail, requires communication service providers to facilitate the interception and storage of communications at the government's request. Opposition lawmakers from the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) [party website] criticized the bill, which is expected to receive the approval of the Senate, as an ongoing effort by President Robert Mugabe [BBC profile] to consolidate power and crack down on dissent in Zimbabwe [JURIST news archive].
On Monday, a rights group accused [press release, PDF; JURIST report] the Zimbabwean government of "interfering with the proper functioning of the administration of justice, the role of lawyers and their independence." Police in Zimbabwe have long been accused of ignoring the rule of law. In May, Zimbabwean police refused to comply with a High Court ruling [JURIST report] requiring police officials to vacate a farm seized by police in March, and responded by ordering more police on to the property. In March, opposition leader and presidential hopeful Morgan Tsvangirai [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] was arrested and beaten [JURIST reports] while in police custody. Police officials have routinely ignored court orders and critics have alleged that Mugabe has given tacit approval to their actions. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules in union fees dispute
Michael Sung on June 14, 2007 10:07 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Thursday, including the consolidated cases of Davenport v. Washington Education Association and Washington v. Washington Education Association [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court held that states do not violate the First Amendment by barring a labor union from utilizing non-union worker's dues for political purposes if the workers have not given their affirmative authorization. A Washington state trial court ruled that a union had to ask permission of workers to use their dues for political activity under a Washington state law, a state appeals court reversed - saying the statute placed an undue burden on the union's right to free speech - and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed [opinion text]. Read the Supreme Court's opinion [text] per Justice Scalia, along with a concurrence [text] from Justice Breyer.
In Permanent Mission v. New York, NY [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], the Court held 7-2 that foreign governments may be sued for payment of local property taxes on real estate used for diplomatic residences. The Court, noting that "property ownership is not an inherently sovereign function," affirmed the Second Circuit's decision [PDF text] and held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act [text] "does not immunize foreign governments from lawsuits to declare the validity of tax liens on property held by the government" for diplomatic residences. Under New York law, real property owned by foreign governments is exempt from taxation if used exclusively for diplomatic offices or quarters for ambassadors or ministers invested with the full power and authority of ambassadors. India and Mongolia, which house their diplomats in the same high-rise buildings in which their missions are located, owe $16.4 million and $2.1 million respectively in tax liens, according to the city. Read the Court's opinion [text] per Justice Thomas, along with a dissent [text] from Justice Stevens.
Finally, in Bowles v. Russell [Duke Law case backgrounder], the Court held that a federal appeals court cannot consider an appeal if the time limit for filing had expired, even when the appeal was filed late in reliance on a district court order. The Court affirmed the Sixth Circuit's decision [PDF text] and held that time limits are a jurisdictional requirement and that the Supreme Court "lacks the authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements." Bowles, who was convicted of murder, had failed to file a timely notice of appeal pursuant to the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) [PDF text], which allows a district court to grant a 14-day extension under certain conditions, because a district judge had erroneously given him a 17-day deadline. Read the Court's 5-4 opinion [text] per Justice Thomas, along with a dissent [text] from Justice Souter.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ACLU files lawsuit for immigration detainees seeking medical care
Michael Sung on June 14, 2007 9:02 AM ET

[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] Wednesday filed a class action lawsuit [petition, PDF; press release] against federal immigration officials from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the San Diego Correctional Facility (SDCF), and the Division of Immigration Health Services (DIHS) [official websites], seeking injunctive and declaratory relief on behalf of immigration detainees who allege that inadequate medical and mental health care at the SDCF have caused "unnecessary suffering [and] avoidable death." The complaint names eleven detainees who have either faced month-long delays or have been outright denied treatment for medical conditions that have resulted in permanent disfigurement. The ACLU alleges that the "incompetence and indifference" of immigration authorities in facilitating necessary medical care violates the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against "unnecessary pain and suffering." ACLU National Prison Project [advocacy website] staff attorney Tom Jawetz described the level of care as "horrific, and in stark contrast to American values."
The ACLU says the DIHS's "Covered Services Package" unduly delays treatment as medical staff must obtain affirmative approval from off-site DIHS officials in the form of "medically necessary referrals before treating detainees." The policy, the ACLU says, is rooted in a often-false assumption that immigration detainees are held for relatively short periods of time, while in actual practice, "many detainees spend months or years" waiting for a resolution of their case. The SDCF is operated by the Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. (CCA) [corporate website], the largest private, for-profit provider of detention and corrections services in the United States. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US human trafficking report cites Islamic states for inaction
Michael Sung on June 14, 2007 7:58 AM ET

[JURIST] The US State Department [official website] Tuesday cited the governments of 16 countries, including 11 predominantly Islamic states, for not making a "significant effort to combat human trafficking" in its annual report [PDF text] on modern-day slavery around the world Tuesday. Although Algeria, Bahrain, Burma, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Kuwait, Malaysia, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela were classified as the worst "Tier 3" countries, State Department spokesman Mark P. Lagon nonetheless insisted [statement] human trafficking "plagues every country in one way or another." The report, mandated by the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (VTPA) [PDF text], analyzed 164 countries and territories, and ranked 151 of the entities where there have been 100 cases of human trafficking into four categories.
The report classified 32 countries or territories on the "Tier 2 Watch List," a classification for countries that were found to "not fully comply with the VTPA's minimum standards but are making significant efforts to bring themselves in compliance" but continue to face a very significant or growing human trafficking problem, including Argentina, China, Egypt, India, Libya, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, and others.
Releasing the report, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice [official profile] praised [statement] the efforts of governments in Israel, Taiwan, Indonesia, Brazil, Peru, and Jamaica, which improved from the "Tier 2 Watch List" to "Tier 2," a designation for countries, which includes 75 governments like Greece, Japan, Pakistan, Portugal, Singapore, and Zimbabwe, "whose governments do not fully comply with minimum standards but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance." Logan in particular contrasted China's worse ranking with Taiwan, attributing China's resistance in joining the international community "in upholding universal anti-trafficking standards" to a lack of rule of law. Logan says "Taiwan's vibrant civil society and democratic character" has aided its reforms. A total of 28 countries were designated Tier 1, whose governments have been found to fully comply with TVPA standards, including Georgia, Hungary, and Slovenia, which have entered into compliance since the publication of the 2006 report on human trafficking [JURIST]. VOA has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|