Bush administration was divided on legality of warrantless wiretaps: Ashcroft

[JURIST] Former US Attorney General John Ashcroft [official profile] said Thursday at a closed-door hearing held by the US House Intelligence Committee [official website] that there had been divisions between members of the Bush administration as to whether the president's warrantless wiretapping program [JURIST news archive] was legal. The House Intelligence Committee and its Senate counterpart are reviewing the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act [text], and its relation to the domestic eavesdropping program. AP has more.

Also on Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] voted 13-3 to authorize Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official website] to issue subpoenas for documents relating to the legal basis [press release] of the wiretapping program. Leahy cited a lack of cooperation by the Bush administration in seeking the subpoena power. Both Leahy and Republican ranking member Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website] repeatedly sought the release of the documentation [JURIST report], but to no avail. Controversy over the program grew drastically [JURIST report] after it was discovered that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile], then White House counsel, attempted to persuade Ashcroft to reauthorize the warrantless wiretapping program while Ashcroft was incapacitated in the hospital, critically ill with pancreatitis [JURIST report]. NPR has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.