 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, April 10, 2007 |
 |
|


Texas juvenile prison workers charged with sexual abuse
Caitlin Price on April 10, 2007 8:13 PM ET

[JURIST] Two former administrators at a Texas juvenile prison were arrested Tuesday [press release] on 13 charges of improper sexual conduct with six students. Former West Texas State School [official website] principal John Paul Hernandez and former assistant superintendent Ray E. Brookins each resigned in 2005 as an investigation by Texas Rangers; the case has only recently moved forward as Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott [official profile] has taken over the case from a local prosecutor who declined to pursue most cases relating to the school from 2005-2006. The investigating Rangers alleged that they presented their findings [WorldnetDaily report] to the state and US Attorney offices as well as the Department of Justice, but that no office showed interest in prosecution. Hernandez was charged with nine counts of improper sexual activity with a person in custody and nine counts of improper relationship with a student. Brookins faces up to 20 years in prison for charges of an improper relationship with a student and two years in prison for improper sexual activity with a person in custody. AP has more.
A 2006 US Department of Justice report [text, PDF; summary] said that sexual violence in US prisons, perpetrated by both inmates and prison staff, often goes unreported because abused inmates fear a reprisal. Last month, Texas Gov. Rick Perry [official profile] appointed a commission to review the records of approximately 90 percent of the state's juvenile inmates [JURIST report] following allegations by families and community activists that prison officials extended sentences in retaliation for inmates filing grievances. Staff-initiated sexual misconduct constituted 38 percent of allegations. The authors of the report also warned against placing juvenile inmates with the adult prison population, finding that the incidents of rape and abuse are five times higher against juveniles. The report, which was the second in an annual series [JURIST report] required by the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 [text, PDF; DOJ backgrounder], showed a marked improvement over staff sexual misconduct and harassment since the initial 2004 study.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ethiopia admits to detaining terror suspects but denies secrecy
Caitlin Price on April 10, 2007 7:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The government of Ethiopia [JURIST news archive] admitted in a statement [text] from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) [official website] Tuesday that it had detained 41 terror suspects and granted foreign investigators access to the detainees for questioning. The admission came after Sweden, Canada, and Eritrea urged [JURIST report] the country to reveal details regarding foreign nationals allegedly detained in secret prisons [JURIST report]. The MFA acknowledged that the suspects came from 17 countries; military courts have ordered the release of 29 of the detainees, and five have already been released. In response to allegations of human rights violations, the Foreign Ministry said The suspected terrorists have been subject to a process of investigation [...] Those found to have engaged in terrorism will be held accountable for their deeds in accordance with legal processes. All this has been done meticulously and scrupulously in conformity with principles of humanitarian law. Any claim to the contrary is pure fabrication and could be easily proven as such. The statement did not name which countries had a hand in the interrogations, but did confirm that Ethiopian personnel were present during all questionings, and denied charges that the government had acted in secrecy.
Last week Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] reports claimed [JURIST report] that the US, Kenya, and Ethiopia were cooperating with the transitional government of Somalia to detain refugees from the recent conflict there, leading to disclosure of the existence of prisons in which US government agencies have interrogated individuals suspected of having ties to al Qaeda. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Europol releases terrorism status report
Alexis Unkovic on April 10, 2007 7:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Europol [official website], the EU law enforcement organization that handles criminal intelligence, presented its EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report TE-SAT 2007 [text, PDF; press release] to the European Parliament Tuesday, providing an overview of terrorism in the 27-member European Union [official website, JURIST news archive]. According to the report, 706 individuals were arrested in 15 member states on suspicion of terrorism offenses in 2006, while 498 terrorist attacks were reportedly carried in 11 member states. Separatists and nationalists in the Basque region of Spain and on the French island of Corsica were responsible for most of the attacks. EU officials say they would like to extend Europol's authority in the future to investigate other criminal issues. AP has more.
In 2006, the European Commission [official website] urged EU member states [JURIST report] to implement compatible criminal law procedures in the wake of a study conducted by the University of Maastricht showing how drastically different legal policies among the member states allowed some crimes to slip through the cracks. In particular, the 2006 study noted differences regarding how national police and courts in different EU states deal with terrorist suspects and criminal charges.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ninth Circuit holds Bush salmon plan violates Endangered Species Act
Joe Shaulis on April 10, 2007 5:43 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] has ruled [opinion, PDF] that a Bush administration plan to protect salmon and steelhead near hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin [USGS backgrounder] violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) [text; EPA summary]. Monday's unanimous decision by a three-judge panel affirmed decisions by an Oregon district court in 2005 [JURIST report] and 2006 [opinion, PDF]. The Ninth Circuit held that the 2004 plan, called a biological opinion [US Interior Dep't materials], "contained structural flaws that rendered it incompatible with the ESA." On behalf of the panel, Circuit Judge Sydney R. Thomas wrote that under the administration's approach, a listed species could be gradually destroyed, so long as each step on the path to destruction is sufficiently modest. This type of slow slide into oblivion is one of the very ills the ESA seeks to prevent. The court also upheld the district court's order that NOAA Fisheries [official website] and other federal agencies collaborate with the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington, as well as several Native American tribes, to devise a new plan.
Responding to the decision, federal officials said [press release] they hope "collaboration will increase the likelihood that the final biological opinion will not only protect salmon but will have broad regional support as well." Steve Mashuda, an Earthjustice attorney representing the plaintiff groups praised the decision [press release], calling it "a strong message to the Administration that it cannot ignore the requirements of the ESA." AP has more. From Portland, the Oregonian has local coverage.
This report was prepared in partnership with the Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ukraine court delays hearing on presidential decree dissolving parliament
Lisl Brunner on April 10, 2007 4:13 PM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Ukraine [official website] Tuesday delayed a scheduled hearing on the legality of an April 2 decree [transcript of televised statement; decree text] by President Viktor Yushchenko [official website; BBC profile] dissolving parliament and calling for new elections on May 27. Citing public threats against judges and political pressure, the court said it could not hear the claim on Wednesday, as previously planned, and rescheduled the hearing for April 17. Several judges also asked the state to provide them with bodyguards, and indirectly blamed Yushchenko for the pressure campaign. Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych [BBC profile] and other leaders of the Ukrainian Parliament [official website] appealed to the Constitutional Court [JURIST report] last week after Yushchenko issued the decree. In the meantime, officials in both Ukraine and Russia, including the speaker of the Russian Duma, have denounced the decree as unconstitutional and undemocratic. Yushchenko's supporters have criticized Russia for interfering in Ukraine's domestic affairs.
Yushchenko and Yanukovych were fierce rivals in the 2004 presidential election [JURIST report], and the two men have clashed over parliamentary attempts to expand the cabinet's power since Yushchenko reluctantly accepted Yanukovych as prime minister [JURIST reports] last June. Recent attempts to negotiate have proven unsuccessful, and Yushchenko subsequently threatened to prosecute officials [JURIST reports] who disobeyed his decree. Thousands of supporters of Yanukovych continue to protest in the streets of Kiev, the Ukrainian capital. AFP has more. RIA Novosti has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

JURIST takes Webby honors for second straight year
Jeannie Shawl on April 10, 2007 2:51 PM ET

[JURIST] JURIST has been recognized as an Official Honoree in the Law category in the 2007 Webby Awards [awards website]. The 11th Annual "Webbys" received a record 8,000 entries from over 60 countries and all 50 US states. Only sites in the top 15 percent were deemed Official Honorees. This is the first time in the Webbys' 11-year existence that an academic legal website has taken a distinction two years in a row. JURIST won [JURIST report] the Webby People's Voice Award as best Law website of 2006. Official honorees and nominees for the 2007 awards were announced in New York on Tuesday.
The final Webby nominees in Law this year are FindLaw, LawHelp.org, Nolo, Hollywood Reporter ESQ., and THOMAS. The Wall Street Journal's "Law Blog" and the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU joined JURIST as Webby Official Honorees.
Hailed as the "Oscars of the Internet" by the New York Times, the Webby Awards is the leading international award honoring excellence on the Internet, including websites, interactive advertising, online film & video, and mobile websites. The awards are judged by the International Academy of Digital Arts & Sciences, a global organization that includes David Bowie, Harvey Weinstein, Arianna Huffington, Matt Groening, Jamie Oliver, Internet inventor Vinton Cerf, and RealNetworks CEO Rob Glaser.
JURIST is headquartered at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law [law school website] and is powered by a team of over 40 law student reporters, editors and web developers [staff list] led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts [profile] who volunteer their time and talent to the project, working with leading legal experts from around the world to provide up-to-the minute legal news, primary source research and analysis as an educational service to the public and the legal community.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush to veto stem cell research bill: White House
Brett Murphy on April 10, 2007 2:22 PM ET

[JURIST] President George W. Bush will sign off on a bill providing funding for studies on embryos incapable of further development, but will refuse to endorse legislation that would subsidize stem cell research [JURIST news archive], the White House announced Tuesday. The administration said in a formal policy statement [PDF] sent to Congress that Bush would veto the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 [S.5 materials] because the law would "pay for research that relies on the intentional destruction of human embryos." The White House also said, however, that Bush would support [policy statement, PDF] the HOPE Act [S.30 materials] because it would provide funding for research into pluripotent stem cells that does not entail the destruction of embryos.
In July, Bush vetoed [JURIST report] the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 [PDF text; HR 810 summary] saying he refused to provide federal funding for stem cell research because many people consider the destruction of embryos murder [press briefing]. Simultaneously, Bush signed the Fetus Farming Prohibition Act [text; S 3504 summary], intended to prohibit "fetal farming," the method of creating fetuses for the sole purpose of research, after both the House and Senate passed the bill unanimously. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Gonzales subpoenaed for DOJ documents on US Attorney firings
James M Yoch Jr on April 10, 2007 1:36 PM ET

[JURIST] The US House Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena [PDF text] to US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] Tuesday for US Justice Department documents relating to the firings of eight US Attorneys [JURIST news archive]. In a letter accompanying the subpoena, committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) noted that the DOJ's "incomplete response" to the committee's request for documents "falls far short of what is needed for the Subcommittee and Committee to effectively exercise their oversight responsibilities in ascertaining the truth behind the very serious concerns that have been raised regarding this matter." AP has more.
The subpoena comes the day after four senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter [press release with text] to Gonzales, requesting additional undisclosed documents in that committee's investigation of the firings and claiming the DOJ failed to turn over relevant documents despite repeated calls from the Senate Judiciary Committee. The letter from US Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Charles Schumer (D-NY), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) [official websites] suggests that the DOJ has been less than forthright in disclosing documents: [W]e are concerned that additional documents relevant to the Committees' investigations are missing or have been withheld....
Given that this was a process that extended over more than two years and involved staff from both the Department of Justice and the White House, and involved consideration of a number of U.S. Attorneys, there would seem to be other documents that would comment upon the reasons some U.S. Attorneys were chosen for removal and others were not. For example, there are press reports that the former U.S. Attorney in San Francisco had multiple evaluations and was the subject of significant discussions. Documents reflecting those multiple evaluations and significant discussions have not been produced to date. This raises a question about whether we have seen all similar documents about others selected for replacement or left in place. In addition, the letter identifies specific undisclosed documents such as a chart provided by former Gonzales aide Monica Goodling to former chief of staff Kyle Sampson [official profile], who both resigned in the wake of the scandal, that was described in an e-mail that was turned over to the committee. The letter also outlines several document requests and poses questions from the committee concerning its disclosure procedures.
Last Thursday, Leahy sent a letter [press release with text] to White House counsel Fred Fielding seeking undisclosed documents relating to the firings from President George W. Bush. Last Monday, Leahy rejected attempts [JURIST report] by the Bush administration to move up the date that Gonzales is scheduled to testify. In March, Sampson told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the prosecutors were fired for political reasons [JURIST report] rather than for poor performance as the DOJ has claimed [JURIST report]. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Padilla judge refuses to dismiss terror charges over torture allegations
Brett Murphy on April 10, 2007 1:00 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge Tuesday denied [order, PDF] a motion to dismiss the terrorism charges [indictment, PDF] against Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive] based on Padilla's allegations that he was tortured [JURIST report] while detained as an "enemy combatant." Padilla has said that that he was abused, threatened, administered either PCP or LSD as a truth serum, and subjected to sleep deprivation and stress positions while in military custody, allegations denied by the government. US District Judge Marcia Cooke [official profile] ruled that the standards for "outrageous government conduct" were not satisfied and said that while the court was not deciding the issue of whether the torture occurred, Padilla failed to present a cognizable claim of outrageous government conduct entitling him to dismissal of the indictment... Applying the exclusionary rule to bar inclusion of any illegally obtained evidence would sufficiently satisfy due process concerns. Cooke has previously refused to dismiss [JURIST report] the charges against Padilla, holding that his 3 1/2 years detainment did violate his right to a speedy trial. Padilla's trial is scheduled to begin next week.
Padilla, a US citizen, was arrested in 2002 at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport and subsequently detained as an "enemy combatant" at a Navy military brig in Charleston, South Carolina. Initially accused of planning to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb" [NRC factsheet] in the United States, Padilla went from enemy combatant to criminal defendant when he was finally charged [JURIST report] in November 2005 on unrelated counts of conspiracy to murder US nationals and supporting terrorist activity. He was transferred to civilian custody [JURIST report] in January 2006 and has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to the charges. In February, Padilla was ruled competent to stand trial [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bangladesh government softens emergency law but presses corruption probe
James M Yoch Jr on April 10, 2007 9:17 AM ET

[JURIST] Bangladesh's Emergency Powers Rules of 2007, instituted when Bangladeshi President Iajuddin Ahmed [Wikipedia profile] declared a state of emergency [JURIST report] in January, has been amended to require the approval of concerned state officials before suspects face trial, appeal, bail, or even investigation, according to an announcement from the Bangladeshi Ministry of Home Affairs [official website] Monday. The amendment also permits courts to set bail for defendants who have not been charged, overriding last month's amendment preventing judicial bail orders. The amendment preempts consideration by the Bangladesh High Court, postponed until April 15, of whether it has power to set bail despite the ordinance's previous suspension. PTI has more.
Also on Monday, police in Bangladesh [JURIST news archive] said they are investigating bribery allegations involving former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina [Virtual Bangladesh profile]. According to the allegations, Hasina accepted $441,000 in 1998 from businessman Tajul Islam Farooq in exchange for approval to build a power plant. The investigation is the latest in a string of corruption probes since Iajuddin assumed power. In recent weeks, government security forces have arrested dozens of politicians [JURIST news archive], mostly members of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Awami League [party websites]. Several major corruption trials are slated to begin [JURIST report] in the coming months. Transparency International [advocacy website] has listed Bangladesh as one of the world's most corrupt states. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|