 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, April 3, 2007 |
 |
|


UK bomb plotter accused of planning to attack US targets appeals life sentence
Alexis Unkovic on April 3, 2007 8:34 PM ET

[JURIST] Dhiren Barot [BBC profile], a British man who pleaded guilty [JURIST report] in October to planning a series of bombs on US and British targets, filed an appeal in Londons Court of Appeal Criminal Division [official website] Tuesday. Barot was sentenced to life in prison [JURIST report] in November after pleading guilty to conspiracy to murder for his role in the "Gas Limos Project" [Times report] bombing scheme to blow up three limousines filled with explosives in underground parking garages in Britain, as well as a separate plan to explode radioactive "dirty bombs." Lawyers for Barot argued Tuesday that he should not face life imprisonment for a charge that typically merits a fixed 20 to 30 year sentence. Lord Phillips, sitting with Lord Justice Latham and Mr Justice Treacy, did not issue an immediate ruling on the appeal.
In April 2005 Barot and two other men were indicted [text; JURIST report] in New York for US-related bomb plans in April 2005. In addition to attacks planned throughout the UK, prosecutors alleged that Barot planned to attack the International Monetary Fund and World Bank [official websites] buildings in Washington DC, the New York Stock Exchange and Citigroup buildings in New York City, and the Prudential [corporate websites] building in Newark, New Jersey. London's Daily Telegraph has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush calls on Congress to promote new fuels after Supreme Court emissions ruling
Joe Shaulis on April 3, 2007 8:08 PM ET

[JURIST] President Bush urged Congress on Tuesday to adopt his proposed targets for alternative fuel use [White House energy policy materials] as a way of combating greenhouse gas emissions [JURIST news archive; EPA backgrounder] a day after the US Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. EPA [opinion text; JURIST report] that the Clean Air Act [text; EPA materials] gives the Environmental Protection Agency [official website] authority to regulate automobile emissions. Speaking at a Rose Garden press conference, Bush said [official transcript]: First of all, the decision of the Supreme Court we take very seriously. It's the new law of the land. And secondly, we're taking some time to fully understand the details of the decision. ... My attitude is, is that we have laid out a plan that will affect greenhouse gases that come from automobiles by having a mandatory fuel standard that insists upon using 35 billion gallons of alternative fuels by 2017, which will reduce our gasoline usage by 20 percent and halt the growth in greenhouse gases that emanate from automobiles. In other words, there is a remedy available for Congress. And I strongly hope that they pass this remedy quickly. Bush, who opposes mandatory limits on carbon dioxide emissions, also reiterated his belief that rapidly developing countries such as China and India must do more to control pollution. Scientific research suggests that man-made greenhouse gases contribute to global warming [EPA backgrounder]. Reuters has more.
Efforts to establish national emissions limits have gained traction in Congress [NYT report] since the Democrats became the majority party. Last month, former CIA director John Deutch recommended in a report to international civic leaders [JURIST report] that the United States enact an EU-style cap-and-trade program among other measures to control greenhouse gas emissions. In January, a coalition of US businesses and environmental groups called for federal legislation to limit emissions [JURIST report]. Overseas, the British government last month introduced a draft environmental bill [JURIST report] that could control greenhouse gas emissions through 2050.
This report was prepared in partnership with the Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US intelligence agents using secret prisons in Ethiopia: AP
Ryan Olden on April 3, 2007 7:23 PM ET

[JURIST] United States intelligence agents from the FBI [JURIST news archive; official website] and the CIA [JURIST news archive; official website] have been using secret prisons in Ethiopia [JURIST news archive] to conduct interrogations, according to AP Tuesday. The report alleges that men, women, and children from the neighboring African nations of Somalia and Kenya [JURIST news archives] have been secretly transferred to Ethiopia for questioning by US officials, hunting Muslim extremists. Though officials in the Ethiopian government were quick to deny these allegations, western security officials stated they had prisoners with links to al-Qaeda in custody. Based on reports from human rights groups [HRW report], AP reported that Kenyan authorities seized Somali refugees fleeing the recent violence in their country and then secretly flew them to Ethiopia for interrogation by US agents. The first abductee to speak out about her experiences, Kamilya Mohammedi Tuweni, said she was abducted and beaten in Kenya before being shipped to Ethiopia, where she was questioned by an American agent.
Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] first claimed [JURIST report] Saturday that the US, Kenya and Ethopia were cooperating with the transitional government of Somalia to detain refugees [press release]. "US security agents have routinely interrogated people held incommunicado," said Georgette Gagnon, Deputy Director of Human Rights Watch in Africa. Though the prisoners were primarily from the Horn of Africa, citizens of western nations such as Sweden, Canada, and even the United States are also said to be incarcerated in Ethiopia. If substantiated, secret jails and interrogations in Africa could prove an embarrassing counterpart to the US's European extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive] program. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FCC order strengthens pretexting regulations
Brett Murphy on April 3, 2007 2:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) [official website] adopted new privacy rules [FCC press release, PDF; order, PDF] for telephone and wireless companies on Tuesday aimed at strengthening safeguards against pretexting [JURIST news archive], the disclosure of personal telephone records to unauthorized individuals. The new rules include carrier authentication requirements, additional notice requirements, and annual certification requirements. Commenting on the new rules, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin [official profile] said in a prepared statement [text, PDF] that the regulations significantly strengthen existing safeguards by requiring express consent before a carrier can give a customers phone records to other parties for marketing purposes.
In January, President Bush signed into law [JURIST report] new federal legislation to protect telephone consumers from pretexting. The Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006 [text, PDF] was approved [JURIST report] by the US Senate in December in response to the Hewlett-Packard corporate spying scandal [JURIST news archive] that broke last summer. CNET News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ukraine PM seeks court review of presidential decree dissolving parliament
Jeannie Shawl on April 3, 2007 11:46 AM ET

[JURIST] Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych [BBC profile] and leaders of the Ukrainian Parliament filed a lawsuit Tuesday seeking to block a decree from Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko [official website; BBC profile] to dissolve parliament and hold elections in May. Yushchenko issued the decree [statement] Monday, saying that his "actions are dictated by the crucial necessity to save the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to ensure the adherence to the constitution and the observance of civil rights and freedoms." Yushchenko accused the country's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada [official website], of "deliberately escalating" the latest political crisis [BBC Q&A] in the country, saying there are three "dangerous tendencies" in the parliament: The first one is the unconstitutional process to form and expand the parliamentary coalition. Under the constitution, the coalition can be formed by deputy factions and not by individual or group members. Any other way is a revision of the will of the nation and the most cynical challenge for each of us.
The second tendency is the practice to pass illegitimate and unconstitutional laws. The most recent example is the Law on the Cabinet of Ministers, which systemically violates the constitution of Ukraine and is an attack on Ukraine's constitutional order.
The third tendency is their inability to fulfill obligations and fraudulent policy of intrigues and betrayals disguised as national unity slogans....
Violations of the Constitution of Ukraine, the biggest of them being the unconstitutional way of coalition formation, created obvious legal and political reasons to dissolve parliament. Yushchenko acknowledged that calling new elections was "extreme" but said that he was obliged to act under the Ukrainian constitution [text]. The president pledged that the parliamentary elections would be "held in accordance with Ukraine's constitution, as well as the national and international standards of democracy."
Yanukovych, Yushchenko's political rival, and top legislators have filed an appeal [Reuters report] with the Ukrainian Constitutional Court [official website], asking for a ruling within five days. The prime minister has indicated that members of parliament's majority coalition will continue to meet in the parliament hall pending a decision from the court. Parliament has also voted to fire the current Central Elections Commission of Ukraine [official website] and reinstate the previous commission, and the majority has said that the funding necessary to hold elections will be withheld. Yushchenko called the vote to reinstate the previous commission "unlawful" and "immoral" [press release]. The previous commission was accused of fraud [JURIST report] in the 2004 presidential election which brought Yushchenko to power. Bloomberg has more. AP has additional coverage.
Yushchenko and Yanukovych were fierce rivals in the 2004 presidential election [JURIST report], the results of which were invalidated by the country's Supreme Court [JURIST report] following fraud allegations. Yushchenko was sworn in as Ukraine's president [JURIST report] in January 2005 on the wings of the populist Orange Revolution [BBC timeline] after winning a re-vote. Yushchenko reluctantly accepted Yanukovych as prime minister last June and the two have since clashed over parliamentary attempts to expand the cabinet's power [JURIST reports] at the expense of the presidency.
1:57 PM ET - The Constitutional Court has agreed to hear the appeal. Itar-Tass has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Massachusetts governor orders out-of-state same-sex marriages registered
Holly Manges Jones on April 3, 2007 7:44 AM ET

[JURIST] Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick [official website] has directed the Massachusetts Department of Public Health [official website] to register the same-sex marriages [JURIST news archive] of 26 couples from outside the state whose licenses were not previously allowed to be included in state records by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney [Wikipedia profile]. The couples were married in 2004 in four Massachusetts towns and cities which refused to follow an order by Romney not to marry out-of-state same-sex couples. Patrick said Monday that he would support the repeal of a 1913 state statute [text], upheld [JURIST report] by the Massachusetts Supreme Court last year, which prohibits couples from marrying in Massachusetts if their marriage would not be legal in their own state.
Earlier this year, Massachusetts lawmakers lobbied for a proposed constitutional ban [JURIST report] on same-sex marriage which would strictly define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, though it would leave existing Massachusetts same-sex marriages intact. While the recognition of the 26 marriage certificates does not actually change the legal status of the marriages, Patrick's decision has been heralded by the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) [advocacy website] as a move toward treating same-sex couples equally to heterosexual couples. Patrick's order was criticized, however, by the Massachusetts Family Institute [advocacy website] which said Patrick was "placing his personal preference above the law." Monday's New York Times has more.
Massachusetts is currently the only US state to recognize same-sex marriage, after a November 2003 state high court ruling [JURIST report; background materials], and more than 8,000 same-sex couples have since been wed there.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Apple faces EU antitrust probe into iTunes
Holly Manges Jones on April 3, 2007 7:12 AM ET

[JURIST] The European Commission [official website] is investigating Apple's iTunes [JURIST news archive] to determine if sales restrictions based on the buyer's country of residence violate EU antitrust laws, according to a commission statement confirming the probe [press release] Tuesday. Music buyers in Europe are currently only able to download songs or albums from the iTunes store in their own country, which the commission says restricts buyers in terms of what music is available and the cost of each purchase. Depending on where in Europe the buyer lives, music prices can vary by as much as $0.24 for a single song. A spokesman for Apple [corporate website] said Monday that the company would like to make the costs and availability to Europeans uniform across the 27-nation EU, but music labels and publishers have limited Apple's rights in Europe.
Apple could face significant fines if found in violation of EU antitrust [JURIST news archive] laws. The company has two months to respond to a letter from the European Commission containing questions about its iTunes sales practice in Europe. Last year, France passed legislation [JURIST report] allowing French regulators to force Apple to make its iPod player compatible with songs downloaded from other Internet music stores, and downloads from its iTunes service compatible with other players. Similar legislation has been proposed in Britain, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Poland. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|