Federal court weighs Pennsylvania city laws against illegal immigrants

[JURIST] The US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania [official website] heard opening statements Monday in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of two laws passed by the city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania [official website; legal defense website] that make it more difficult for illegal immigrants to live or work in the town. Lozano v. City of Hazleton [case information, docket], which could take up to two weeks at trial, is reportedly the first case to address whether local governments can enact legislation to combat illegal immigration [JURIST news archive]. US District Judge James Munley [official profile] granted [JURIST report] a temporary restraining order [text, PDF] in November precluding enforcement of the Illegal Immigration Relief Act [text, PDF] and Landlord Tenant Ordinance [text, PDF] pending the outcome of the case.

Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta [official website] says the laws passed in July are an appropriate response to illegal immigration, while numerous community groups, business owners, and advocacy groups including the Pennsylvania chapter [advocacy website] of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] and Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund [advocacy website; case materials] maintain that the measures are illegal. AP has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.