 |
|

Legal news from Monday, February 12, 2007 |
 |
|


Idaho Senate committee approves parental consent for abortions
Caitlin Price on February 12, 2007 8:31 PM ET

[JURIST] An Idaho State Senate [official website] committee Monday passed a bill requiring written parental consent for minors to get abortions [JURIST news archive]. In a 7-2 vote, the State Affairs Committee approved Senate Bill No. 1082 [text], which amends, repeals and adds to existing law relating to abortion to revise a public records exemption; provide[s] for criminal act state of mind; provide[s] procedures for obtaining consent for abortions for minors; provide[s] for reporting by courts; and provide[s] statistical records. The bill provides judge-approved exceptions for incest, abuse, or threats to the mother's health, although opponents say that hearings could lead to dangerous bureaucratic delays. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Russ Fulcher [official website], said that objections to earlier versions of the bill, including a requirement that minor recipients of medical-emergency abortions must inform a parent after the procedure, were removed. The bill will now go to the entire Senate. AP has more.
In 2004 the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned Idaho's parental consent law [JURIST report] in Planned Parenthood of Idaho v. Wasden [opinion, PDF] on the grounds that it was unconstitutional because the medical necessity exception in the law was too narrow. The following year, the US Supreme Court declined to hear [JURIST report] the state's appeal challenging the decision. Currently only six states and the District of Columbia [NCSL backgrounder] do not require parental notification before a minor receives an abortion.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Portugal PM to seek abortion legalization despite low referendum turnout
Holly Manges Jones on February 12, 2007 8:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The Portuguese government plans to seek approval in the Portuguese Parliament [official website, in Portuguese] of a proposal to make abortion legal in the country, despite low turnout [JURIST report] in Sunday's referendum on loosening the current law [text, in Portuguese]. Approximately 59 percent of voters were in favor of loosening restrictions against abortion, while 41 percent voted to keep abortion illegal. Only 40 percent of the population turned out, less than the 50 percent threshold requirement to support a change in the law. Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Socrates [official profile] of the ruling Socialist party [party website, in Portuguese] said Monday that he was not deterred by the numbers, contending there were enough "yes" votes for parliament to lift the abortion ban.
Jose Ribeiro e Castro [Wikipedia profile], head of the opposing Popular party [party website, in Portuguese], said however that the turnout was not sufficient to show that the people of Portugal wanted the anti-abortion law loosened. The country's new abortion law would allow abortions in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, while the present law only allows abortions in order to save the woman's life, in rape cases, or if the baby will be born with a deformity or incurable disease. A specific date for a parliamentary vote to lift the abortion ban has not yet been set. Reuters has more. BBC News has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

First Louisiana trial for Hurricane Katrina insurers set to start
Holly Manges Jones on February 12, 2007 7:13 AM ET

[JURIST] Jury selection begins Monday in the first trial of thousands of lawsuits brought by Louisiana homeowners affected by the Hurricane Katrina disaster [JURIST news archive] against their insurance companies. Homeowners Lawrence and Elizabeth Tomlinson are suing Allstate [corporate website] insurance company in federal court for bad faith, alleging that the insurance carrier did not correctly adjust their claim and also did not start adjusting the claim within the 30-day required time limit. Allstate maintains that they properly paid the couple in the amount of $100,000 for damage to their home, personal belongings, and living expenses, and that the Tomlinsons misrepresented part of their claim.
Meanwhile, 350 lawsuits are pending in Mississippi against insurance companies over the separate issue of whether their insurance policies should cover water damage when the policies, as written, cover wind damage created by a hurricane, but not water damage by "wind-driven surge." Last month, a federal judge temporarily rejected [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] a proposed settlement [JURIST report] by State Farm [corporate website] to pay $80 million to 640 policyholders who sued the company and another $50 million to approximately 35,000 other homeowners in Mississippi who did not sue State Farm after their claims were denied. The judge said the agreement between State Farm and Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood [official website] did not contain enough information to ensure that it was a fair and reasonable settlement. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|