 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, February 7, 2007 |
 |
|


Mistrial declared in court-martial of US Army officer opposing Iraq war
Jaime Jansen on February 7, 2007 7:38 PM ET

[JURIST] The military judge overseeing the court-martial [JURIST report] of US Army 1st Lt. Ehren Watada [advocacy website; JURIST news archive] declared a mistrial Wednesday after throwing out a pretrial agreement in which Watada admitted that he failed to deploy to Iraq [JURIST report] with the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division [official website] in June. Watada was initially charged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] with missing troop movement, contempt toward officials, and multiple specifications [JURIST report] of conduct unbecoming. The judge, Lt. Col. John Head, stated that the agreement was enough to find Watada guilty, and prosecutors moved for a mistrial because the jury had already seen the pretrial agreement. Head granted a new trial, which is tentatively scheduled for March.
Watada, a 28-year-old Honolulu native who is the first commissioned officer in the US military to publicly refuse deployment to Iraq, refuses to be classified as a conscientious objector because he does not object to war in general, just to the "illegal" war in Iraq. He offered to serve in Afghanistan, but the US Army refused. His vocal protests and participation in rallies by Veterans for Peace [advocacy website] and Courage to Resist [advocacy website] led to the charges of conduct unbecoming an officer and the original charge of contempt toward officials. Last month, Head ruled that Watada could not argue the legality of the war [JURIST report] as part of his defense during his court-martial, and on Monday on the opening day of the trial Head directly barred [JURIST report] international and constitutional law scholars from testifying on the point. The Seattle Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former US Army officers indicted in Iraq money laundering scheme
Brett Murphy on February 7, 2007 3:23 PM ET

[JURIST] Three former US Army officers and two civilians were indicted by a federal grand jury on Wednesday for charges relating to a scheme to defraud the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) [official website] in Iraq. Army Colonel Curtis G. Whiteford, Army Lt. Colonels Debra M. Harrison and Michael B. Wheeler allegedly engaged in a bidding scam with US businessman Philip H. Bloom that awarded over $8 million to contractors in exchange for money, cars, and jewelry. According to a DOJ press release the Army officers rigged "the bids on contracts being awarded by the CPA-SC so that all of the contracts were awarded to Bloom" and received in return "over $1 million in cash, SUVs, sports cars, a motorcycle, jewelry, computers, business class airline tickets, liquor, promise of future employment with Bloom, and other items of value."
In April, Bloom pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to charges of conspiracy, bribery and money laundering. Last month, he was sentenced to nine years imprisonment [JURIST report] on those charges, and told to forfeit $3.6 million he received for awarding contracts to American companies. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italy to try US soldier in shooting death of intelligence agent in Iraq
Kate Heneroty on February 7, 2007 1:59 PM ET

[JURIST] An Italian judge Wednesday ordered New York Army National Guard [official website] soldier Mario Lozano [Wikipedia profile] to stand trial on charges of voluntary homicide in connection with the death of Italian intelligence agent Nicola Calipari [BBC profile] at a US checkpoint in Iraq in March 2005. Calipari was shot to death in 2005 while driving to the Baghdad airport after securing the release of Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena [Wikipedia profile] from Iraqi kidnappers. A second Italian agent, Andrea Carpani, was also wounded when US soldiers perceived the car as insurgents speeding through a security checkpoint.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman says, however, that the US would not hand Lozano over for trial, which is scheduled to begin April 17. US and Italian officials have failed to agree [JURIST report] on details surrounding Calipari's death. A US investigation [JURIST report] into the incident cleared US soldiers of any wrongdoing but an initial Italian probe [JURIST report], while concluding the killing was accidental, found that there were serious miscommunications among US officials in Iraq and confusion about the rules of engagement for checkpoints. Italy's independent prosecutors refused to agree with the Ministry of Defence that the shooting was accidental.
Calipari's widow, now a member of the Italian Senate [official site, in Italian], said she was satisfied with the decision to prosecute Lozano. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Khodorkovsky lambastes latest 'absurd' indictment
Joshua Pantesco on February 7, 2007 11:17 AM ET

[JURIST] Jailed Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky [JURIST news archive] on Wednesday condemned new charges [MBK statement; JURIST report] brought against him by the Russian government earlier this week, calling the indictment "absurd and ungrounded." Prosecutors charged Khodorkovsky and business associate Platon Lebedev with money laundering and embezzlement based on allegations that Khodorkovsky used his Open Russia Foundation [SourceWatch backgrounder] to funnel oil revenues away from oil company Yukos. If convicted on the new charges, Khodorkovsky and Lebedev could serve up to fifteen more years in prison. Khodorkovsky is eligible for parole for time served later this year following his May 2005 conviction for tax evasion [JURIST report], for which he received an eight-year prison sentence.
In a statement [text] posted on his defense website, Khodorkovsky said: The next things that will happen are absolutely obvious to us: false and fraudulent evidence, statements by frightened or misled pseudo-witnesses, and most likely a guilty verdict. It is a shameful farce that has nothing to do with the rule of law.
The reason why all this is being done is also quite obvious. The people who invented the "Khodorkovsky case" in order to steal Yukos, the most prosperous company in Russia, are very much afraid to see me set free and want to insure themselves against the possibility of my conditional release....
They still have a potential exit strategy though, along with the opportunity to save their position and secure long-term guarantees. Their only chance is the timely and voluntary transfer of power in Russia by the means of honest, fair and transparent elections, in which the new president of our country will be elected. This new person should have nothing in common with the giant corruption machine that has paralyzed Russia, and this person should display a respect toward judicial independence....
A priori false accusations ordered by political authorities are easily stamped by investigators and signed off by the court. And the current ruling elite and power bears no shame. The court, a subservient instrument of the vertical of power, will of course deliver a guilty verdict... On Tuesday, US State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack criticized the charges [JURIST report], saying they raise "serious questions about the rule of law in Russia." AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN signs contested Hariri tribunal agreement
Joshua Pantesco on February 7, 2007 10:53 AM ET

[JURIST] The UN signed an agreement Tuesday to create an international tribunal [JURIST news archive] to try suspects accused of assassinating former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri [official website] in February 2005. The agreement must now be ratified by the Lebanese parliament [Wikipedia backgrounder]. Nabih Berri [official profile], the pro-Syrian speaker of parliament, opposes the Hariri tribunal and has refused to convene parliament, thus avoiding a vote on the agreement.
Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Saniora [BBC profile] forwarded a signed copy of the agreement to the UN last week, but pro-Syrian Lebanese President Emile Lahoud [official profile] has said Saniora's actions violate the Lebanese constitution [AP report]. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Lahoud said that the proposal had been signed by the director-general of the Ministry of Justice and that a letter from Saniora forwarding the signed proposal back to the UN "sidestepped reality and the rules of the constitution, conventions and national unity." In a statement [text] Tuesday, Ban's spokesperson said: It is up to the competent Lebanese authorities to take the steps necessary under the Lebanese Constitution for the approval and ratification of the Agreement, to allow it to enter into force. The Tribunal could then be made operational with the full support of the United Nations. Last November, the Lebanese cabinet approved a draft plan [JURIST report] for the tribunal, but pro-Syrian factions said the draft plan lacked legitimacy because all six pro-Syrian cabinet members resigned prior to the vote. The UN News Service has more. Reuters has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Apple CEO urges music industry to drop digital anti-piracy protection
Brett Murphy on February 7, 2007 7:26 AM ET

[JURIST] Apple Inc. [corporate website] CEO Steve Jobs called on four of the largest record companies who distribute their music through iTunes to allow Apple to sell music without anti-piracy protection in an letter placed on Apple's website Tuesday. Jobs presented a series of "alternatives" for the future of digital music sold through Apple, and encouraged record companies to abandon the use of anti-piracy measures, known as digital rights management (DRM) [Wikipedia backgrounder], saying "DRMs haven't worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy." Jobs said that the overhead required by the use of DRM may be preventing some companies from using it, writing that "if such requirements were removed, the music industry might experience an influx of new companies willing to invest in innovative new stores and players."
The removal of DRM would also help to ease the pressure Apple has felt from many European countries who have brought lawsuits against Apple alleging that DRM systems have prevented consumers from being able to listen to iTunes-downloaded music on other media players, and have therefore stifled competition. In 2005, a French consumer group sued both Apple and Sony alleging that the companies limit consumer choice [JURIST report] by preventing downloaded songs from being played on other media players. Last summer, France enacted copyright legislation [legislative materials, in French; JURIST report] allowing French regulators to force Apple to make its iPod player compatible with songs downloaded from other Internet music stores, and downloads from its iTunes service compatible with other players. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|