 |
|

Legal news from Monday, January 29, 2007 |
 |
|


Guantanamo military trials face further delays
JURIST Staff on January 29, 2007 8:19 PM ET

[JURIST] Fewer Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] prisoners will be charged with war crimes this week than originally expected, chief prosecutor USAF Col. Moe Davis [official profile, PDF] told Reuters Monday. Revised charges were expected to be filed against up to 20 suspected members of al Qaeda and the Taliban by February, but new procedural rules [manual, PDF] implemented earlier this month will delay the trials for at least half of those detainees. Under the new rules, hearings must take place before a tribunal judge within 30 days of the filing of charges; the trial must commence within 120 days of the charging. Davis also pointed to Guantanamo's limited facilities as partially responsible for the delay, as only one courtroom is available.
Davis said that he was very likely to recommend the death penalty for some of the 14 high-value detainees [DNI backgrounder, PDF] moved to the camp [JURIST report] from CIA secret prisons in September. First evidence is expected to be presented by this summer. Davis also said Monday that Australian detainee David Hicks [JURIST news archive] will likely be among those charged [JURIST report] this week. Reuters has more.
The US Supreme Court effectively dismissed the charges against the original 10 Guantanamo defendants accused of terrorism in June when it rejected [JURIST report] President Bush's initial military commission system, saying it was created without proper authorization from Congress. In response, the Republican-dominated Congress created a new military tribunal system [JURIST report] this past September when it passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) [PDF text; JURIST news archive], elaborated in the manual [JURIST report] published January 18.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italy justice minister opposes government same-sex rights proposal
Brett Murphy on January 29, 2007 3:08 PM ET

[JURIST] Italian Justice Minister Clemente Mastella [official website, in Italian] has said that he will refuse to vote for a proposed law [JURIST report] that would give same-sex couples [JURIST news archive] many of the rights that heterosexual couples enjoy. In comments over the weekend, Mastella called the proposal immoral and said that Prime Minister Romano Prodi's current governing coalition must not be made "hostages" of the radical left.
Last week, Cardinal Camillo Ruini [Wikipedia profile], head of the Catholic bishops in Italy, denounced the proposed legislation [JURIST report] while speaking to a conference of Italian bishops, alleging that same-sex unions went against the basic purpose of marriage - to produce children. The proposed legislation would give same-sex couples combined medical insurance, the right to visit their partner in prisons or hospitals, inheritance rights, and decision-making authority should one partner become sick. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Germany backs away from EU-wide Holocaust laws
James M Yoch Jr on January 29, 2007 3:05 PM ET

[JURIST] The German EU presidency said Monday that it would support EU anti-racism legislation [press release] that would impose maximum one to three-year terms of imprisonment for "[p]ublic incitement to hatred and violence for reasons of racism or xenophobia," but would not push for any law that would explicitly ban swastikas [JURIST report] or criminalize Holocaust denial across the European Union (EU) [official website]. The proposed Framework Decision would criminalize "[p]ublic approval, denial or gross minimisation of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes" but would allow each EU country, through a national or international court, to determine what constitutes genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes for purposes of the ban.
The reluctance of some member states to criminalize swastikas and Holocaust denial most likely caused Germany to forgo plans for EU-wide prohibitions despite earlier statements [JURIST report]. Last week, EU Freedom, Security and Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini [official website; BBC profile] urged the 27 EU nations [JURIST report] to adopt EU-wide laws criminalizing denial of the Holocaust and incitement of hatred and racial violence; on Friday, however, Italy published a draft law [JURIST report] proposing prison sentences for race-based hate crimes, but not making Holocaust denial an explicit crime. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Portuguese march against abortion legalization referendum
Alexis Unkovic on January 29, 2007 10:38 AM ET

[JURIST] Anti-abortion protestors took to the streets in Lisbon, Portugal [JURIST news archive] Sunday in advance of a referendum vote scheduled for February 11 in which voters will decide whether to ease restrictions imposed by the current Portuguese abortion law [text, in Portuguese]. The Portuguese Parliament [official website, in Portuguese] approved [JURIST report] the national referendum in October after the ruling Socialist Party [party website, in Portuguese] proposed [press release, in Portuguese; JURIST report] the idea in September. If passed, the referendum would legalize abortion up until the 10th week of pregnancy for all women. The current law only permits an abortion [JURIST news archive] up until the 12th week of pregnancy in cases of risk to the mother's health, up until the 16th week in cases of rape, and up to the 24th week in cases of fetal malformation.
In 1998, a similar referendum on legalizing abortion was declared void due to low voter turnout. This time, over 50 percent of registered voters must cast their ballots for the referendum to be valid, while current opinion polls reportedly show support for the measure waning. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Libya offers to release foreign medics convicted in AIDS trial if compensated
Katerina Ossenova on January 29, 2007 9:17 AM ET

[JURIST] Libya is willing to release of five Bulgarian nurses convicted of infecting over 400 Libyan patients, primarily children [JURIST news archive] in exchange for compensation, Seif al-Islam, the son of Libyan leader Colonel Muhamar Gaddafi [BBC profile], told the Bulgarian newspaper 24 Hours [media website] Monday. Seif al-Islam said the plan - designed to satisfy the parents of those affected as well as Libya, Bulgaria, and the EU - anticipates "substantial compensation for the families of those affected." Al-Islam also promised that Libya would not carry out the death sentences against the six medics, adding "there will be no executions... Libya is not Iraq."
The five Bulgarian nurses and one Palestinian doctor were convicted and sentenced [JURIST report] to death in their second trial on December 19 after the initial guilty verdict was overturned by the Libyan Supreme Court in 2005 and a retrial ordered [JURIST reports]. Bulgaria and its allies, including the US [JURIST report] and the European Union, contend that the nurses are innocent and have said they have been tortured into admitting guilt in the case [BBC trial timeline; BBC Q&A]. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOD cutting back 'stop-loss' military service extensions despite court OKs
Katerina Ossenova on January 29, 2007 8:48 AM ET

[JURIST] US Defense Secretary Robert Gates [official profile] has ordered all branches of the military to minimize their use of "stop loss" tactics to keep soldiers on active duty beyond their service contracts, notwithstanding a series of court rulings upholding the controversial practice. The "stop loss" policy [Wikipedia backgrounder], long criticized as a "backdoor draft," allows each branch of the military to keep troops for three months prior to and following a deployment and to prevent troops from retiring or separating prior to deployments. Gates has set a February 28 deadline for each service to come up with ways to cut down their use of "stop loss." US Army spokeswoman Rhonda Paige has indicated that a total of 10,711 soldiers were subject to stop-loss restrictions [Stars and Stripes report] as of 31 December 2006; the Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force have not used the program since 2003. AP has more.
In 2005, citing the potential for substantial disruption and diversion of military resources, US District Judge Royce C. Lambert refused to release [JURIST report] a "stop loss" soldier from Army duty. Three months later, in the context of a lawsuit launched by a soldier posted to Afghanistan, a panel of the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling [PDF] upholding the military's power [JURIST report] to issue emergency "stop-loss" orders pursuant to presidential authorization [US Code Title 10, s. 12305 text].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Norway proposes law overturning stem cell research ban
Holly Manges Jones on January 29, 2007 7:12 AM ET

[JURIST] The government of Norway has proposed new legislation that would allow embryonic stem cell research [JURIST news archive] to potentially find cures for various diseases. Norwegian Minister of Health and Care Services Silvia Brustad [official website, English version] said late last week that the government hoped researchers could use the stem cells to find potential cures for AIDS, cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. Under current Norwegian law, fertilized eggs or stem cells are not able to be used in research, and eggs created for artificial insemination must be destroyed. Brustad said passing the legislation would bring Norway more in line with other European nations, including Germany, Italy and Slovenia, which approved [JURIST report] an EU research budget to fund stem cell research last year.
The proposed legislation would require consent from parents before stem cells are used for research and also requires a national ethics panel to approve the research before it commences. The legislation would also prohibit the fertilization of eggs specifically for research; only extra embryos of poor quality produced through in vitro fertilization [Wikipedia backgrounder] or extras that have been stored for over five years may be used. The ruling coalition currently has the necessary majority to pass the legislation, but it is unknown whether any lawmakers from the Labour, Center or Socialist parties will oppose the controversial amendment. AP has more.
Last year Australia lifted its restrictions on stem cell research [JURIST report] and also approved the therapeutic cloning of human embryos. In the United States, the House of Representatives passed a bill earlier this month which would amend the Public Health Service Act to allow for additional embryonic stem cell research [JURIST report]. The White House has promised to veto the bill. President Bush vetoed an earlier embryonic stem cell research bill [JURIST report] last summer.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|