 |
|

Legal news from Monday, January 15, 2007 |
 |
|


Bavarian headscarf ban upheld in German state court
Leslie Schulman on January 15, 2007 8:01 PM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of the German state of Bavaria [official website, in German] Monday upheld [press release, in German] a 2004 state law [BBC report] which bans teachers from wearing religious headscarves [JURIST news archive]. An Islamic religious group had sued the state claiming the law was unconstitutional under the Bavarian state constitution [text] because it eliminated Muslim symbols from the classroom yet still allowed Christian and Jewish images to be displayed. Officials speaking for the state argued the ban was valid because as opposed to the cross and other religious markings, the headscarf is worn only by women and thus its wearing mitigated against gender equality as guaranteed under the constitution.
Headscarves have been the topic of fierce debate in Germany since teacher Fereshta Ludin [Pluralism Project backgrounder] filed suit after being denied a job in Stuttgart in 1998. Ludin argued that the German constitution guaranteed her right to wear the headscarf. A federal German court ruled in September 2003 [BBC report] that under then-current laws, she was correct, but it also noted that individual states could pass laws banning the headwear. Since then, eight German states have implemented such bans, including most recently the state of North-Rhine Westphalia [DW report]. Deutsche Welle has more.
In related news Monday, Egyptian minister of religious endowments minister Hamdy Zaqzuq has said that he has forbidden women working as religious counselors from wearing face veils, because it was custom, not religion-based, to do so. His statements came the same day he had a woman removed from a training session [Demaz report] for wearing the face veil. Zaqzuq said that those who continued to wear the full veil would no longer act as religious counselors and would instead assume administrative positions within the ministry. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Burundi ex-president acquitted of coup and assassination charges
Leslie Schulman on January 15, 2007 7:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Burundi President Domitien Ndayizeye [BBC profile] and four others were acquitted by the Supreme Court of Burundi [official website] Monday on charges of attempting a coup [JURIST report] and planning to assassinate current President Pierre Nkurunziza [Wikipedia profile]. Two other accused, Alain Mugabarabona and Tharcisse Ndayishimiye, were convicted and sentenced to jail on similar charges. Mugabarabona, the leader of the small National Liberation Forces (FNL) Hutu political party, allegedly masterminded the plot [IOL report]. After his arrest in August [JURIST report], he told radio stations [JURIST report] that he was tortured by the Burundi police and intelligence bureau Documentation Nationale and threatened with death if he did not admit that a coup plot existed. He claimed he was coerced into making false statements incriminating other alleged conspirators, including Ndayizeye and former Vice-President Alphonse-Marie Kadege. AFP has more. BBC has additional coverage
Nkurunziza, elected in August 2005 after a series of peace talks [BBC report] between the majority Hutus and the minority Tutsis, was the first president of Burundi to be democratically elected since the beginning of an ethnic civil war 12 years ago [Global Security backgrounder]. The war was sparked by the assassination of the country's first democratically elected Hutu president in 1993 and has since wracked Burundi, one of the world's poorest countries.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moroccan journalist, editor convicted of insulting Islam
Holly Manges Jones on January 15, 2007 10:40 AM ET

[JURIST] A Moroccan editor and journalist were both convicted Monday of insulting the Islamic religion in a 10-page article about religious jokes [BBC backgrounder] published in a Moroccan newspaper in early December. Journalist Sanaa al-Aji and Driss Ksikes, editor of Nichane [media website, in Arabic] weekly, were given suspended sentences of three years, fined $9,280 each, and are prohibited from engaging in any journalistic activity for two months. Prosecutors had asked the court to impose much harsher 3-5 year prison terms, but the pair said they still plan to appeal the sentences they did receive.
Moroccan Prime Minister Driss Jettou [Wikipedia profile] banned Nichane on December 21 after complaints began to surface on an Islamist website, and the trial against the two accused began a short time later. The National Press Union of Morocco and media rights group Reporters Without Borders [advocacy group] voiced their opposition to the trial [press release], insisting that Morocco was backtracking on efforts to lift media restrictions over the past few years. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam co-defendants hanged; defense lawyer slams 'murder'
Bernard Hibbitts on January 15, 2007 10:39 AM ET

[JURIST] Former Saddam-era Revolutionary Court judge Awad Hamed al-Bandar [Wikipedia profile] and former Iraqi intelligence chief Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti [GlobalSecurity profile; BBC profile], sentenced to death [JURIST report] with Saddam Hussein in November in connection with crimes against humanity committed in the town of Dujail in 1982, were executed before dawn Monday at an Iraqi military facility in Baghdad. As shown by official video shown to reporters afterwards by the Iraqi government [Reuters report], Tikriti suffered decapitation in the hanging, a result generally caused by allowing too long a drop for the victim [Reuters backgrounder]. Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh nonetheless said afterwards that the execution had proceeded properly, explaining [Reuters report] in reference to the prior unruly hanging of Hussein captured on a cell phone camera that "the convicts were not subjected to any mistreatment. Their rights were not violated. There was no chanting."
The executions came despite intense last-minute efforts by defense lawyers [JURIST report; additional report] and international leaders and activists opposed to the death penalty - including UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [JURIST report] - to have them stopped. Defense lawyer Giovanni di Stefano, who met several times with the defendants while they were still in detention at US Camp Cropper earlier this month, told [statement] JURIST by e-mail after the hangings Monday that as late as Sunday afternoon "it was more than clear that no executions would occur until at least 25th January 2007." Before leaving Baghdad for his office in Rome and after having filed a petition of commutation [DOC] with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani he said he also "spoke with the US military and made [it] clear that if there was to be any execution I wanted to exercise my rights - as requested by my clients - to be present. It was unlikely there would be any executions until the 30 days had passed, was the information given to me" [IHT application to attend execution, DOC]. Di Stefano insisted that in the circumstances, the execution of his clients was criminal: Since the executions were carried during a period that (a) was pending a decision from President Talabani whether to commute or not and (b) during the 30 days period in accordance with para. 266 [of the Iraqi Law on Criminal Proceedings] and (c) not in my presence the said executions are deemed an act of murder. It is for these reasons that I have requested the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court to open an investigation into the events against Maliki personally and members of the Iraqi Government that authorised the said executions during the said period. Di Stefano told JURIST that Bandar's son had already collected his fathers body.
International observers rapidly condemned the executions. In London, Amnesty International called the hangings "a brutal violation of the right to life and a further lost opportunity for Iraqis to properly hold to account those responsible for the crimes committed under Saddam Hussein's rule." Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty's Middle East and North Africa Programme, said in statement:Saddam Hussein and his aides should certainly have been held to account for the horrific human rights crimes committed by his government but this should have been through a fair trial process and without recourse to the death penalty. Reports that Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti had his head severed during the hanging only emphasis the brutality of this already cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment Visiting Rome, European Commission head Jose Manuel Barroso reacted to the executions by saying "We consider that a man does not have the right to take the life of another man", and announced his support [Reuters report] for an Italian initiative [JURIST report] started after the Hussein execution to get a UN ban on the death penalty worldwide.
11:30 AM ET - Defense lawyer and former Saddam defense counsel Curtis Doebbler has also condemned the executions in a statement sent to JURIST:The United States and Iraqi government carried out the summary, arbitrary and extra-judicial executions of Mr. Barzan al-Tikriti and Judge Awad Hamad al-Bandar. The executions were carried out in violations of international law and constitute a violation of the right to life and a war crime under international law because they were carried out after a trial that every independent expert that examined it called an unfair trial. On 1 September 2006, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detentions, who had examined the trial for two years gave a final opinion calling the trial unfair and a violation of international law. If the international community is to restore confidence in the rule of law in Iraq it must prosecute the individual responsible for the international crime of aggression against the Iraqi people and those who participated in providing the defendants in the Dujail trial an intentionally unfair trial. Only by calling for such prosecutions and ensuring they take place can the international community begin to restore trust in the rule of law. Failure to do so will send a clear message to vulnerable people everywhere who have been subjected to United States' aggression that they cannot depend on the rule of law to stop the United States and its collaborators from violating their most basic human rights and require these people to take the law into their own hands and take all necessary measures to end these illegal actions. 3:31 PM ET - From Geneva, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour has expressed "regret" at the hangings:I am opposed to capital punishment under all circumstances. In this particular case, not only is the penalty irremediable, it may also make it more difficult to have a complete judicial accounting of other, equally horrendous, crimes committed in Iraq.
Those responsible for serious human rights violations must be brought to justice, and this is crucial for effective national reconciliation. But, to be credible and durable, the fight against impunity must be based on respect for international human rights standards and the rule of law, and must not come at their expense. Read Arbour's full statement.
3:42 PM ET - The bodies of both Bandar and Tikriti have been buried in a cemetary garden in Ouja, outside of Tikrit, near the grave of Saddam Hussein [JURIST report] after a ceremony conducted in front of hundreds of mourners, including Bander's son and the governor of Iraq's Salahaddin province. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|