 |
|

Legal news from Friday, January 12, 2007 |
 |
|


Former Cambodian Khmer Rouge leader denies 'killing fields' genocide
Natalie Hrubos on January 12, 2007 9:54 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Khmer Rouge [JURIST news archive] leader Nuon Chea, who faces genocide charges in connection with the deaths of some 1.7 million people in Cambodia's notorious "killing fields" in the 1970s, denied in an interview published in the Phnom Penh Post Friday that Cambodia's communist regime committed genocide in the 1970s, saying the regime had no reason to kill its own people. Chea, who was the deputy of late Khmer Rouge chief Pol Pot, also said any document that links him to crimes against humanity has been manipulated. He will likely be tried before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) later this year. AP has more.
In early December, Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] accused the Cambodian government of delaying the genocide tribunals and interfering with the tribunal's judicial independence [JURIST report]. The ECCC was established by a 2001 law [text as amended 2005, PDF] to investigate and try those responsible for the 1975-79 Cambodian genocide. Although prosecutorial investigations are ongoing, no top Khmer Rogue officials have yet faced trial and questions have been raised concerning exactly how many of the Khmer Rouge's top officials will face the tribunal, as several of those responsible for the genocide have died [JURIST report] in recent months and others are in failing health.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOD official slams US law firms for defending Guantanamo detainees
Kate Heneroty on January 12, 2007 6:35 PM ET

[JURIST] US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs Charles "Cully" Stimson has set off a firestorm of protest by publicly questioning the propriety of some of the country's top law firms representing Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees. In an interview [recorded audio] on Federal News Radio [media website] Thursday on the fifth anniversary of the US military prison, Stimson predicted that "when corporate CEOs see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line in 2001 those CEO's are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms." The former Navy lawyer said "It's shocking...The major law firms in this country...are out there representing detainees."
Stimson cited a string of major US law firms defending clients at Guantanamo pro bono: Pillsbury Winthrop, Jenner & Block, Hunton & Williams, Alston & Bird, Cutler Pickering, Weil Gotshal, Paul Weiss Rifkin, Covington & Burling, Mayer Brown, Pepper Hamilton, Perkins Cole, Fulbright Jaworski, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, and Venable [firm websites].
Stimson's statements drew harsh criticism Friday from some of the lawyers involved in Guantanamo defense and from professional groups. David J. Cynamon [profile], a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman who is representing Kuwaiti detainees held at Guantanamo, told [statement] JURIST's Hotline: Apparently, the Bush Administration has no good answers to the legal and moral travesties at Guantanamo, so they have decided to fall back on good old-fashioned lawyer bashing in a desperate effort to change the subject. It is bad enough that they have consistently flouted the Supreme Court's 2004 ruling that the detainees are entitled to habeas corpus. Now they are attempting to prevent the detainees from having legal counsel at all. It is truly incredible that Stimson, an attorney himself, does not appear to understand or care about the fundamental obligation of lawyers to represent unpopular and indigent clients.
We and the other habeas counsel are very proud of the work we are doing on behalf of the Guantanamo detainees, and we are confident that the vast majority of our corporate clients feel the same way. The true "news story" here is not that prominent law firms are trying to get the detainees a fair hearing but that the Bush Administration is trying to deny them one. The President of the American Bar Association also issued a statement [text] Friday condemning Stimson's comments. Karen Mathis said:Lawyers represent people in criminal cases to fulfill a core American value: the treatment of all people equally before the law. To impugn those who are doing this critical work -- and doing it on a volunteer basis -- is deeply offensive to members of the legal profession, and we hope to all Americans. The American Bar Association supports lawyers who give of their time and expertise defending those involved in legal actions. In fact it is one of the basic tenets of the Association's Second Season of Service, that lawyers should perform pro bono and volunteer work. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman has since said that Stimson's comments "do not represent the views of the Defense Department or the thinking of its leadership." McClatchy Newspapers has more.
01/13/07 - The New York Times Saturday quoted [NYT report] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales as saying on the matter: "Good lawyers representing the detainees is the best way to ensure that justice is done in these cases."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ agencies face hiring freezes pending budget approvals
Leslie Schulman on January 12, 2007 5:26 PM ET

[JURIST] Three US Justice Department agencies - the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) [official website], the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) [official website] and the FBI [official website] - are freezing or slowing recruitment efforts largely as a result of a lack of increased funding from Congress' failure to approve requested 2007 budget increases [San Francisco Chronicle report] for the Justice Department. The DEA and ATF have said they are freezing the hiring of new employees, even though both agencies anticipate large numbers of unfilled positions this year. The FBI has slowed its hiring but will continue to hire for positions deemed essential. As the agencies await a decision by lawmakers if, and whether, to increase funding, they will continue to operate based on their 2006 budgets. But increased costs across the board, including an imminent increase of the federal minimum wage [AP report], make working with last year's budget unreasonable.
The 2006 budget [White House website] shows that last year the FBI received $5.7 billion in federal funding while the DEA received $2.4 billion. The DEA said it would be unable to sustain employment at its current level if Congress does not allot an additional $95 million, and ATF officials say they need $71 million more in order to maintain its 4,900 employees. Observers say that the failure to approve 2007 budgets for the DOJ agencies could impede efforts to counter both violent crime and terrorism. While other agencies are feeling the burden of the lack of budget approval, Congress has already approved budgets for the military and for homeland security. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court to hear tobacco jurisdiction case
Gabriel Haboubi on January 12, 2007 4:24 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Friday granted certiorari in four cases [order list, PDF], including one that will determine if tobacco companies are protected from judgments in state courts on the grounds that cigarettes are federally regulated. The appeal, Watson v. Philip Morris, Cos. (05-1284) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], was filed by two Arkansas women who found their state court case against Philip Morris [corporate website] for advertising claims of low tar and nicotine in light cigarettes, being removed to federal jurisdiction. Philip Morris argued that the unprecedented, detailed, and direct control exerted by the Federal Trade Commission [official website] over cigarette advertising made the company a person acting under a federal officer, and convinced [opinion, PDF] the US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] that removal on those grounds were justified. AP has more.
In Hinck v. US (06-376) [docket; question presented, PDF], the court will determine the scope of jurisdiction held by the US Tax Court [official website]. In Struhs, et al., v. Wyner (06-531) [docket; question presented, PDF], the justices will examine in what situations attorney fees may be awarded to a victorious party. Finally, the court in Uttecht v. Brown (06-413) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] will examine whether federal courts can overturn a state court decision to remove a juror based on their views on capital punishment. SCOTUSblog has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

German high court refuses to hear Motassadeq appeal
Gabriel Haboubi on January 12, 2007 4:09 PM ET

[JURIST] Germanys highest court, the Federal Constitutional Court [official website, in German] in Karlsruhe, announced Friday that it will not hear the appeal [JURIST report] of the 15-year sentence [JURIST report] of convicted September 11 [JURIST news archive] conspirator Mounir al-Motassadeq [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Moroccan-born Motassadeq has another appeal to German appellate courts filed, but it is unknown when it will be considered. Lawyers for Motassadeq have also said they may take the case to the European Court of Justice [official website].
Motassadeq admitted to attending an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan and being friends with some of the Sept. 11 hijackers, but denies knowledge of the attack. The court found Motassadeq guilty because he knew his accomplices planned to hijack planes, even if he remained ignorant as to the details of the attacks. The court also found that Motassadeq aided the hijackers by funneling money and helping them maintain appearances of being university students. Motassadeq's defense team hoped to force a new trial with witnesses previously prevented from testifying by the United States government. Motassadeq's first conviction was overturned [JURIST report] in 2004, in part due to concerns over access to witnesses, but on retrial American officials refused to allow terror suspects in US custody to testify in court [JURIST report], instead agreeing only to provide summaries of its interrogations of prisoners. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Private investigator in HP spying scandal pleads guilty to federal charges
Michael Sung on January 12, 2007 3:47 PM ET

[JURIST] Bryan Wagner, the private investigator involved in the Hewlett-Packard corporate spying scandal [JURIST news archive] pleaded guilty Friday to federal charges [criminal information, PDF] of conspiracy and aggravated identity theft. Wagner was accused of using used the social security number of a targeted reporter to obtain the reporter's telephone records, which Wagner provided to other co-conspirators. The charges carry a possible five-year sentence for conspiracy and a mandatory minimum of two years imprisonment for the aggravated identity theft charge. Under Wagner's plea agreement, he will cooperate with prosecutors in future investigations in exchange for a lighter sentence.
In November, Wagner pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to state charges of using false or fraudulent pretenses to obtain confidential information from a public utility, unauthorized access to computer data, identity theft, and conspiracy to commit those crimes stemming from his role in the corporate spying scandal. The scandal prompted Congress to pass anti-pretexting legislation in 2006, criminalizing obtaining phone records through fraud or lying. The San Francisco Chronicle has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rights report urges EU to fill leadership void left by US
Jeannie Shawl on January 12, 2007 2:45 PM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] has urged the European Union to "fill the leadership void on human rights" [press release] left after allegations of torture and US detention practices have undermined American credibility in the human rights arena. In the introduction [text] to HRW's World Report 2007 [HRW index], released Thursday, HRW Executive Director Kenneth Roth wrote: In the past, many would have looked to the United States to take the lead in addressing these challenges. Though never a consistent promoter of human rights, Washington has been a prominent and influential one. Yet its voice now rings hollowan enormous loss for the human rights cause. Quite apart from the fallout of its ill-fated Iraq invasion, its credibility as a proponent of human rights has been tarnished by the abuses it practices in the name of fighting terrorism. Few US ambassadors dare to protest another governments harsh interrogations, detention without trial, or even "disappearances," knowing how easily an interlocutor could turn the tables and cite US misconduct as an excuse for his government's own abuses. The cheapness of that excuse does not diminish its embarrassing effectiveness. Nor can consolation be taken in the fact that the United States is far from the worlds worst rights violator. The abuses it has committed have done damage enough.
The last year dispelled any doubt that the Bush administration's use of torture and other mistreatment was a matter of policy dictated at the top rather than the aberrant misconduct of a few low-level interrogators. ...
With the United States having largely disqualified itself from human rights promotion, China and Russia effectively undermining the effort, and the global South not yet bearing its share of the burden, it is imperative that the European Union rise to the occasion and assume a leadership role. After all, the EU is the world's leading collection of democracies, founded on a commitment to human rights and the rule of law. Yet the sad truth is that the EU is nowhere near picking up the leadership mantle. All too often, when the EU musters a statement about a human rights problem, it is delivered by a Brussels bureaucrat or takes the form of a written EU Presidency press release rather than a forceful public pronouncement by a head of state or foreign minister. Such statements are rarely followed by firm action or pressure to protect human rights. Due in part to structural problems and in part to a lack of political will, the EU's underperformance on human rights has left a gaping leadership hole. The Washington Post has more.
HRW's 556-page report also decried rights setbacks in Asia [AFP report] in 2006, particularly in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, and accused both Israel and Hezbollah of violating the laws of war [AFP report] during the conflict in the Middle East [JURIST news archive] last summer. HRW also expressed concern at the erosion of human rights and the independence of the judiciary in Venezuela [AP report] under the leadership of President Hugo Chavez.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US to ease entry bars on some foreigners giving 'material support' to armed groups
Katerina Ossenova on January 12, 2007 12:46 PM ET

[JURIST] The Bush Administration said Thursday it will propose legislation easing some anti-terrorism restrictions in order to allow foreigners who have helped armed groups not considered terrorists to seek asylum or resettle in the United States. As a result of antiterrorism laws such as the Patriot Act [PDF; JURIST news archive] and the Real ID Act [PDF text] put in place after the Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive], asylum and refugee status was denied to anyone who belongs to or has provided material support [Refugee Council backgrounder] to armed rebel groups, even if that support was coerced or the armed rebel groups were backed by the US. Human rights groups have slammed existing material support policy as being, in the words [statement] of Human Rights First, "so broad that it ends up affecting refugees who do not support terrorism, and even refugees who are actually the victims of violent groups like Colombian refugees who have been forced to pay money to armed militants." Soon after Thanksgiving last year, HRF appealed [PDF letter; HRF report, PDF] to President Bush to reconsider the policy. Paul Rosenzweig, acting assistant secretary for international affairs at the Department of Homeland Security [official website], expects the administration to present new legislation to Congress by the end of the month.
The new legislation would allow for the resettlement of refugees fleeing from Myanmar [FCNL backgrounder], formerly known as Burma, refugees from Vietnam, Laos, and Tibet, and dozens of Cubans who supported armed groups opposed to Fidel Castro in the 1960s. The 5,600 people whose asylum claims have been on hold or who have been admitted as refugees but denied permanent resident status will also receive resolutions in their cases. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Texas judge stays implementation of Dallas area anti-illegal immigration laws
Brett Murphy on January 12, 2007 10:30 AM ET

[JURIST] Texas District Judge Bruce Priddy granted a 14-day temporary restraining order on Thursday preventing anti-illegal immigrant measures from going into effect as scheduled on Friday in Farmers Branch, Texas. The ordinances, passed last month in the Dallas suburb [JURIST report; Dallas Morning News report], were challenged by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund and the American Civil Liberties Union. Priddy will hold a hearing on Jan. 22 on whether to issue a temporary injunction in the case.
Last month, three Texas landlords filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] challenging the constitutionality of measures. The local anti-illegal immigration laws, the strongest yet passed in Texas, include making English the city's official language [Res. No. 2006-130 text], requiring apartment renters to show proof of residency [Ordinance No. 2892 text], and giving police the power to screen the residency status of suspects in custody. Landlords who rent to illegal immigrants would be subject to a $500 fine for each day they violate the law by renting to individuals without proper documentation. Activists have petitioned against the ordinance [AP report] in an effort to put it to a referendum. An estimated 37 percent of Farmers Branch's population of 28,000 is Hispanic. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|