 |
|

Legal news from Friday, December 15, 2006 |
 |
|


ICC prosecutor says Darfur case ready by February
Jeannie Shawl on December 15, 2006 3:18 PM ET

[JURIST] Luis Moreno-Ocampo [official profile], chief prosecutor for the International Criminal Court [official website], told the UN Security Council Thursday that his investigation [ICC materials] into crimes committed in Darfur [JURIST news archive] is almost complete, noting that he is "preparing to submit evidence to the ICC judges no later than February 2007." Moreno-Ocampo submitted a report [PDF text] to the Security Council pursuant to Resolution 1593 [PDF text] and briefed the council on his progress [press release]: ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo informed the United Nations Security Council that he has nearly completed an investigation into some of the worst crimes committed in Darfur. He is preparing to submit evidence to the ICC judges no later than February 2007 and is putting measures in place to protect victims and witnesses.
The evidence in this emerging first case points to specific individuals who appear to bear the greatest responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity including persecution, torture, murder, and rape. ...
The Prosecutor's first case focuses on a series of incidents in 2003 and 2004, when the most serious crimes occurred in large numbers. Perhaps most significant, the evidence reveals the underlying operational system that enabled the commission of these massive crimes.
The evidence comes from a wide range of sources and reflects a thorough, independent, and impartial review of incriminating and exonerating circumstances. Sources include statements from victims as well as Sudanese officials, documents provided by the Government of the Sudan and the National Commission of Inquiry, thousands of documents collected by the International Commission of Inquiry, and materials generated by the Security Council, states, and international organisations. Under the ICC's Rome Statute [PDF text], the ICC can only prosecute individuals for war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity when a state is unwilling or unable to genuinely prosecute.
The Sudanese government provided Moreno-Ocampo with an update on its national investigations in November, reporting that there have been 14 arrests for "violations of international humanitarian law and human rights abuses." Moreno-Ocampo said, however, that these arrests do not render his case inadmissible because he is pursuing charges against different individuals. AP has more. The UN News Service has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Alabama jury finds Merck not liable in latest Vioxx trial
Lisl Brunner on December 15, 2006 2:48 PM ET

[JURIST] An Alabama jury returned a verdict in favor of pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. [corporate website] on Friday, concluding that the drug Vioxx [JURIST news archive] did not cause the plaintiff in the case to suffer a heart attack. The jury also found that Merck did not withhold information prior to removing the drug from the market in 2004. The plaintiff, Gary Albright, 57, had asked for over $5 million in damages for the heart attack that he suffered in 2001. Evidence was introduced that other pre-existing conditions may have led to Albright's heart attack. Albright has not announced whether he will appeal the verdict.
The Alabama verdict marks Merck's fourth state victory; it has lost three other state suits, and a New Jersey verdict in its favor was vacated [JURIST report] in August. On Wednesday, Merck won its fourth federal victory when a jury in New Orleans found it not liable [JURIST report] for damages related to Vioxx. While Merck lost a federal trial in August, the judge rejected the $50 million verdict [JURIST report] as excessive and ordered a new trial for damages. Merck continues to face thousands of individual lawsuits and hundreds of class actions over the drug, which was pulled from the market after a study showed that it could double the risk of heart attack or stroke if taken for more than 18 months. Last month, a federal judge rejected a bid to combine all federal lawsuits [JURIST report] against Merck into a single class action. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Spain parliament debates bill to compensate Franco victims
Jeannie Shawl on December 15, 2006 10:12 AM ET

[JURIST] The Spanish parliament began debating the proposed Law for the Recovery of the Historical Memory [JURIST report] Thursday, legislation aimed at healing the wounds of Gen. Francisco Franco's authoritarian regime [BBC backgrounder; LOC backgrounder] that ruled Spain from 1939 to 1975 following a bitter three-year civil war. The bill would set aside $25 million to compensate victims of the Franco era for land seizure and personal harm. Victims or the relatives of those killed, exiled, or imprisoned by Franco would have a year to make claims. The bill would also ban public recognition of the Franco era, call on localities to assist relatives of victims to exhume corpses from mass graves to family plots, and order Spanish archives to be consolidated and reorganized so that families can access information from the Franco era.
The government first unveiled the proposal last July, but several amendments to the bill have already been proposed, including a provision that would throw out all trial verdicts from the Franco era. Other critics, including the opposition Popular Party, have called for the bill to be thrown out completely. Final approval of the bill is not expected for several months. AP has more. El Pais has local coverage, in Spanish.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Dutch minister stripped of immigration duties after refusing to halt deportations
Jeannie Shawl on December 15, 2006 8:57 AM ET

[JURIST] The Dutch Parliament [official website] voted Thursday to strip Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk [official website] of responsibility for setting immigration policy and to temporarily halt the deportation of failed asylum seekers. Verdonk, known domestically as the "Iron Lady" for her tough anti-immigration initiatives, will now be responsible for integration and child protection. Verdonk was stripped of her immigration portfolio after parliament passed an amnesty for illegal immigrants who have lived in the Netherlands for more than five years. Verdonk refused to implement the amnesty [BBC report], saying that she would "uphold the immigration law." The Dutch Parliament then passed a motion censuring Verdonk [BBC report], which ordinarily would have prompted her resignation, but several members of the caretaker government threatened to resign from the governing coalition if Verdonk were forced to resign.
Last month, Verdonk announced plans to introduce legislation [press statement, in Dutch] to ban the Muslim full-length burqa [Wikipedia backgrounder] veil as well as other face coverings like ski masks in public places. Dutch law already prohibits wearing burqas and other religious dress [JURIST news archive] that covers the entire body in public schools and on public transportation, but Verdonk said that a total ban was a necessary anti-terror security measure. The Netherlands has traditionally been distinguished by its openness, but in recent years it has become much wary of immigrants, setting up detention centers for asylum-seekers, requiring newcomers to learn Dutch, and adopting a more vigorous deportation policy. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|