Appeals of Chinese dissidents rejected Lisl Brunner at 10:34 AM ET
[JURIST] In two separate rulings on Friday, Chinese courts rejected the appeals of a journalist and rights activist who challenged the government. In a five-minute session, the Beijing High Court rejected an appeal by Zhao Yan [JURIST news archive], a New York Times researcher who was sentenced to three years in prison [JURIST report] for fraud in August. Zhao was acquitted of more serious charges of revealing state secrets at that time. Last week, the same court rejected another appeal [JURIST report] from a reporter who was arrested for spying and revealing state secrets.
Also Friday, the Yinan County Court in Shandong province upheld the sentence of Chen Guangcheng [HRW case backgrounder], a blind human rights activist who wrote about forced abortions in the Chinese countryside. No witnesses or evidence were presented during the thirty-minute trial. Separate charges [JURIST report] of organizing a public disturbance and damaging property are also pending against Chen in a lower court. Chen claims the charges are retribution for his documentation of forced sterilizations and abortions [TIME feature] performed by Chinese officials to enforce China's one-child policy. A Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] spokesperson told AP that "the decisisions . . . have very little to do with justice and have everything to do with politics." AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.