 |
|

Legal news from Monday, November 20, 2006 |
 |
|


Nepal rights commission report holds King responsible for protest violence
Melissa Bancroft on November 20, 2006 8:46 PM ET

[JURIST] Nepal's High Level Probe Commission [JURIST report] submitted its final report Monday to the Nepalese government, concluding that King Gyanendra [official profile; BBC profile] and some 200 members of his administration were responsible for the violent response to the democracy protests [JURIST news archive] last April that left 22 dead and more than 5,000 wounded. The commission, formed [JURIST report] by the interim government in Nepal [JURIST news archive] and led by a former supreme court justice, has the authority to interrogate officials, issue warrants, and make recommendations regarding actions which should be taken against rights abusers. The commission's final report does not include recommendations, but Nepalese Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala has promised to "fully implement" the report [NepalNews.com report]. The commission, whose findings were leaked to the media [JURIST report] last week, reasoned that because Gyanendra chaired Nepal's council of ministers, he was legally responsible for the actions of the cabinet. Rights activists are calling for those responsible for the violent crackdown to be prosecuted; Gyanendra has been stripped of most of his powers [JURIST report] since his fall from power in April, including his right to immunity.
Rights groups have also urged Koirala to make the report available to the public [NepalNews.com report], asserting that the government's failure to release the report publicly violates a right to information and also runs contrary to the spirit behind the pro-democracy movement. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China admits torture behind recent wrongful convictions
Melissa Bancroft on November 20, 2006 7:58 PM ET

[JURIST] China's deputy chief prosecutor has said that almost every wrongful conviction in the country in recent years has been the result of torture [JURIST report] and intensive interrogation techniques. The government has discovered at least 30 people who were wrongfully convicted using confessions extracted by torture, and even estimates the number could be higher. Wang Zhenchuan said that China will now make an effort to record all interrogations [JURIST report] in connection with major crimes on video and audio tape.
China's notorious criminal justice system has been under increased international scrutiny since Manfred Nowak [official profile, [DOC]], UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, found after an investigation [JURIST report] last year that prisoner torture in the country was still widespread [JURIST report] and uncovered evidence of common torture methods such as submersion in pits of sewage or water, cigarette burns, electric shock batons, beatings to the point of exhaustion, and exposure to extreme conditions of heat or cold. The Chinese government initially refuted the accusations [JURIST report], claiming torture was banned in China and that Nowak's findings, based on evidence that suspects were routinely beaten by police, "lacks an objective foundation and does not accord with reality." Torture is most commonly used in the countryside and against those convicted of political crimes. AFP has more. Xinhua has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge rejects Guantanamo detainee transfer bid for heart operation
Jonathan Rhein on November 20, 2006 7:08 PM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Paul L. Friedman [official profile] Monday rejected [official order, PDF] a Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee's petition to have his heart operation transferred to a civilian facility. Saifullah Paracha [advocacy website; Wikipedia profile], a multimillionaire businessman and television producer from Pakistan, petitioned the US District Court for District of Columbia on November 15 to enjoin the US military [JURIST report] from performing a cardiac catheterization [AHA backgrounder] at Guantanamo Bay, claiming the facility lacks sufficient medical equipment and the backup to ensure his health if something goes wrong. Paracha lawyer Gaillard Hunt argued that his client, who has previously suffered two heart attacks, should be transferred to a medical facility in the US or Pakistan. Hunt's claims that Paracha's hands and feet would be shackled during his hospital stay were unconfirmed by government lawyers. US officials, however, asserted that Guantanamo facilities and doctors are adequately prepared to handle the procedure and noted that special equipment and practitioners can be brought in if needed.
In rejecting Parachas motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, Friedman opined that the "petitioner has not established that he faces irreparable injury from having the procedure performed at Guantanamo Bay." The US government also noted that an identical procedure was successfully completed in 2003 and that it is Paracha's choice whether to have the operation. US authorities captured Paracha in 2003 on his way to Thailand, where he was detained until October 2004 when he was moved to Guantanamo. AFP has more. The International Herald Tribune has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bolivia governors confront president on constitutional assembly vote
Joe Shaulis on November 20, 2006 1:15 PM ET

[JURIST] The governors of six of Bolivia's nine states vowed over the weekend to break off relations with President Evo Morales [official website; BBC profile] following a move to give Morales' leftist party more power [JURIST report] to rewrite the country's constitution. The six governors, who all belong to opposition parties but represent 80 percent of Bolivia's population, pledged not to participate in Morales' attempts "to change the structure of government, undermine the law and destabilize elected authorities." They also called on activists to demonstrate Thursday in Cochabama, Bolivia's third-largest city.
On Friday, Bolivia's constitutional assembly [official website, in Spanish] approved a motion to make decisions by majority vote - a victory for Morales' Movement Toward Socialism party (MAS) [party website], which failed to receive two-thirds of the assembly seats [JURIST report] in July's elections. The vote allows MAS, with 137 of the 235 assembly seats, to easily adopt populist reforms into the amended constitution [current text], although a two-thirds vote will still be needed to approve the final constitutional draft. MercoPress News Agency has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ohio GOP fundraiser sentenced to 18 years on fraud conviction
Jaime Jansen on November 20, 2006 1:12 PM ET

[JURIST] Tom Noe [Wikipedia profile], a former Republican fundraiser and prominent coin dealer in Ohio, was sentenced on Monday to 18 years in prison after his conviction [summary, PDF] last week on theft, corrupt activity, money laundering, forgery and tampering with records charges in a rare coin investment scandal [Toledo Blade backgrounder]. Noe managed a $50 million state investment in rare coins promulgated by the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation [official website], and prosecutors alleged that Noe use some of the investment money to pay off his own business loans and purchase a Florida residence. Lucas County Common Pleas Judge Thomas Osowik concluded that Noe spent the state money at an "alarmingly large rate" culminating in an "elaborate scheme of theft."
Noe was indicted [PDF; Columbus Dispatchreport ] in February along with his business partner, Timothy LaPointe. In addition to the coin investment scandal that came to light last year, Noe's actions led to ethics charges [JURIST report] against Republican Ohio Governor Bob Taft [official website], including criminal misdemeanors for failing to acknowledge nearly 70 golf outings and other favors. Taft pleaded no contest [JURIST report] and may face more disciplinary charges [JURIST report]. Noe already received a two-year prison sentence earlier this year after he pleaded guilty to fraudulently contributing $45,000 into President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign. AP has more. The Toledo Blade has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Nicaragua president signs unqualified abortion ban into law
Joshua Pantesco on November 20, 2006 8:53 AM ET

[JURIST] Nicaraguan President Enrique Bolanos [official website, in Spanish] has signed a law that bans all abortion [JURIST report] and eliminates a longstanding exception for the health of the mother. Abortion has long been illegal in Nicaragua, though tempered by the medical necessity exception. Opponents of the complete abortion ban had hoped that Bolanos would reject the bill because it did not raise criminal penalties for women from six years in prison to the thirty years he had previously sought. Nicaragua now joins Chile, El Salvador, and at least 32 other countries in the world which have adopted similar measures.
Nicaragua [US State Dept. backgrounder] has a large Roman Catholic population and the church assisted in drafting the bill, which has been criticized by international human rights groups, including the Center for Reproductive Rights [advocacy website] and Ipas [advocacy website], which claim the number of illegal abortions in the country will increase. Medical practitioners in Nicaragua have been split on the issue, with some arguing that medical science has progressed to the point where a woman's life will not be harmed if the fetus is brought to term, while others claim the new law will discourage doctors from performing life-saving procedures if they become necessary for the mother. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Romney may ask court to put same-sex marriage question on Massachusetts ballot
Joshua Pantesco on November 20, 2006 8:16 AM ET

[JURIST] Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney [official website] on Sunday urged state legislators [DOC speech transcript] to vote on a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage ban and said he will petition the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to place the question on the next ballot if legislators fail to vote on the issue before the end of their term on January 2. Earlier this month, legislators postponed [JURIST report] a vote on the proposed constitutional amendment [DOC text] to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. The state assembly must approve the amendment before it can be presented to voters for final approval. Although opponents of same-sex marriage had obtained 170,000 signatures in favor of putting the measure before the legislature, they lacked the requisite support of one-quarter of the lawmakers to approve a vote on the issue. In his speech Sunday, Romney said: Last week, 109 legislators decided to reject the law, abandon the Constitution, and violate their oath of office. For the Constitution plainly states that when a qualified petition is placed before them, the legislature "shall" vote. It does not say may vote, or vote if its procedures permit a vote, or vote if there are enough of the members in attendance. It says "shall" vote. A decision not to vote is a decision to usurp the Constitution, to abandon democracy and substitute a form of what this nation's founders called tyranny, that is, the imposition of the will of those in power, on the people.
As I listened to the debate in the legislative session last week, I was struck by the irony, and the hypocrisy. Legislators so energized to protect the newly discovered gay right to marry had no compunction about trammeling the long established, constitutional right of the people to vote. The issue now before us is not whether same sex couples should marry. The issue before us today is whether 109 legislators will follow the Constitution. Tomorrow, I will send these 109 a copy of the Constitution and of their oath of office. And this week, we will file an action before the courts, calling upon the judiciary to protect the constitutional rights of our citizens. Let us not see this state, which first established constitutional democracy, become the first to abandon it. Massachusetts [JURIST news archive] is currently the only US state to recognize same-sex marriage, after a November 2003 state high court ruling [JURIST report, background materials]. More than 8,000 couples have subsequently wed in the state, and the precedent has sparked a nationwide debate over gay marriage.
Earlier this month, Arizona voters rejected a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages [JURIST report], civil unions and domestic partnerships. At the same time, voters in seven other states - Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin - approved ballot measures supporting traditional marriage. Last month, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] that same-sex couples must be afforded the same rights as heterosexual couples and gave the legislature 180 days to vote on whether to amend the state's marriage laws. Several similar cases have been decided or are pending in other states including California, Washington, Tennessee, Nebraska, and Connecticut [JURIST reports]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam Dujail trial 'fundamentally unfair': HRW
Joshua Pantesco on November 20, 2006 7:23 AM ET

[JURIST] Saddam Hussein's trial for crimes against humanity committed in Dujail was "fundamentally unfair" and the guilty verdict lacks legitimacy due to procedural and substantive flaws, according to a report [text; press release] released by advocacy group Human Rights Watch on Monday. Nehal Bhuta, the report's author, said that the Iraqi High Tribunal "squandered an important opportunity to deliver credible justice" and called the court's decision to impose the death penalty in light of the trial's procedural shortcomings "indefensible." Based on 10 months of court observation and interviews with judges and lawyers, the report concludes that: - Hussein and his co-defendants were not given adequate notice of charges against them, or enough time to prepare a defense;
- prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory statements, and failed to disclose witness statements and other evidence in advance of trial;
- chain of custody issues were dismissed without argument;
- 29 witness statements were read into the court record, denying Hussein his right to confront his accusers;
- judges failed to explain their reasoning on key issues in writing;
- Hussein's defense counsel acted inappropriately and failed to adequately represent Hussein;
- the turnover of judges hurt the trial, and that the presiding judge exhibited unseemly bias in favor of the prosecution;
- and that substantively, the judges should have required "linkage evidence" from political, historical, or military experts to demonstrate how much knowledge Hussein should have had of the acts he was blamed for.
Hussein's defense lawyers welcomed the report [AFP report] Monday, saying that HRW's findings "bolster" the defense team's arguments that the trial was "unfair and illegal."
Last week, defense lawyers accused Iraqi officials of interfering with the appeals process [JURIST report] of the Dujail verdict, where Hussein and two co-defendants received the death penalty [JURIST report] for crimes against humanity [charging instrument, PDF] committed in Dujail. Hussein was charged [JURIST report] with killing, torturing and illegally detaining Dujail residents, including the execution of 148 Shiites [JURIST report], after an unsuccessful attempt on his life there in 1982.
Hussein is also currently on trial on genocide charges [JURIST news archive] for allegedly killing 100,000 Kurds in the "Anfal" campaigns [HRW backgrounder] in the late 1980s. That trial was adjourned [JURIST report] last week until mid-December. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|