 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, November 18, 2006 |
 |
|


Ethiopians demonstrate against US female circumcision conviction
Ryan Olden on November 18, 2006 3:30 PM ET

[JURIST] About 300 protesters demonstrated Saturday in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia [JURIST news archive], calling for a US retrial of Khalid Adem, a Ethiopian immigrant to the United States who earlier this month was convicted of circumcising his daughter [JURIST report] in 2001. In what was believed to be the first US case of its kind, a Georgia state court [Gwinnett County courts website] sentenced Adem to ten years in prison for sexually mutilating his then-two-year-old daughter with a pair of scissors. The Georgia General Assembly [official website] enacted a bill [text] to specifically criminalize the practice of female genital mutilation [World Health Organization backgrounder] in 2005, as the practice was not technically a crime in Georgia [JURIST news archive] at the time of the incident.
Female circumcision is performed in various cultures and religions to discourage promiscuity among women and denies women sexual pleasure, causes dangerous infections, creates deep emotional scars, and can even kill, according to opponents and human rights groups. The procedure is not specifically illegal in Ethiopia [US State Dept. backgrounder], but government policy there discourages "harmful traditional practices." Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chertoff says international law being used as 'rhetorical weapon' against US
Bernard Hibbitts on November 18, 2006 11:22 AM ET

[JURIST] US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff [official profile] warned [recorded audio] the national convention of the conservative Federalist Society [advocacy website] in a speech [transcript] Friday that international law was increasingly being used as a "rhetorical weapon" against the United States and urged members of his audience to "confront...the rise of an increasingly activist, left-wing, and even elitist philosophy of law that is flourishing not in the United States but in foreign courts and in various international courts and bodies."
Chertoff said that objections from privacy advocates, especially in the European Parliament, to proposed American uses of passenger record data [JURIST report] on air travelers coming from Europe to the US had lately prompted him to realize "how much of my ability to do my job in leading a department that protects the American people depends upon constraints that others want to put upon us based on their conception of either international law or transnational law." Citing rulings by the International Court of Justice against the US in 1986 (Nicaragua v. United States) and 1998 (Breard v. Gilmore) and a 2004 advisory ruling against Israel regarding its "security fence", he expressed general concern about what he described as "an increasing tendency to look to rather generally described and often ambiguous "universal norms" to trump domestic prerogatives that are very much at the core of what it means to live up to your responsibility as a sovereign state": So what we see here is a vision of international law that if taken aggressively would literally strike at the heart of some of our basic fundamental principles: separation of power, respect for the Senate's ability to ratify treaties, and the Senate's ability to reject treaties, and respect for federalism and the importance of letting the state courts set their own rules to govern what they do....
[T]he fact is whether we like it not, international law is increasingly entering our domestic domain. The Supreme Court has begun to bring it through cases like Hamdan and Alvarez-MacHain, which allowed a very small opening but still an opening in the door under the Alien Tort Claims Act to international human rights law being a source of direct causes of action here in the United States.
Through various European and other kinds of domestic protection rules, they're trying -- there's an increasing effort to control our use of information in our own country to determined who comes in from outside, and, of course, international law is being used as a rhetorical weapon against us. We are constantly portrayed as being on the losing end, and the negative end of international law developments. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bolivia leftist party gains leverage in constitutional assembly
Leslie Schulman on November 18, 2006 10:45 AM ET

[JURIST] The Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) [party website, in Spanish; Wikipedia backgrounder] party of Bolivian President Evo Morales [official website; BBC profile] gained more power to rewrite the country's constitution over the objections of opposing political parties Friday when Bolivia's constitutional assembly [official website, in Spanish] approved a motion to make decisions by majority vote. The measure gives the MAS, which failed to receive [JURIST report] two-thirds of the assembly seats in July's elections, the power to easily adopt populist reforms into the amended constitution [current text], although a two-thirds vote will still be needed to approve the final constitutional draft. The MAS holds 137 of 235 assembly seats. Podemos, the main opposition party, represents wealthy landowners and supports greater state autonomy. AP has more. La Patria has local coverage in Spanish.
Morales, elected last year [JURIST report] following weeks of protests from leftists demanding constitutional changes, is the first indigenous president to be elected in Bolivia [JURIST news archive], and has been an outspoken advocate for the poor and for policies more favorable to the majority indigenous Indian population [JURIST report]. The constitutional assembly convened [JURIST report] in August and will submit its adopted draft to a nationwide referendum by the end of 2007.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN committee wants 'political' condemnations for rights abuses halted
Caitlin Price on November 18, 2006 10:40 AM ET

[JURIST] The UN General Assembly Third Committee [official website] on Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Affairs has approved a draft resolution [PDF] calling for an end to politically motivated condemnations of countries for human rights violations. The resolution, adopted Thursday, says that human rights protection should be "guided by the principles of universality, non-selectivity, impartiality and objectivity and should be not used for political purposes". The measure was approved by a vote of 77-63 vote and will next be presented to the General Assembly for a final vote.
The resolution was sponsored by Belarus [JURIST news archive; Foreign Ministry press release] and Uzbekistan [JURIST news archive], both of which been accused of extensive human rights violations in the past. China, Cuba, North Korea, Indonesia, Iran, Russia, Sudan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zimbabwe were co-sponsors. The United States along with many European countries oppose the resolution, saying it favors nations that are long-term rights violators. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Dutch government promises burqa ban after election
Bernard Hibbitts on November 18, 2006 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] The Dutch government [official website] announced after a cabinet meeting Friday that it will introduce legislation [press statement, in Dutch] to ban the Muslim full-length burqa [Wikipedia backgrounder] veil as well as other face coverings like ski masks in public places "as soon as possible" after the country votes in a national election scheduled for Wednesday. Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk [official profile] told Dutch media that the legislation would be brought in for security reasons and to promote the integration of Dutch society. She has noted in the past that the government cannot enforce a total ban under current law because of religious freedom statutes. No European country currently imposes a comparable total prohibition on Muslim veils, although headscarves and other religious symbols [JURIST news archive] have been banned in French public schools and German public school teachers are prohibited from wearing them. Dutch Muslim leaders immediately criticized the move as promising an unconstitutional act targeting Muslims, with the leader of Dutch Muslim organization CMO [backgrounder, in Dutch] saying it would be a "big law for a small problem" as he estimated that only some 30 Dutch Muslim women wear burqas.
Verdonk, known domestically as the "Iron Lady" for her tough anti-immigration initiatives, first floated the burqa ban [JURIST report] last year, and a majority of lawmakers endorsed a ban [NOS report] in December. Muslims currently make up about 6 percent of the Dutch population; the country has traditionally been distinguished by its openness, but in recent years it has become much wary of immigrants, setting up detention centers for asylum-seekers, requiring newcomers to learn Dutch, and adopting a more vigorous deportation policy. Tensions rose in 2004 when outspoken Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh [JURIST news archive] was assassinated by a Islamic militant. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|