JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Monday, November 13, 2006

Federal appeals court upholds Ohio abortion counseling provision
Melissa Bancroft at 10:10 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] Monday upheld [PDF text] an Ohio regulation requiring a women to meet with a doctor 24 hours prior to an abortion procedure but reversed a District Court ruling [JURIST report] that had sustained a provision limiting minors to one chance of a judicial waiver from the state's parental notification requirement. The appeals court determined that allowing minors only one attempt during a pregnancy to petition for judicial bypass placed an undue burden on women, violating the due process clause [text] of the US Constitution. Requiring a meeting with a doctor prior to an abortion, however, was not an undue burden even though it could delay abortions up to two weeks. AP has more.

In November 2005 the Indiana Supreme Court upheld [JURIST report] a law requiring women seeking an abortion in Indiana to undergo counseling about medical risks and abortion-alternatives and wait at least 18 hours after the session before obtaining an abortion. In October this year, the US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction [JURIST report] against a 2005 South Dakota law requiring doctors in that state who perform abortions to tell women that abortion ends the lives of "human beings." According to the Guttmacher Institute [advocacy website], a nonprofit group that researches reproductive health issues, more than 30 states now require women to attend "counseling" sessions prior to an abortion procedure.






Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US House votes for 20-week abortion ban
3:57 PM ET, June 19

 UK Supreme Court allows families of Iraq soldiers to sue government
2:28 PM ET, June 19

 AI: China mining companies contributing to Congo rights abuses
12:51 PM ET, June 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org