Senior Abu Ghraib interrogator faces Article 32 hearing

[JURIST] US Army prosecutors argued in a hearing Monday that an officer overseeing interrogations at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] should face a court-martial for his willful blindness toward prisoner abuse, while a defense attorney countered that most of the military police officers who abused prisoners were not under his client's command. Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan [Wikipedia profile; JURIST news archive], former director of the Joint Interrogation Debriefing Center [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], is the highest-ranking officer charged with crimes [JURIST report] at Abu Ghraib, including three counts of dereliction of duty, two counts of making false official statements, two counts of willfully disobeying orders and one count of cruelty and mistreatment [UCMJ text].

Jordan's Article 32 hearing [JAG backgrounder] - the military equivalent of a civilian grand jury proceeding - is expected to last up to six days, with testimony from about 50 witnesses. If court-martialed and convicted on all 12 counts, Jordan could be sentenced to a maximum of 42 years in prison. While 11 soldiers and lower-ranking officers have been convicted in connection abuses at Abu Ghraib, superior officers have so far only received punishments such as reprimands, fines and being relieved of command [JURIST report]. A 2004 Army report [PDF text; JURIST report] recommended that Jordan and his superior officer be punished for their role in the abuse scandal. AP has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.