 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, October 25, 2006 |
 |
|


New Jersey high court rules same-sex couples must be given equal rights
Holly Manges Jones on October 25, 2006 3:35 PM ET

[JURIST] The New Jersey Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday ruled [PDF text] that same-sex couples in the state must be afforded the same rights as heterosexual couples, and said that the state legislature must decide whether New Jersey will recognize same-sex marriage or another form of civil unions. In a case brought by seven same-sex couples who argued that they should be allowed to marry under the New Jersey State Constitution [text], the state supreme court overturned a 2005 New Jersey appellate court ruling [JURIST report] that upheld the state's ban on same-sex marriage. Under Wednesday's ruling, the state legislature has 180 days to amend the state's marriage laws.
Currently, Massachusetts is the only state to allow same-sex marriage [JURIST news archive], which was legalized when the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts [official] ruled [JURIST report] in 2003 that a ban on such marriages was unconstitutional. Several cases similar to the New Jersey case have been decided or are pending in other states including California, Washington, Tennessee, Nebraska, and Connecticut [JURIST reports]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russian Politkovskaya murder probe focuses on former police officers
Brett Murphy on October 25, 2006 3:07 PM ET

[JURIST] Russian officials investigating the October 7 death of reporter Anna Politkovskaya [BBC obituary] are focusing their probe on former police officers who Politkovskaya linked to the killing and torture of Chechen civilians, Russian newspaper Kommersant reported Wednesday. According to the article, investigators followed up on sightings of two former police officers linked to the abuses, including Sergei Lapin, who had been accused in 2001 of threatening Politkovskaya via e-mail, in a Siberian region 1,200 miles east of Moscow called Khanty-Mansiisk. No official comment has yet been released by the Russian Prosecutor General's office [official website, in Russian].
Russian Prosecutor General Yury Chaika took over the investigation [JURIST report] into Politkovskaya's murder shortly after her death. Last week, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso [official website] urged [JURIST report] Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring justice to those responsible for Politkovskaya's death. Shortly after Politkovskaya, President Bush called [JURIST report] for the Russian government "to conduct a vigorous and thorough investigation to bring to justice those responsible." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

California court allows Pledge of Allegiance challenger to sue chaplain for libel
Holly Manges Jones on October 25, 2006 10:55 AM ET

[JURIST] Atheist Michael Newdow [advocacy website; Time profile], the man who sued [OYEZ case backgrounder; JURIST report] to have the words "under God" removed from the Pledge of Allegiance [JURIST news archive], will be able to proceed with a libel lawsuit against a chaplain, according to a ruling [opinion, PDF] Tuesday by the California First District Court of Appeal [official website]. Newdow sued Reverend Austin Miles after Miles used a website to accuse Newdow of perjury while testifying under oath about the emotional effects suffered by his daughter from reciting the Pledge. Miles also said he thought Newdow should be punished for his lies under oath, leading Newdow to sue the chaplain for libel, denying that he made the comments suggested by Miles. Miles argued that his comments were a matter of free speech, but the California appeals court ruled that the "minimal merit" necessary to proceed with a libel suit was present due, in part, to Miles' use of the word "perjury" six times in his Internet post.
Miles has not indicated whether he plans to appeal the decision further. The justices noted that Newdow will have to prove that Miles acted with malice and that there was "substantial and injurious misquotation" in a libel suit against the chaplain. BCN has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Appeals court weighs tougher rules on Gitmo detainee-lawyer communication
Joshua Pantesco on October 25, 2006 9:22 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] is currently reviewing proposed rule changes that would place further restrictions on attorney contact with detainees now held at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. The rules, submitted in government court filings for use in the case against Haji Bismullah, are intended to prevent defense attorneys from passing along allegedly inflammatory materials to their clients, such as news clippings about terrorist attacks and detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. Specifically, the rules would decrease client contact from unlimited visits to four visits. Mail inspectors, who are currently permitted to search legal mail for actual contraband only, would be authorized to search for unnecessary and provocatory current event information. Now, lawyers must receive security clearance to view classified case information, while under the proposed rules, the lawyer would be forced to submit to a government determination that the lawyer "needs to know" the information sought. Also, the proposed rules would give the military the power to determine which topics and information lawyers and their clients are allowed to discuss, while under the current rules, the military must petition a judge to declare certain topics and information unmentionable. In the US Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [Duke case law backgrounder; opinion text], then-Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote that Hamdi, a foreign-born detainee, "unquestionably has the right to access to counsel."
If the court accepts the rules in the Bismullah case, it is expected that they would apply to all detainees. Bismullah, once an Afghan transportation official, is among the first detainees to appeal their enemy combatant designation. The Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Gonzales 'disappointed' by view that US not backing rule of law
Joshua Pantesco on October 25, 2006 8:02 AM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile; JURIST news archive] told reporters in Spain Tuesday that the perception that the US does not support the rule of law is "disappointing." Gonzales acknowledged that the international reputation of the US has been injured by several ongoing news stories, including the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal, allegations of US rendition flights, and secret prisons in Europe [JURIST news archives]. Gonzales further said the solution may be to better explain the war on terror to Europe and the rest of the free world.
Gonzales also stressed that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) [text], signed into law [JURIST report] earlier this month, will ensure fair trials for terror suspects. In a separate speech [transcript] Monday, Gonzales explained [transcript] that the MCA approves military tribunals that incorporate those "procedural protections that we regard as fundamental," including "the presumption of innocence unless proven guilty by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt," a trial before an impartial military judge, and representation by a JAG Corps officer. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iran president balks at fingerprinting bill aimed at US visitors
Joshua Pantesco on October 25, 2006 7:37 AM ET

[JURIST] Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [official profile; BBC profile] has said that he opposes a bill, passed during a preliminary reading in the Iran parliament earlier this month, that would require every American visitor in Iran to be fingerprinted upon entry. Ahmadinejad said Monday that Americans are welcome in Iran [JURIST news archive], and that Iran only opposes US policy, not US citizens. The bill was proposed as a reaction to US regulations, implemented in 2002, requiring every Iranian to be fingerprinted upon arrival in the US. Currently, only Canadians are exempt from the US-VISIT program [official backgrounder], which requires that all visitors provide fingerprints and photographs that are kept in a lifetime travel dossiers.
Earlier in October, Iran announced strong opposition to the Iran Freedom Support Act [HR 6198 text, PDF], a bill signed into law [JURIST report] by President Bush that authorizes US sanctions against foreign governments that provide support for Iran's nuclear program or contribute towards the country's armament. Iran also preemptively denounced possible Security Council sanctions [JURIST report] that have been threatened for failing to cease uranium enrichment past a August 31 deadline imposed by Security Council Resolution 1696 [PDF text, JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|