 |
|

Legal news from Monday, October 23, 2006 |
 |
|


Indonesia releasing two Bali bombings convicts to mark Muslim holiday
Melissa Bancroft on October 23, 2006 7:26 PM ET

[JURIST] Indonesia [JURIST news archive] will release two prisoners convicted of the 2002 bombings that killed over 200 people at a Bali nightclub [BBC report], prison officials said Monday. The convicts will be freed Tuesday to mark the Muslim holiday of Eid ul-Fitr [BBC backgrounder], the end of Ramadan [BBC backgrounder]. Indonesia has a prisoner remission program for various holidays including August 17, marking the country's independence from Dutch colonial rule, and religious holidays, such as Christmas and Eid ul-Fitr. The Indonesian remission program has been strongly criticized by foreign governments for years, including countries such as Australia whose citizens have been victims of Indonesian terrorists. In August, there was consternation in Australia [Melbourne Age report] when another prisoner sentenced in connection with the 2002 attacks walked free after having his sentence celebratorily cut by three months. In response to these complaints, the Indonesian government recently passed a regulation which toughens the standards for remission of prison sentences [Xinhua report] for "serious" crimes, such as drug trafficking and terrorism.
Sirojul Munir was convicted of harboring two of the bombing masterminds. Details surrounding the second inmate, Mudjarot, and his conviction are not available. Both men were scheduled to be released from prison in less than two months. Three of the prisoners connected with the bombings are on death row and have recently been granted a stay of execution [JURIST report] while they await a final appeal. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Gonzales takes defense of Military Commissions Act to JAG conference
Joe Shaulis on October 23, 2006 5:15 PM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile; JURIST news archive] defended the new Military Commissions Act of 2006 [PDF text; summary] Monday before an audience of senior military lawyers, insisting it gives enemy combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] "greater legal rights than are provided to lawful prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions." In a speech [prepared text] to the Judge Advocate General Corps leadership [official profiles] at the Keystone Leadership Summit [conference website] in Florida, Gonzales said [t]he new law, consistent with history, makes clear that alien enemy combatants may not file habeas corpus petitions in the civilian courts. Yet the United States provides every detainee at Guantanamo Bay the opportunity to challenge his detention not merely before a military tribunal, but also with an unprecedented appeal to our own domestic courts.
The Act also contains important provisions to reinforce our compliance with the Geneva Conventions, and to clarify for U.S. personnel their international obligations. For instance, interrogations of prisoners have proven to be among the most vital sources of intelligence in the War on Terror, and they have saved the lives of innocent civilians in the United States and around the world. These interrogations employ tough techniques, but the techniques are safe, consistent with our values, and have been carefully reviewed to ensure compliance with the law.
The Act buttresses the President's authority under our Constitution to interpret the meaning and applicability of the Geneva Conventions for the United States. It empowers the President to provide our personnel, and particularly our interrogators, with clear and authoritative guidelines for what they must do to comply with the Geneva Conventions. Gonzales said military commissions [JURIST news archive] ensure that suspects will receive a "full and fair trial[s]" because they incorporate "fundamental" procedural safeguards such impartial military judges, JAG Corps defense counsel and a presumption of innocence unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He explained that MCA procedures depart from those for courts-martial and civilian trials in some respects, such as the admissibility of reliable hearsay evidence, only because of "wartime circumstances": [M]any witnesses before the commissions are likely to be foreign nationals not amenable to process, and others may be unavailable because of military necessity, injury, or death. And the United States military cannot be expected to leave the battlefield to gather evidence like police officers in the course of fighting the enemy. The MCA has drawn harsh criticism from rights groups and many legal experts since President Bush signed it into law [JURIST reports] on October 17. Gonzales' remarks to the JAG Corps leaders echo others [JURIST report] he made last week in an online White House forum. The Washington Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Skilling sentenced to 24 years prison in Enron fraud case
Joshua Pantesco on October 23, 2006 5:02 PM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Sim Lake on Monday sentenced former Enron [corporate website; JURIST news archive] CEO Jeffrey Skilling [Houston Chronicle profile] to 24 years in prison and determined that $45 million of Skilling's assets will be seized to be distributed to former Enron employees. Skilling, convicted [JURIST report; verdict backgrounder] in May on 19 counts of conspiracy, insider trading, and securities fraud, was charged [final redacted indictment, PDF] with providing investors with false and misleading financial information from 1999 up until Enron filed bankruptcy in late 2001.
The federal government's Enron Task Force estimated that Skilling controls up to $66 million in forfeitable assets, including at least $50 million in securities. Skilling had petitioned Lake to allow him to remain free pending his appeal [Houston Chronicle report] of his conviction, but Lake rejected that request, instead asking the US Bureau of Prisons to recommend when Skilling should begin serving the 292-month sentence. Skilling was ordered to home confinement, and will be subject to electronic surveillance, until the date when he must report to prison.
Last week, Lake vacated the conviction [JURIST report] of co-defendant Kenneth Lay, who was also convicted [JURIST report] in May on conspiracy and fraud charges [indictment, PDF] before he died suddenly [JURIST report] from a heart attack [PDF autopsy report].
The record for the largest white-collar criminal sentence is held by former Worldcom CEO Bernard Ebbers, who received 25 years [JURIST report], affirmed on appeal [JURIST report], for fraud and conspiracy connected to a $11 billion fraud scheme that drove Worldcom into bankruptcy. The Houston Chronicle has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge hears arguments on Hinckley overnight visits
Joe Shaulis on October 23, 2006 3:11 PM ET

[JURIST] A lawyer for John W. Hinckley, Jr. [Wikipedia profile] argued Monday in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] that the man who shot President Ronald Reagan and three others in 1981 [PBS backgrounder] should be allowed more time away from a mental institution. Late last year, US District Judge Paul Friedman [official profile], ruled [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that Hinckley could stay overnight with his parents in Williamsburg, VA, for four days every six weeks with supervision by the Secret Service [official website]. Friedman is considering whether to continue those visits. At Monday's hearing, Assistant US Attorney Thomas Zeno asserted that Hinckley's parents, who are in their 80s, are no longer able to provide adequate supervision, leading Friedman to suggest that Hinckley's siblings may have to replace them as custodians. Hinckley's attorney, Barry Levine, contended that the visits should be not only continued but increased because his client poses "no danger to himself or others."
Hinckley has lived at St. Elizabeths Hospital [hospital website] in Washington since he was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the shootings of Reagan, press secretary James Brady and two law enforcement officers. His doctors have said his psychosis is in remission [USA Today report]. Friedman is expected to decide whether to continue the current visits next month and to consider whether to modify the arrangements next spring. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK racial equality head appeals for honest debate in Muslim veil controversy
Joshua Pantesco on October 23, 2006 7:46 AM ET

[JURIST] Trevor Phillips [official profile], chairman of the UK Commission for Racial Equality [official website], warned Sunday that if communication about social differences does not improve in Britain, riots could erupt there in the wake of a religious dress [JURIST news archive] debate prompted by comments from House of Commons leader Jack Straw [official profile] and the suspension of a Muslim UK teacher for wearing a full-face veil - a niqab [Wikipedia backgrounder] - in the classroom. In an editorial [text] in the Sunday Times, Phillips wrote: There is a danger that increasingly we are so afraid to speak to each other about our differences that nobody can say what they mean and nobody can hear what is meant.
So I welcome the debate. The problem with it so far is that it has been conducted in the wrong place between the wrong people and about the wrong things. I had no concerns about Jack Straw's initial careful expression of concern about the wearing of the veil in his surgery [constituency office]. After all, this was as much a comment about him and his generation as it was about the niqab. It may be that people like Straw have greater difficulty coping with the social gap that not seeing someone's face undoubtedly creates; for the internet generation, who can conduct entire relationships through a computer screen, this may not be quite the same kind of barrier. Either way, it was entirely reasonable for him to express his discomfort.
Straw's comments could have liberated us to say that sometimes we don't like the way others behave, without turning it into an accusation about their faith or race. The so-called Muslim leaders who initially attacked Straw were wrong. They were overly defensive and need to accept that in a diverse society we should be free to make polite requests of this kind....
We must celebrate our differences, but if that is all we do we ignore the feelings of the many millions of every race, faith and culture for whom the frictions of diversity are much more evident than its benefits. No amount of lecturing from comfortable middle-class liberals will brush away the anxiety felt in many of our towns and cities.
If we dont talk about this honestly, we have seen in this country, in Holland, in France and in the United States what happens next. In 1963 the great African-American writer James Baldwin quoted an old spiritual in a famous essay, correctly predicting the civil strife that was to come: God gave Noah the rainbow sign, Said no more water, but the fire next time. The current UK veil controversy was ignited last month when Straw wrote a column [text] for the Lancashire Telegraph saying that he asks Muslim women who visit his constituency office to remove their veils before speaking with him because he "felt uncomfortable about talking to someone "face-to-face" who I could not see." The remarks provoked a firestorm of political controversy which eventually led Prime Minister Tony Blair to describe wearing of the niqab as a mark of separation [BBC report].
Meanwhile, Aishah Azmi [BBC profile], a Muslim teaching assistant suspended by a British school for refusing to remove her niqab, has said she will appeal [JURIST report] the suspension. Azmi was suspended after being told that her pupils were less likely to understand her when she spoke from behind her veil. She sued for racial discrimination and lost, but was awarded £1,100 (about US $2,100) for "injury to her feelings" caused by local education authority's handling of her complaint. AP has more. The Guardian has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|