 |
|

Legal news from Friday, October 20, 2006 |
 |
|


Tunisia presses enforcement of Muslim headscarf ban
Gabriel Haboubi on October 20, 2006 3:56 PM ET

[JURIST] The Tunisian government [official website, in French] has launched a new campaign against the public wearing of hijabs [III&E backgrounder], the headscarves worn by many Muslim women in the predominantly Islamic state north African state. Police have begun stopping Muslim women wearing the hijab on the street, asking them to remove it, and to sign an affidavit promising to never wear it again. A decree from 1981 bans wearing the headscarves in public, and senior government officials of the autocracy characterize the garments as sectarian, worn by people using religion to hide political aims. Tunisian rights activists argue that the government ban is unconstitutional, and that many people are upset by it, but few feel safe to openly challenge the government. In the US, the Council on American-Islamic Relations condemned the Tunisian move [press release] Thursday, saying: The Tunisian law banning Islamic attire in certain areas, and the apparent expanded interpretation of that law, violates international human rights standards set forth by the United Nations and ratified by virtually every nation on earth.... Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a transnational treaty having the weight of international law states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. . .(and) to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance." Tunisia [CIA backgrounder] is 98% Muslim, and takes some aspects of its legal system from Sharia law [Guardian backgrounder; JURIST news archive]; since independence from France in 1956, the government has taken a harsh stance against Islamic fundamentalism, establishing both religious freedoms and a large number of womens rights. Other civil freedoms, such as access to a free press, although officially sanctioned, are lacking. Tunisian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali [official biography, in French] seems open to restricting signs and religious symbols that could enhance outlawed Islamic political opposition. The new intensity in enforcing the headscarf ban comes at a time when many other nations are considering legislation restricting religious dress [JURIST news archive]. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Texas Supreme Court justice wins appeal of admonishment for Miers statements
Alexis Unkovic on October 20, 2006 3:19 PM ET

[JURIST] Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht [official profile] won his appeal of an "admonishment" [JURIST report] he received in May for allegedly improperly using the power of his office to support the nomination of his friend, Harriet Miers [JURIST news archive], to the US Supreme Court. A three-judge panel of the Special Court of Review, appointed by the Texas Supreme Court [official website], issued a ruling [text, PDF] Friday, dismissing the admonishment and determining that Hecht had not violated Texas Code of Judicial Conduct [text]. The justices who considered the appeal were Kerry FitzGerald [DBA profile] and Amos Mazzant [SBT profile] of the Dallas appeals court and Ann McClure [official profile] of the El Paso appeals court. AP has more.
Hecht defended his actions [JURIST report], which included granting about 120 newspaper, radio and television interviews on the Miers nomination, before the appeals panel in August. US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) [JURIST news archive] also testified in support of Hecht during that appeal.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Release of dissident Syrian writer postponed
Gabriel Haboubi on October 20, 2006 2:51 PM ET

[JURIST] The National Organization for Human Rights in Syria [JURIST report] announced Friday that the release of jailed Syrian writer and activist Michel Kilo [JURIST report; BBC report], who was set to be released on bail Thursday, has been delayed due to procedural holdups. Kilo was one of ten activists arrested after signing the so-called Beirut-Damascus Declaration of 12 May [text excerpts], a petition calling for Syria to mend relationships with Lebanon, establish a properly demarcated border, and release political prisoners. Lawyer Ammar al-Qorabi, the president of the human rights [JURIST news archive] organization, told journalists that the decision to release Kilo is enforceable, and should be carried out within the next two days.
Kilo and prominent activist lawyer Anwar Bunni [Amnesty International backgrounder] are the only two of the ten that are still in jail. Bunni, who also signed the declaration, was arrested [JURIST report] soon after publicly criticizing the government for its arrest of Kilo. The US State Department [official website] had nothing but harsh words for Syria [press briefing transcript; JURIST report], calling for the immediate end to the persecution of Syrians who seek to defend their rights and to bring democratic change to their country. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN Nepal rights office urges political groups to respect obligations
Michael Sung on October 20, 2006 2:13 PM ET

[JURIST] The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal (OHCHR-Nepal) [official website] has urged the Seven Party Alliance Government and the Maoist faction in Nepal [JURIST news archive] to adhere to their commitments to protect human rights, saying in a statement Thursday that although there have been efforts to combat impunity those "measures have been far from adequate." The statement follows the October 18 appointment of Lena Sundh [press release], a Swedish diplomat, as head of OHCHR-Nepal.
OHCHR-Nepal, created in accordance to an agreement between OHCHR and the Nepalese government [PDF text] in April 2005, has a mandate to monitor, investigate and verify the situation of human rights in Nepal. The human rights office has criticized fighters [JURIST report] belonging to the Nepali Maoist party [party website; BBC profile] for continued kidnappings, torture, and murder of political and civilian targets. OHCHR-Nepal urged all parties to "translate their written commitments to human rights into effective, long-lasting action" in order to "achieve lasting peace and justice." Opposition political parties, including the Maoists, conducted three weeks of pro-democracy protests [JURIST news archive] in April until King Gyanendra [official profile; BBC profile] agreed to reinstate parliament [JURIST report] and give up direct control of the government. The Maoist party has maintained that it is willing to renounce violence if the monarchy is completely removed from Nepal's constitution. Talks on a new interim constitution [JURIST report] are ongoing, but the Maoists claim the draft leaves the monarchy issue unresolved [JURIST report]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New York high court rules social service groups must offer contraceptive coverage
Stefanie Presley on October 20, 2006 1:24 PM ET

[JURIST] New York's Court of Appeals [official website], the state's highest court, handed down a 6-0 decision [PDF text] Thursday, banning Catholic Charities [organization website] and nine other social service organizations from refusing to provide birth control insurance coverage for their employees. The decision hinged on whether such organizations would be classified as social services agencies or as churches under the Women's Health and Wellness Act of 2002 (WHWA) [text; S 3221]. The Act, spurred by the lobbying efforts of statewide reproductive rights [JURIST news archive] organizations, requires employers to extend preventative health coverage, including mammograms, bone screenings and prescription contraceptives, to their female employees. The law exempts only those employers who are religious in nature, such as churches, mosques and temples.
The court considered the organizations' "interests in adhering to the tenets of their faith" and the "state's substantial interest in fostering equality between the sexes, and in providing women with better health care." The court then noted that, as the social service organizations had hired employees whose faiths differed from those of their own religious affiliations, the court could not allow the employers' underlying religious beliefs to preclude employee access to preventative health care. Catholic Charities has said that it is considering an appeal of the decision to the US Supreme Court and would, under protest, continue to offer prescription contraceptive coverage to its employees. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ tells federal courts they lack jurisdiction over detainee habeas claims
Joe Shaulis on October 20, 2006 1:19 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Justice Department [official website] has issued a notice [PDF text] informing the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] that it no longer has jurisdiction over 196 habeas corpus cases brought by detainees at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. The DOJ notice came one day after President Bush signed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [JURIST report], and followed a similar letter [PDF text] sent to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit [official website] just after Tuesday's bill signing, notifying the court that it lacked jurisdiction in another Guantanamo habeas case. The DOJ urged the appeals court to decide the case on the existing record, but the appeals court has ordered [PDF text] supplemental briefs on the significance of the Military Commissions Act (MCA) [PDF text; summary]. The district court cases affected by Wednesday's notice had been stayed pending the DC Circuit's decision in the Guantanamo case.
The MCA provides in part that no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter. [US Code Title 10, Chapter 47a, s. 950j (b)] The new law has drawn criticism from policymakers and advocacy groups since it was passed by Congress last month [JURIST reports]. Challenges to the law's habeas provision have already been filed in federal court [JURIST report]. Friday's Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australia justice minister denounces US detention of Hicks without trial
Lisl Brunner on October 20, 2006 9:06 AM ET

[JURIST] Australia's justice minister has denounced the five year detention without trial of Australian citizen David Hicks [JURIST news archive, AI archive] in Australia's boldest official statement in several months concerning the Guantanamo prisoner. In a speech in Perth to the International Criminal Lawyers' Conference, Christopher Ellison [official profile] said of the Australian government, "We have made it clear that we do not think that [Hicks' situation] is satisfactory." Australia is keeping in close contact with US officials, Ellison reported, and would consider an agreement to transfer Hicks to an Australian prison. Hicks was interned at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] soon after he was captured for allegedly fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001. While he will likely be tried under the newly-signed [JURIST report] Military Commissions Act [text, PDF], his defense team recently announced their intent to challenge that as unconstitutional [JURIST report].
Although Australian Attorney General Philip Ruddock [official website] announced in August that the government would push for Hicks' return to Australia, Canberra has not made any such statements since that time. Last week the Australian Lawyers Alliance unanimously condemned the conservative administration of Prime Minister John Howard [JURIST report] for its handling of the matter. In a Thursday interview with ABC news [transcript], Ruddock said that he would support a plea bargain between Hicks and the US government, stating, "We want these issues dealt with as quickly as possible." Hicks counsel Michael Mori ruled out the possibility, however. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush asserts US right to protect interests in space
Kate Heneroty on October 20, 2006 8:37 AM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush has authorized the first changes to the US space policy in nearly 10 years by asserting authority to deny access to space to any adversary hostile to US interests. An unclassified version of the new US National Space Policy [text, PDF] is posted on the website of the Office of Science and Technology Policy [official website], but the policy - signed in August - was not publicly announced until highlighted in a Washington Post report Wednesday.
In the document, the US "rejects any claims of sovereignty by any nation," and will "view purposeful interference with its space systems as an infringement on its rights." The White House has said that the policy does not provide for development or deployment of weapons, but the policy itself states that "proposed arms control agreements or restrictions must not impair the rights of the US..." National Security Council [official website] spokesman Frederick Jones has said that although the policy emphasizes protection of space assets, this shouldn't be interpreted to "imply some sort of forceful action." Jones noted that US space capabilities are necessary for a range of things, including "ATMs, personal navigation, package tracking, radio services, and cell phone use." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|