 |
|

Legal news from Monday, October 16, 2006 |
 |
|


Congo military court seeks war crimes trial for foreigners involved in Kilwa incident
Jonathan Rhein on October 16, 2006 7:20 PM ET

[JURIST] A military court in the Democratic Republic of Congo [JURIST backgrounder] has recommended that three ex-employees of Anvil Mining [corporate website], an Australian company, be tried for complicity in war crimes committed by Congolese government soldiers in 2004. The crimes alleged to have been facilitated by the ex-employees, a Canadian and two South Africans, include summary executions, rape, torture, and looting carried out by soldiers led by Colonel Ademar Ilunga in 2004 after the bombardment of the town of Kilwa during a small rebellion in Congo's Katanga province. At least 100 people are said to have died [ABC Australia report; recorded video; timeline].
A court document obtained by Reuters states that the men "voluntarily failed to withdraw the vehicles placed at the disposal of the 62nd Brigade in the context of the counter offensive [on] October 2004 to recapture the town of Kilwa" and "knowingly facilitated the commission of war crimes by Ilunga Ademar and his men." In June 2005, an Australian law firm acting on behalf of Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) [advocacy website] and Congolese NGOs asked the Australian Federal Police [official website] to determine if there was sufficient evidence of Anvil's involvement in crimes against humanity or war crimes under Chapter 8 of the Australian Criminal Code Act of 1995 [text] which reflects the law of the International Criminal Court [official website]. That investigation is ongoing. Anvil has insisted that any allegations that it assisted in or had knowledge of any wrongdoing are unfounded [Anvil press release, PDF]. Reuters has more. RAID has issued a press release on the court recommendation and has additional background on the Kilwa incident.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former FDA chief pleading guilty to not reporting financial interest in companies
Joe Shaulis on October 16, 2006 5:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Dr. Lester Crawford [official website], a veterinarian who served briefly as commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [official website] last year, will plead guilty to failure to disclose his financial interest in companies regulated by the agency, his lawyer said Monday. Crawford is scheduled to appear in federal court Tuesday to enter guilty pleas to charges of false writing and conflict of interest - misdemeanors with a combined maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment. The charges [criminal information, PDF] resulted from a grand jury investigation [JURIST report] begun after the New York Times reported [text] that financial disclosure forms from Crawford and his wife showed they had sold shares in FDA-regulated companies, such as Embrex, Sysco, Teleflex and PepsiCo [corporate websites]. In fact, Crawford's lawyer said Monday, the couple retained ownership of the shares, resulting in "errors and omissions" on the disclosure forms.
Crawford resigned after only three months as FDA commissioner [JURIST report] amid criticism that he delayed a decision to authorize over-the-counter distribution of emergency contraception [product backgrounder]. Crawford and supporters argued that his refusal was grounded on scientific and legal concerns rather than political ideology [JURIST report], but a Government Accountability Office report [PDF text] characterized the FDA's review as procedurally "unusual" [JURIST report]. The existence of the criminal investigation was disclosed during proceedings in a civil suit against Crawford [JURIST report] brought by the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights in response to the debacle. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Senior Abu Ghraib interrogator faces Article 32 hearing
Joe Shaulis on October 16, 2006 4:02 PM ET

[JURIST] US Army prosecutors argued in a hearing Monday that an officer overseeing interrogations at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] should face a court-martial for his willful blindness toward prisoner abuse, while a defense attorney countered that most of the military police officers who abused prisoners were not under his client's command. Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan [Wikipedia profile; JURIST news archive], former director of the Joint Interrogation Debriefing Center [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], is the highest-ranking officer charged with crimes [JURIST report] at Abu Ghraib, including three counts of dereliction of duty, two counts of making false official statements, two counts of willfully disobeying orders and one count of cruelty and mistreatment [UCMJ text].
Jordan's Article 32 hearing [JAG backgrounder] - the military equivalent of a civilian grand jury proceeding - is expected to last up to six days, with testimony from about 50 witnesses. If court-martialed and convicted on all 12 counts, Jordan could be sentenced to a maximum of 42 years in prison. While 11 soldiers and lower-ranking officers have been convicted in connection abuses at Abu Ghraib, superior officers have so far only received punishments such as reprimands, fines and being relieved of command [JURIST report]. A 2004 Army report [PDF text; JURIST report] recommended that Jordan and his superior officer be punished for their role in the abuse scandal. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Missouri high court rejects voter ID law
Joe Shaulis on October 16, 2006 3:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Missouri [JURIST news archive] on Monday affirmed a trial court decision [JURIST report] striking down a state law [SB 1014 text, PDF; summary] requiring voters to show Missouri-issued photo identification at the polls [Missouri Dept. of Revenue backgrounder]. In a per curiam opinion [summary and text], a 6-1 majority held that requiring voters to present ID cards [JURIST news archive] violates the equal protection and voting-rights clauses [text] of the Missouri Constitution [text]. Applying strict scrutiny analysis, the court found that requiring Missourians to obtain IDs imposes more than a minimal burden on their voting rights [JURIST news archive], noting that it requires "time, funds and advance planning." The court also held that the provision was not narrowly tailored to the compelling state interest of preventing voter fraud, noting that [i]n fact, the only specific instance of possible fraud that has occurred since 2002 of which the witnesses were aware involved an attempt (whether intentional or accidental is not clear) by a person who had voted absentee to then vote in person. This conduct would not be affected by SB 1014 and was discovered and prevented prior to the implementation of the Photo-ID Requirement. In dissent, Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr. [official profile] wrote that the case was not ripe for consideration because the law provides for a two-year transitional period and that the law addressed evidence of voter fraud during the 2000 election.
The Missouri court heard oral arguments [JURIST report] on the combined appeals earlier this month. Similar voter ID laws have been upheld in Indiana and blocked in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania [JURIST reports]. The US House of Representatives has approved a bill that would require voter ID cards for federal elections [JURIST report] starting in 2008. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

EU signs interim air passenger data-sharing deal with US
Jaime Jansen on October 16, 2006 2:41 PM ET

[JURIST] The European Union [official website] on Monday formally signed an interim agreement [press release, PDF] giving the United States access to passenger name record data from European airlines conducting transatlantic flights. The US is expected to formally sign the deal later Monday while the EU will still need to submit the deal for all 25 EU member states to ratify at the national level. The interim deal, which was agreed upon on October 6, faced problems after EU and US officials failed to reach agreement [JURIST report] by a court-imposed October 1 deadline on how to share passenger information [Reuters report; DHS press release] without violating EU privacy laws. Since the Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive], the US has required airlines landing in the country to supply the name, address, telephone number and credit card details of every passenger. In May, however, the European Court of Justice [official website] struck down the agreement as illegal [JURIST report] under EU law, forcing the US and the EU to begin negotiating a new deal [JURIST reports].
The new passenger name record agreement [BBC Q&A; DHS press release] also requires the US Department of Homeland Security [official website] to ask for passenger data, rather than receiving the data automatically upon departure. The interim agreement is slated to expire in July 2007, as EU and US officials struggle to come to a long-term agreement with the US likely arguing for more extensive data sharing [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ launches research project to probe violent crime rate increase
Jaime Jansen on October 16, 2006 1:09 PM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] on Monday announced the launch [press release] of the Initiative for Safer Communities, responding to growing concern about the increase of violent crime in American cities. In the first increase since 2001, violent crime rose 2.2 percent in 2005 [JURIST report], according to the FBI's 2005 Uniform Crime Program [backgrounder], and under Gonzales' new initiative the Department of Justice will examine recent trends in gang violence, drug trafficking and prison release rates. The new DOJ review, announced in a International Association of Chiefs of Police in Boston, comes on the heels of a Police Executive Research Forum report [draft report, PDF; press release], which fueled concern about the increase of violent crime when it announced that murder, robbery and assault crimes rose [USA Today report] significantly in several cities at the beginning of 2006.
The DOJ will implement the comprehensive study in three phases, including observing crime increases in cities, analyzing observed crime rates for potential trends, and pinpointing current and potential federal programs that can help reduce violent crime rates. AP has more. USA Today has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam prosecutor's brother assassinated
Joshua Pantesco on October 16, 2006 11:38 AM ET

[JURIST] The brother of a prosecutor assigned to the second Saddam Hussein trial [JURIST news archive] was assassinated Monday morning in front of his house in West Baghdad. Imad al-Faroon was pronounced dead immediately after the shooting, which his wife witnessed. His brother, Muqith al-Faroon, is a chief prosecutor in the genocide case [JURIST report] against Hussein, where he is alleged to have ordered the killings of 100,000 Kurds during the so-called "Anfal" campaigns [HRW backgrounder] of the late 1980s. Last month, the brother-in-law of the chief judge presiding over the Anfal trial was killed [JURIST report], and several other relatives of the judge were injured. In the past year, three lawyers representing Hussein and his seven co-defendants have been killed [JURIST report], and international observers have questioned whether the defendants will receive a fair trial amid the violence.
Also on Monday, the Iraqi High Tribunal announced [JURIST report] that the next hearing in the Anfal case will be on November 5, though the court refused to say whether a verdict will be handed down at that time. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Israel president may face rape, sex harassment charges after police probe
Joshua Pantesco on October 16, 2006 9:17 AM ET

[JURIST] Israeli police have recommended that the Israeli attorney general indict President Moshe Katsav [official profile] on charges of rape, sexual harassment, indecent acts using force, and indecent acts without consent following their three-month investigation of at least 10 complaints against Katsav brought by former employees. A police source told the press Sunday that at least four or five of the cases are strong enough to support an indictment, and that evidence also exists to bring charges of grand larceny, fraud and breach of trust, and illegal wiretapping. Katsav's lawyer expressed surprise [Jerusalem Post report] at the scope of the charges, and said the president will resign if indicted [Haaretz report]. The lawyer also reminded the press, however, that the police have recommended charges against every prime minister investigated over the last 10 years, though none were ever brought to trial.
Legal commentators have called for Katsav's resignation [YNet report], and Israeli Attorney General Menahem Mazuz [official profile] has privately said that Katsav should take a leave of absence until a decision is made on whether Katsav will be indicted. Mazuz will decide whether to bring an indictment after a team of prosecutors reviews the evidence, which could take one month or longer. Israeli Education Minister Yuli Tamir [official profile] on Monday suggested that if Katsav refuses to resign, the Knesset should initiate impeachment procedures [Haaretz report] against him.
Katsav announced Monday that he will not attend the opening session of Knesset [Jerusalem Post report] to give the traditional opening speech. Knesset members had threatened to boycott if Katsav attended. AFP has more. Reuters has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

No verdict date set in Saddam Dujail case
Joshua Pantesco on October 16, 2006 8:50 AM ET

[JURIST] The Iraqi High Tribunal [JURIST news archive] convened briefly Monday and announced that the next hearing on the crimes against humanity charges [JURIST report] brought against Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive] will be on November 5, though the court refused to say whether a verdict will be handed down during the hearing. Jaafar al-Mussawi, chief prosecutor in Hussein's Dujail trial [BBC timeline], expressed optimism that a verdict would be handed down at the November 5 date, though it could be delayed pending further investigation. The verdict was originally expected Monday, but was postponed [JURIST reports] to give the judges more time to review the evidence against the former Iraqi dictator. Prosecutors had expected the court to set a date for the verdict [JURIST report] during Monday's hearing. AFP has more.
Defense team leader Khalil Duleimi told the press Sunday that Hussein was prepared to forgive those who shot his two sons in 2003 [CNN report], and that Hussein himself ordered his defense team to boycott [JURIST report] the ongoing "Anfal" trial, which is scheduled to resume Tuesday. IOL has more.
Prosecutors sought the death penalty for Hussein [JURIST report] in June for allegedly killing, torturing and illegally detaining Dujail residents, including 148 Shiites [JURIST report]. Hussein faces separate genocide charges [JURIST news archive] for allegedly killing 100,000 Kurds during the so-called "Anfal" campaigns [HRW backgrounder] of the late 1980s. He is eligible for the death penalty [JURIST report] in the Dujail case, and a US official, speaking anonymously, indicated that the Anfal trial could continue posthumously [JURIST report] should Hussein be executed before proceedings in the second trial conclude.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|