 |
|

Legal news from Friday, October 13, 2006 |
 |
|


Telecom merger stalls in FCC after DOJ antitrust approval
Alexandria Samuel on October 13, 2006 2:23 PM ET

[JURIST] A proposed $78 billion merger between telecom giants BellSouth [corporate website] and AT&T [corporate website] stalled unexpectedly Friday in the Federal Communications Commission [official website] after two FCC commissioners, both Democrats, asked Chairman Kevin Martin for more time to study it. The deal had already been approved [text] without reservation by the US Department of Justice Antitrust Division [official website] following an eight-month investigation that concluded that AT&T's proposed acquisition of BellSouth was not likely to "substantially reduce competition" in the US telecom market. Focusing on residential local and long distance services as well as telecom services to business customers, the Division concluded that the presence of other competitors, changing regulatory requirements and the emergence of new technologies in the market ensured that the "transaction is not likely to harm consumer welfare."
The companies began talks in 2001 [CNET report] and AT&T made a formal announcement of its intention to buy BellSouth on March 5, 2006. AT&T says the merger will create more effective and efficient services in the wireless, broadband, video, voice and data markets [AT&T press release]. Critics of the merger allege that the purchase will push the market back to the monopolistic Bell Telephone System - old "Ma Bell" [Wikipedia backgrounder] that was broken up in 1984 - and will create higher prices for consumers. In their letter [PDF] Friday, the Democratic FCC commissioners said that serious questions remained about whether the merger would serve the public interest, especially against the backdrop of other forms of consolidation and concentration in the telecommunications industry. In the immediate wake of the DOJ approval, Democratic commissioner Michael Copps [official profile] publicly assailed the Department, claiming it had "packed its bags and walked out on consumers and small businesses by refusing to impose even a single condition in the largest telecom merger the nation has ever seen." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Croatia journalist pleads not guilty to contempt for publishing ICTY witness names
Joe Shaulis on October 13, 2006 2:09 PM ET

[JURIST] Freelance Croatian journalist Domagoj Margetic, charged [indictment, PDF; JURIST report] with publishing the names of two protected witnesses online, pleaded not guilty to contempt of court Friday at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website; JURIST news archive]. Margetic is accused of publishing the names of witnesses who testified in the trial of Tihomir Blaskic [ICTY case backgrounder], a former Croatian militia commander in Bosnia who was convicted [judgment text] in 2000 of crimes against humanity, war crimes and other charges. Margetic allegedly obtained the names from prosecutors as a defendant in a previous contempt case [indictment] that was withdrawn [decision, PDF] in June. During his court appearance [ICTY press release], Margetic told Judge Alphons Orie that he was in poor health after a month-long hunger strike [SE Times report] to protest his detention.
A trial date has not been set. If convicted, Margetic could be imprisoned for up to seven years and fined up to 100,000 euros (US $125,400). In August, another Croatian journalist, Josip Jovic [JURIST news archive], was found guilty of contempt [judgment summary; JURIST report] and fined 20,000 euros (US $25,080) for publishing transcripts of a closed court session during Blaskic's trial. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pentagon orders probe into Marine's report of Guantanamo detainee abuse
James M Yoch Jr on October 13, 2006 12:10 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Department of Defense Inspector General [official website] on Friday announced that the armed force's Southern Command [official website] has been ordered to investigate [press release] allegations that detainee abuse is occurring at the military facility at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. Last week, USMC Lt. Col. Colby Vokey, who represents Canadian Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr [JURIST news archive], filed a complaint [JURIST report] based on comments a Marine paralegal allegedly overheard while visiting the prison. According to the paralegal, military guards suggested that abuse - including the arbitrary denial of privileges, physically striking detainees, and depriving the detainees of hydration - was "common practice" and laughed at stories of how prisoners had been handled.
On Thursday, UK Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett [official profile] called the lack of trials at Guantanamo "unacceptable" [JURIST report] in a human rights report. International rights groups have long urged the US to close the detention center, and their calls have lately been taken up by high-ranking officials in governments allied with the US in the "war on terror," including UK Attorney General Lord Goldsmith [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ohio congressman pleads guilty in Abramoff scandal
James M Yoch Jr on October 13, 2006 11:35 AM ET

[JURIST] US Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) [official website] on Friday pleaded guilty [plea agreement, PDF] to charges of conspiracy and making false statements in connection with his involvement with lobbyist Jack Abramoff [JURIST news archive]. Ney accepted money and gifts [JURIST report] in exchange for taking actions on behalf of Abramoff and his clients, sixteen of which were admitted by his former chief of staff Neil Volz [Wikipedia profile], who pleaded guilty to conspiracy in May. Although several people have been convicted in the scandal, including Abramoff, ex-White House head of procurement David Safavian, and former Tom DeLay aide Tony Rudy [JURIST reports], Ney's plea marks the first time a congressman has pleaded guilty or been found guilty in the scandal. Several other members of Congress, however, are currently under investigation [JURIST report].
Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle [official profile], sitting on the US District Court for District of Columbia, said prosecutors, who could recommend a sentence for up to ten years, have called for 27 months' imprisonment. Ney also faces $5,000 to $60,000 in fines when he is sentenced on January 19. Ney has asserted that he will resign before sentencing, but his term expires on January 3 since he did not seek re-election. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush signs tough internet gambling bill angering US bettors, foreign companies
David Shucosky on October 13, 2006 11:31 AM ET

[JURIST] US President Bush on Friday signed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 [HR 4411 summary; JURIST report], a bill attached to a larger port security measure [Reuters report] late last month by Congress, making it illegal for banks or credit card companies to process transactions involving Internet gambling. Internet gambling is an estimated $12 billion dollar a year business worldwide. Approximately half of that comes from US bettors, despite lingering questions about its legality [Duke Law backgrounder] and efforts by Congress to stamp it out. The law gives the government 270 days to draft regulations for enforcement. Reuters has more.
Upset gamblers [Chicago Tribune report] argue that the law will only push gambling underground, making it easier for disreputable websites to scam players. Others say the law is poorly written and difficult to enforce [Kansas City Star column], and argue that poker websites should be exempt as a game of skill, not chance.
Reaction from gambling site operators has been sharply divided. PokerStars, the second-largest poker website in the world, said in a statement that the ban "[does] not alter the U.S. legal situation with respect to online poker" [Reuters report], and also argued that poker is outside the scope of the law as a game of chance. However, other companies have promised to close up shop in US once the ban goes into effect [BBC report; Reuters report]. Regardless of their positions, companies have been forced to re-evaluate profit expectations and reconsider market strategies. Barclay's and Royal Bank of Scotland said they would take action to comply with the new law [Gambling 911 report]; NetTeller is taking a wait-and-see approach before announcing a position.
Opposition from the World Trade Organization may complicate matters. The small island nation of Antigua and Barbuda, which receives income and jobs from hosting gambling sites, have complained since 2003 that such restrictions on Internet gambling are illegal trade restrictions. In April 2005, a WTO board ruled [WTO case materials] that some restrictions did violate agreements [CNET report], but the complex ruling did not clearly rule in favor of one side or the other. Antigua is set to continue pursuing the matter along with some now-displaced British gambling sites [Guardian report], arguing that the ban is veiled protectionism disguised with moral outrage [Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial].
Read more JURIST coverage of Entertainment & Sports Law...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US soldier disputing Iraq war legality pleads guilty to AWOL charge
James M Yoch Jr on October 13, 2006 11:09 AM ET

[JURIST] US Army Sergeant Ricky Clousing [advocacy website; JURIST news archive], a paratrooper and interpreter who disputed the legality of the war in Iraq [JURIST news archive], has pleaded guilty to going absent without leave for 14 months. A court-martial [JURIST report] in Fort Bragg, NC, on Thursday sentenced Clousing to 11 months' confinement, with all but three months suspended, under a plea agreement that allowed him to avoid a finding of desertion. Clousing abandoned his post at Fort Bragg after reporting abuses committed by fellow soldiers during his five-month stint in Iraq, including the killing of an unarmed Iraqi teenager and the sideswiping of Iraqi civilian vehicles with a military transport. The military disciplined the soldiers implicated in the sideswiping but found that those involved in the shooting acted properly because they could have considered the teenager a threat.
Clousing, a born-again Christian, consulted his superiors, a staff psychologist, a base chaplain, an anti-war hotline, and friends before deciding to go AWOL, but he refused to request conscientious objector status [Selective Service backgrounder] or to claim he was insane or homosexual, as the psychologist allegedly suggested, to receive a discharge. After 14 months AWOL, Clousing turned himself in [JURIST report] at Fort Lewis, WA. In addition to the confinement [AP report], the military will demote Clousing, withhold two-thirds of his compensation and discharge him after the confinement period. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK House of Lords backs pardons for WWI soldiers executed for desertion
Kate Heneroty on October 13, 2006 8:40 AM ET

[JURIST] Members of Britain's House of Lords [official website] Thursday voiced their support for an amendment [JURIST report] to the Armed Forces Bill [legislative materials] that would pardon 306 World War I soldiers who were executed [backgrounder] for various offenses including cowardice, sleeping while on duty, striking a superior officer, disobedience and desertion. The bill, with the pardons amendment, passed through committee Thursday and if the bill receives final approval, a formal pardon would be placed in the court martial files of the men. Relatives of the executed soldiers have been seeking pardons since 1990 when Britain's Public Record Office [official website] declassified the records.
The families have argued that the soldiers had suffered from shell-shock [BBC backgrounder], a diagnosis not recognized at the time, and should not have been sent back into the trenches. Critics of the amendment have argued, however, that the pardons would effectively rewrite history [BBC backgrounder]. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US rejects latest UK call to close Guantanamo Bay
Kate Heneroty on October 13, 2006 8:01 AM ET

[JURIST] The US State Department has rejected Britain's latest call for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detention center, saying the prison would remain open as long as necessary and was needed to house "some very dangerous people." UK Foreign Minister Margaret Beckett [official profile] on Thursday called for Guantanamo's closure [JURIST report] because of its record on human rights and ineffectiveness in the fight against terror. Responding to Beckett's statement, State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said Thursday that the US doesn't want Guantanamo to remain open indefinitely [press briefing transcript] and noted that "We do now have a process, or in the near future will have a process, guided by U.S. law to deal with the people who are in Guantanamo Bay and we will deal with those people according to the law and according to our international treaty obligations and as were outlined by the Supreme Court. So we all look forward to the day when Guantanamo Bay is closed down." BBC News has more.
Meanwhile, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) [official website] said Friday that it had visited 454 Guantanamo detainees, including 14 new detainees who had recently been transferred to Cuba from secret CIA-operated prisons. Included in the new group of inmates are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [BBC profile], suspected mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and two other al Qaeda leaders, Ramzi Binalshibh and Abu Zubaydah. US officials maintain that these 14 inmates were the last to be held in secret prisons. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOD documents show monitoring of anti-war groups for terror threats database
Kate Heneroty on October 13, 2006 7:35 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Department of Defense (DOD) [official website] labeled anti-war activities as "potential terrorist activity" and monitored students, Quakers and other anti-war groups while collecting information for a domestic terror threats database, according to documents [case materials; press release] released Thursday by the American Civil Liberties Union [advocacy website]. The documents, obtained from the DOD under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit [JURIST report], indicate that the DOD's Threat and Local Observation Notice system, or TALON database [Wired report; JURIST news archive], relied on information provided from sources in the Department of Homeland Security, FBI terrorism task forces and local police departments to monitor anti-war activities.
The ACLU lawsuit came after an NBC News report in December revealed that the military maintained the database of "suspicious incidents," including peaceful anti-war protests and groups. Vietnam war era regulations [PDF text] limit what information the military can collect about people and activities taking place inside the US, and the Pentagon launched an investigation [DOD press release; JURIST report] into possible misuse of the program. According to DOD officials, the investigation revealed that 261 entries were improper and subject to removal [JURIST report]. Military official have also acknowledged that some records were kept longer than the DOD's internal 90-day policy even though the groups had been deemed not to be a threat. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|