 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, September 7, 2006 |
 |
|


Specter domestic surveillance bill hits wall in committee
Katerina Ossenova on September 7, 2006 5:00 PM ET

[JURIST] A bill [text, PDF; JURIST news archive] designed to put the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive] on a sound legal footing failed to make it out of the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] Thursday. Sponsored by committee chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website], the legislation [S.2453 summary] would have increased the secret warrant time limit from three to seven days, required progress reports from the US attorney general twice a year, and would have submitted the surveillance program for a one-time constitutional review. After Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI) [official website] criticized the bill at length and introduced four amendments, Specter voiced his displeasure at what he felt was a strategic move to filibuster the legislation.
US House and Senate lawmakers are considering other bills [JURIST report] relating to the controversial program, including one [summary] proposed by US Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) [official website]. Congress was faced with an urgent need to deal with the legal status of the surveillance program after a US District Court judge ruled [JURIST report] last month that it was unconstitutional and ordered the National Security Agency [official website] to immediately cease using warrantless wiretaps to intercept communications of suspected terrorists when one party to the communication is outside the US. AP has more.
9:24 PM ET - In a speech [transcript] Thursday, President Bush said he was confident that the federal court ruling on the NSA surveillance program would be overturned on appeal, but said that "a series of protracted legal challenges would put a heavy burden on this critical and vital program. The surest way to keep the program is to get explicit approval from the United States Congress. So today I'm calling on the Congress to promptly pass legislation providing additional authority for the Terrorist Surveillance Program, along with broader reforms in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam trial lawyer's assistant found murdered
Katerina Ossenova on September 7, 2006 3:34 PM ET

[JURIST] Defense lawyer Badih Aref Izzat, representing a co-defendant in Saddam Hussein's trial [JURIST news archive], announced Thursday that his assistant had been found murdered in Baghdad. Abdel Monem Yassin Hussein is said to have been kidnapped on August 29 and was found five days later in a hospital morgue with three gunshot wounds. Izzat is defending intelligence officer Farhan Al Juburi, on trial along with Hussein and five other co-defendants, on genocide and crimes against humanities charges [JURIST report] in connection with the so-called "Anfal" operation [HRW backgrounder] that led to the killings of as many as 180,000 Kurds in northern Iraq in the 1980s. The death follows a July hunger strike [JURIST report] by Hussein in protest at the earlier murder of three defense lawyers [JURIST report]. His defense team has already boycotted proceedings [JURIST report] to dramatize their call for greater security measures.
Hussein and his seven co-defendants are also charged with crimes against humanity [JURIST report] for allegedly killing, torturing and illegally detaining Dujail residents, as well as committing other inhumane acts, in response to an alleged 1982 assassination attempt on Hussein. The Iraqi High Tribunal is set to deliver a verdict on the Dujail charges on October 16, and Hussein is eligible for the death penalty [JURIST report]. Chief Judge Abdullah al-Amiri [JURIST report] has adjourned proceedings [JURIST report] until September 11, allowing time for the defense to file an appeal challenging the court's legitimacy. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court rejects Ohio rules for primary elections
Katerina Ossenova on September 7, 2006 2:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] held Thursday in a 2-1 opinion [text; PDF] that state rules on participation in Ohio's primary elections make it prohibitive for minority parties to be included on the ballot. The court ruled that the requirement that parties must file petitions with signatures 120 days before the election "have a negative impact on minor parties and on political activity as a whole in Ohio" by violating the First Amendment [text] of the US Constitution and imposing "a severe burden on the associational rights of the LPO, its members, and its potential vote-supporters." The Libertarian Party of Ohio (LPO) [official website] filed the appeal after its 2004 lawsuit against Secretary of State Ken Blackwell [official website], who denied the Libertarian Party access to the ballot, was thrown out by a lower court. A dissent by Judge Griffin points out that "the challenged Ohio election regulations treat the LPO the same as any other political party. The primary election required by the Ohio Constitution and petition filing time requirements chosen by the Ohio General Assembly are not severe, but reasonable, in order to insure a fair, honest, and orderly election."
A federal judge on Friday issued an order [JURIST report] directing Ohio voters to ignore threats of criminal penalties on voter registration forms and instructions [PDF text], saying that new state registration rules which took effect in May after the February passage of the controversial HB 3 election reform bill [text] by the Republican-dominated Ohio Legislature may violate the First Amendment and unduly burden efforts to register voters. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ HRW urges UN sanctions on Sudan officials over civilian attacks
D. Wes Rist on September 7, 2006 2:53 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Thursday's international brief, international NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] has said that the Sudanese government [official website in Arabic] has entered a prolonged campaign of randomly bombing civilian locations [press release] in the Darfur region [JURIST news archive] and asked the UN Security Council [official website] to initiate sanctions against key Sudanese government officials. Under Resolution 1591 [text, PDF], any entity or individual authorizing or practicing indiscriminate bombing of civilian locations in Darfur is subject to international sanctions. HRW called on the UN to activate these sanctions against Sudanese officials in control of military forces in Darfur. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
In other international legal news ... - Leading AIDS activist Hu Jia was taken from his home in Beijing by police officials who refused to show a police summons authorizing Hu's detention. Beijing police officials have refused to answer calls directed to the local police station in question. Hu is one of China's leading human rights campaigners and has spent the last month under house arrest for protests carried out against China's One Child Policy [government backgrounder]. Hu alleged that earlier this year he was held for nearly a month without cause or arrest in order to keep him from organizing protests and warned that he was seeking advice on suing the Chinese government [official website] for unlawful detention. The International Herald Tribune has more.
- Eddie Makue, the head of the South African Council of Churches [official website] has released a copy of a private letter, which he sent to key parliamentary officials in South Africa, that calls for the South African government [official website] to create a single, unified code for handling the country's marriage system. The South African Constitutional Court [judicial website] ruled in a 2005 decision [judgment, PDF; summary] that the current definition of marriage was unconstitutional and gave the government until December 2006 to provide a new definition [JURIST report]. The current administration proposed a dual system of legislation for handling marriage and domestic and civil partnerships. Makue warned that separate systems of law have proven repeatedly to never be equal and that the government should focus simply on complying with the constitution and allowing individuals and religious faiths the freedom to exercise their faith as they wished. Makue also argued that the best way to keep legal treatment of individuals in South Africa equal would be to simply amend the Marriage Act [PDF text], rather than create a new legal system for a different "class" of people. South Africa's Mail & Guardian Online has local coverage.
- Indonesian Defense Minister Juwono Sudarsono has said that, despite continued pressure from the Indonesian Parliament (MPR) [official website in Bahasa Indonesian] and the final approval of an amendment to the Indonesian Military Law, the structure for trying military personnel of all ranks in civilian courts, rather than military, would not be ready to implement within the two year time limit placed by the MPR. The law's amendment was a response to public perception that military tribunals were whitewash affairs for officers and enlisted personnel accused of misconduct and crimes against civilians. Under the amendment, any military person charged with crimes against an Indonesian civilian will be tried in civilian courts. Sudarsono argued that, while the government [official website in Bahasa Indonesian] was committed to the amendment, the criminal justice system in Indonesia was not prepared for the introduction of these trials and that the nation's Criminal Code has no provisions in place for implementing such trials, implying that the Criminal Code would need to be amended as well before the amendment could take effect. The Jakarta Post has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Top DOD lawyers say charged terrorists should see all evidence against them
Holly Manges Jones on September 7, 2006 2:28 PM ET

[JURIST] The Defense Department's top military lawyers testified [recorded audio] Thursday before the US House Armed Services Committee [official website], urging Congress to reject White House proposals that would keep some evidence from suspected terrorists who face prosecutions. The Bush administration submitted [JURIST report] the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [PDF text; White House fact sheet] Wednesday, which among other things calls for classified information to be kept private, but military lawyers including Maj. Gen. Scott Black [official profile; prepared statement, PDF], Judge Advocate General of the US Army [official website], expressed concern that US soldiers captured abroad could face the same standards. Thursday's testimony echoed that given by some of the same military lawyers at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing [JURIST report] in July on the implications of the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ruling.
The lawyers said allowing suspected terrorists to see all evidence was a requirement of the Geneva Conventions [ICRC materials] and in line with the rights offered in other country's court systems. US Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) [official website], head of the House committee, alternatively argued that the disclosure of classified information could reveal intelligence sources to the public. President Bush Thursday urged Congress [speech transcript; Reuters report] to pass the military commissions legislation, saying that the sooner Congress acts the sooner detainees will be brought to justice. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Florida high court to evaluate new proposal banning 'hidden' court cases
Holly Manges Jones on September 7, 2006 12:52 PM ET

[JURIST] The Florida Supreme Court [official website] plans to analyze newly proposed rules that would stop the practice of sealing certain court cases from public view in a system that Chief Justice Fred Lewis [official profile] said has "gone awry" Wednesday. A Miami Herald investigation [report] uncovered over 400 hidden negligence, malpractice, divorce, and criminal cases involving judges, lawyers, politicians, businessmen, and police officers in the Broward County Circuit Court [official website] since 1989. Lewis called on the Florida Association of Court Clerks and Comptrollers [profession website] to conduct a probe into the cases on the secret docket [PDF list], and the resulting proposals by the group would mandate public hearings before a judge could seal any court record and would require written explanations before making any information private.
The Florida Supreme Court will review the suggested rules over the next few weeks. The rules may be adopted in whole or in part, or the judiciary could create their own rules, which may be implemented by an emergency order. The Florida public will also have the chance to give their opinion on the rules before a decision is reached by the court. The Miami Herald has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Amnesty blasts Colombia protections for human rights activists
Jaime Jansen on September 7, 2006 11:39 AM ET

[JURIST] Amnesty International [advocacy website] on Thursday criticized Colombia [press release] for allowing attacks on human rights defenders, calling on the international community to provide more support for local activists in Colombia [JURIST news archive]. In a new report [text] released Thursday, Amnesty blamed the Colombian government for facilitating hostilities against human rights activists and highlighted an apparently coordinated effort by Colombian security forces and paramilitary groups to discredit activists. Amnesty also called on Colombian President Alvaro Uribe [BBC profile] to publicly recognize "the legitimacy of human rights activists," prosecute those responsible for human rights violations, and prevent the "use of unfounded criminal charges against human rights activists."
Though Amnesty says rights workers receive limited physical protections from the Colombian government, it argues that activists need guarantees that the government will respect their efforts to expose human rights violations in the country, particularly in remote areas with a weak government presence. Several activist groups and individuals have been threatened politically and physically, and Amnesty argues that the government undermines the work of the activists by not investigating threats and effectively silences some activists. Earlier this year, the International Federation for Human Rights and the Geneva-based World Organisation Against Torture [advocacy websites] cited Colombia in a study [text, PDF; JURIST report] detailing the thousands of activists around the world that were subject to murder, assaults, imprisonment and other forms of repression in 2005. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rights groups call for more details on secret CIA prisons
Holly Manges Jones on September 7, 2006 11:12 AM ET

[JURIST] Rights activists on Thursday called for more information from the US government regarding secret CIA prisons where high-value terror suspects have been detained, saying that though US President George Bush's acknowledgement [JURIST report] Wednesday of the prisons' existence was welcome, more information needs to be disclosed. Manfred Nowak [DOC profile], the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture [official website], called the transfer of 14 high-value terror suspects [DNI profiles, PDF] to Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] from secret detention centers an "improvement," but pointed out that there may be many more detainees being held in undisclosed locations. The London-based rights group Liberty [advocacy website], meanwhile, on Thursday called on the UK government [press release] to "come clean" on any involvement with the US regarding the secret prisons. AP has more.
Also Thursday, EU lawmakers urged European countries which housed the prisons to step forward with any information they may have. Wolfgang Kreissl-Doerfler [official website, in German], a member of the European Parliament [official website] committee investigating the allegations [official website; JURIST report], stressed the importance of EU countries or those seeking membership to reveal their participation, including Poland and Romania, both accused of being involved [JURIST report]. Members of the committee are planning to visit Poland, Romania, Great Britain, and Germany as part of their investigation. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge sets fraud trial date for UK Enron bankers
Katerina Ossenova on September 7, 2006 9:24 AM ET

[JURIST] US District Court Judge Ewing Werlein has set either February 5 or September 4, 2007 as the trial date for three former British bankers [JURIST news archive], known as the Natwest Three, who face fraud charges related to the Enron scandal [JURIST news archive]. Defense lawyers argued for a late trial date in order to allow sufficient time to complete their investigations both in the UK and in the US, but Werlein set the February date in case the defense completes their preparation earlier than expected. In a pretrial conference Wednesday, Werlein also denied a defense motion to have him removed from the case because of a possible conflict of interest as a result of his association with his former law firm Vinson & Elkins [official website], which had represented Enron prior to its 2001 collapse.
David Bermingham, Giles Darby, and Gary Mulgrew were extradited to the US [JURIST report] to face seven counts of wire fraud [indictment, PDF] each for allegedly entering into a secret agreement with former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow [Chronicle profile] to defraud National Westminster Bank of $19 million while keeping $7 million for themselves. All pleaded not guilty and have been living in the US [JURIST reports] since July 13 on a $1 million bond that requires their presence in the US pending trial. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|