Opponents say the legislation is troubling because large developers with significant financial resources who are unhappy with unfavorable local zoning decisions will be able to strongarm localities who cannot afford to litigate every zoning decision in federal courts. Bill sponsor Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH) [official website] says the proposed legislation is a reaction to the Supreme Court decision in San Remo Hotel v. San Francisco [Duke Law case backgrounder; opinion text, PDF], where the Court held that federal courts must give full faith and credit to final decisions rendered by state courts made solely under state law where litigants also brought federal Takings claims. A cost estimate [PDF text] released by the Congressional Budget Office suggests that such legislation would increase both the caseload of the federal courts and the number of claims brought against the United States government. No Senate action was expected on the measure prior to adjournment. The Washington Times has more. The Washington Post has additional coverage.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.