 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, August 29, 2006 |
 |
|


Libya AIDS trial prosecutor calls for death penalty for Bulgarian nurses
Katerina Ossenova on August 29, 2006 4:20 PM ET

[JURIST] The prosecutor in the Libyan retrial of five Bulgarian nurses [JURIST report] and one Palestinian doctor accused of infecting over 400 patients, primarily children, with the HIV virus, on Tuesday called for the death penalty in the case. The trial resumed [JURIST report] on May 11 with the testimony of prosecution witnesses [JURIST report], including testimony from a young girl who is among those infected. The trial now stands adjourned until September 5 in order to allow the prosecutor to summon defense witnesses who have not yet appeared in court.
The six health workers were first convicted in May 2004 and sentenced to death [JURIST reports] for deliberately infecting the children, but the Libyan Supreme Court overturned the convictions [JURIST report] in December 2005 and ordered a retrial. Bulgaria and its allies, including the US [JURIST report] and the European Union, contend that the nurses are innocent and maintain that their confessions were coerced through torture. The defendants, detained since 1999, previously argued that the children were infected with the virus before treatment. French Professor Luc Montagnier, the co-discover of the HIV virus, testified [JURIST report] that the infection had spread in the children's hospital before the Bulgarian nurses began their contracts there. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Central African Republic ex-president convicted for fraud in absentia
Lisl Brunner on August 29, 2006 2:36 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Central African Republic President Ange Felix Patasse [Wikipedia profile] was convicted in absentia Tuesday on fraud charges and sentenced to 20 years hard labor. Patasse and four other members of his former government have been charged with embezzlement and fraud stemming from transactions with the Libyan government in 1999 and 2000, but none were present for the trial in Bangui, which began a week earlier than the projected September 4 start date. One of Patasse's former advisers was also convicted of fraud and another advisor was found guilty of embezzlement. Patasse and another co-defendant will be tried on separate embezzlement charges in about two months.
Patasse, presently living in Togo, served as president of the Central African Republic [CIA backgrounder] from 1993 to 2003, when he was overthrown by current President Francois Bozize [BBC profile]. On Saturday, Patasse said that he did not recognize the authority of the court [Reuters report], dismissing the charges as an attack on him by a "fascist regime." Earlier this year, Patasse was referred [JURIST report] to the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] for alleged war crimes during the 2002 suppression of an attempted coup, and the ICC is currently weighing those allegations. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Families seek damages from French railroad for carrying Jews to WWII camps
Lisl Brunner on August 29, 2006 2:04 PM ET

[JURIST] Two hundred families plan later this week to demand damages from SNCF [corporate website], the French state-run railway system, in connection with the company's transportation of Jewish families to German concentration camps during World War II. The demand comes two months after a French trial court held SNCF liable [JURIST report] for damages to the family of Alain Lipietz [official website], a member of the European Parliament whose relatives were carried to a transit camp during the war on SNCF railways. The families, from the United States, France, Israel, Belgium, and Canada, have threatened to sue within two months if SNCF does not pay several million euros to compensate them for their relatives' suffering.
SNCF is appealing the June ruling, claiming that it had no choice but to follow German orders during the period in question. The families are taking action before the statute of limitations expires on September 1, an issue that caused a similar civil claim against SNCF to be dismissed in 2003. BBC News has more. Le Monde has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australia control order on terror suspect debated
Bernard Hibbitts on August 29, 2006 2:02 PM ET

[JURIST] Australian legal and political observers appeared split Tuesday in the wake of the Australian government's first control order under new anti-terror laws limiting the activities of an uncharged terror suspect. A court Monday issued the order [JURIST report] at the instance of Attorney General Philip Ruddock; under it, Joseph Terrence "Jihad Jack" Thomas [advocacy website] is required to stay within the city of Melbourne, report to police three times a week, remain at home between midnight and 5 AM each day, and only use an approved provider to connect to telephones and the Internet. Critics called the order unwarranted [Sydney Morning Herald report], pointing out that Thomas' original terror-related conviction [BBC report] had been overturned [Australian report; judgment] by the Victoria Court of Appeal as to all charges earlier this month, and suggesting that the order was a political ploy to support government policy and avoid embarrassment. Others, however, including federal opposition leader Kim Beazley, said that the order was a prudent security measure [ABC Australia report] and that a onetime terror suspect like Thomas should be treated analogously to a sex offender who presented an ongoing danger to the public even while ostensibly "free."
Thomas was the first Australian incarcerated under the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Act 2002 [text] after having been found guilty in February of receiving $3,500 from a senior Al Qaeda member and of carrying a fake passport. His conviction was overturned because authorities were found to have interviewed Thomas against his will and without access to a lawyer when he was arrested in Pakistan in 2003. The interim control order issued against him is scheduled will be challenged [ABC Australia report] at a Federal Court hearing scheduled for Friday in the Australian capital of Canberra. On Tuesday, Ruddock, speaking to reporters, expressed confidence [transcript] that the order would be upheld: you [have to] recognize that there will be legal challenges around what you may seek to do even though it’s there for the purpose of protecting the Australian community you have to be assiduous in assuring that the evidence that will be presented will stand up to scrutiny. And the Australian Federal Police have been, in dealing with these issues, very conscious of the significant tests that they may have to meet in bringing forward proposals The Sydney Morning Herald has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chertoff chides EU on passenger data restrictions in light of airplane plot
Bernard Hibbitts on August 29, 2006 12:10 PM ET

[JURIST] US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff called for broader US access to European airline passenger data Tuesday in a Washington Post editorial, citing the recently-alleged plot by UK terror suspects [JURIST report] to detonate explosives aboard US airliners flying to the US from Britain. Noting that "British authorities, in partnership with the United States and our allies, were able to disrupt the recent terrorist plot against passenger aircraft precisely because of timely, actionable intelligence, properly shared and acted upon before the terrorists could carry out their plans", he expressed concern that "despite the strong links we've forged with our European partners to protect our nations, we still remain handcuffed in our ability to use all available resources to identify threats and stop terrorists."
Chertoff singled out for criticism European privacy concerns that "have limited the ability of counterterrorism officials to gain broad access to data of this sort," complaining that under an agreement with the European Union, U.S. Customs and Border Protection receives this information regularly, but it cannot routinely share it with investigators in another DHS component, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or with the FBI -- never mind with our allies in London. This information might yet identify associates of those arrested in the plot in Britain, but the rules blind us in routinely searching for that connection. "All governments," concluded Chertoff,bear a responsibility to prevent terrorists from boarding aircraft, and information sharing is a critical way we can work together to limit terrorist mobility, screen for unknown threats and investigate terrorist cells. Smart screening -- including careful and responsive analysis of travel data -- will enhance security and privacy. Chertoff's remarks come in the wake of a controversial May ruling by the European Court of Justice striking down as illegal [JURIST report] an earlier agreement between the European Union and the US that compelled European airlines to disclose information about passengers flying from Europe to the US. In June, European Union diplomats said they would draft a new agreement [JURIST report] that compels European airlines to disclose information about passengers flying from Europe to the US, projecting that it would be finished by October 1. Earlier this month the US Department of Homeland Security began requiring passenger data to be sent to US authorities [JURIST report] before flights leave Britain, notwithstanding obstacles posed by European privacy laws.
Chertoff's praise of UK information-sharing also comes as US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has promised a closer examination of US anti-terror policies in light of British practices [JURIST report]. Immediately after the disclosure of the latest airplanes plot, Chertoff himself suggested that anti-terror laws need to be constantly reviewed [JURIST report] in order to ensure that "they're helping us, not hindering us," and that "maximum flexibility" in monitoring suspects' communications and other transactions is necessary in order to disrupt future terror attacks.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Mexico presidential challenger rejects electoral court recount
Bernard Hibbitts on August 29, 2006 8:35 AM ET

[JURIST] Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador [campaign website, in Spanish], the leftist candidate challenging the results of Mexico's disputed July 2 presidential election [JURIST report], has rejected Monday's ruling by the country's Federal Electoral Tribunal [official website, in Spanish] reducing the lead of leader Felipe Calderon [campaign website, in Spanish] by only some 4000 votes after a partial recount. In a speech to supporters in Mexico City late Monday, Obrador accused the Tribunal's judges of serving the interests of the country's elite and declared that "We will never again allow an illegal and illegitimate government to be installed in our country."
The Tribunal has until September 6 to take the final official step of declaring a winner of the disputed contest pursuant to a final official tally. Obrador, who had unsuccessfully called for a full recount [JURIST report] of all ballots cast in the poll he insists was broadly tainted by fraud, says he will introduce what he called an "alternative" government at a rally scheduled for September 16, Mexico's Independence Day. AP has more. From Mexico City, El Universal has local coverage [in Spanish].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|