 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, July 20, 2006 |
 |
|


Former Khmer Rouge leader Ta Mok dies before genocide trial
Tom Henry on July 20, 2006 7:48 PM ET

[JURIST] Cambodian genocide suspect Ek Choeun, also known as Ta Mok [Trial Watch profile], died Thursday after having slipped into a coma [JURIST report] in Phnom Penh earlier this week. He was 80. The former zone secretary and central committee member of the Khmer Rouge [JURIST news archive], who had been suffering from high blood pressure, tuberculosis, respiratory and other problems, was initially hospitalized late last month [JURIST report]. Ta Mok's death means that he will avoid prosecution before the Khmer Rouge genocide tribunal [task force website, in Khmer; timeline] scheduled to begin holding trials next year.
Ta Mok, captured in 1999, and Khang Khek Leu, the former S-21 [Wikipedia backgrounder] torture center chief better known as "Comrade Duch," were the only former Khmer Rouge leaders from the 1975-79 communist regime already in prison awaiting trial. Just last week, official investigations began [JURIST report] into criminal acts allegedly committed by surviving leaders of the communist Khmer Rouge regime, which ruled Cambodia from 1975 to 1978 and was responsible for the deaths of at least 1.5 million Cambodians by execution, forced hardships or starvation in the so-called "Killing Fields." Prosecutors have warned, however, that it could take several months to return indictments [JURIST report]. Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan, who all remain free, are also likely to face prosecution if they survive. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former Saddam deputy PM Aziz files habeas petition with US Supreme Court
Joshua Pantesco on July 20, 2006 2:53 PM ET

[JURIST] A lawyer for Tariq Aziz [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], former deputy prime minister and foreign minister for ousted Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, has filed a habeas corpus petition [DOC text] with the US Supreme Court [official website], seeking his release from the custody of coalition forces in Iraq. Aziz lawyer Giovanni Di Stefano [law firm website; Aziz case file] presented two questions to the Court Wednesday: (1) "Is Petitioner's incommunicado detention, whereby he is prohibited access to family or to legal counsel, in accordance with law?" and (2) "Is the turning over of Petitioner Tariq Aziz to an authority that may reasonably be expected to violate his rights to a fair trial, due process of law, and his right to life in accordance with the law?" In the petition, Di Stefano argues that the US has violated the due process rights of Aziz under the Fourth and Fifteenth Amendments, as well as under military and international human rights law, and that attempts to deny Aziz the right to challenge his detention violate both Article 1 of the US Constitution, as well as international law. LectLaw has background on habeas corpus petitions.
Rule 20 Section 1 [text] of the US Supreme Court Rules [text] reminds applicants that Issuance by the Court of an extraordinary writ authorized by 28 U. S. C. §1651(a) is not a matter of right, but of discretion sparingly exercised. To justify the granting of any such writ, the petition must show that the writ will be in aid of the Court's appellate jurisdiction, that exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court's discretionary powers, and that adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form or from any other court. Section 4 of the same Rule specifies that "To justify the granting of a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner must show that exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court's discretionary powers, and that adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form or from any other court. This writ is rarely granted."
Captured in April 2003 after the US-UK invasion of Iraq, Aziz initiated a hunger strike [JURIST report] earlier this month to protest the refusal of prison authorities to grant him access to his lawyer. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has conditionally agreed [press release] to hear a request [text, DOC] by Aziz claiming that his security could be endangered if US forces turn Aziz over to Iraqi authorities. Di Stefano has called on the American Bar Association and the International Bar Association to support his client's petition, as they did for Guantanamo detainee Salim Ahmed Hamdan [JURIST news archive]. Read Di Stefano's full press release.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK criminal justice review calls for tougher sentencing rules, more rights for victims
Joshua Pantesco on July 20, 2006 2:01 PM ET

[JURIST] Responding to recent controversy over UK sentencing guidelines [JURIST report] and following up on a major June policy address [JURIST report] by Prime Minister Tony Blair, Home Secretary John Reid [official profile] on Thursday released a criminal justice system review [PDF text; summary] making several recommendations aimed at putting the rights of victims before the rights of criminals. To strengthen sentencing procedure, the Home Office recommended ending automatic sentence reductions in exchange for guilty pleas, ending automatic parole consideration rights for life prisoners, requiring unanimous parole board votes to release prisoners, and deporting more foreign citizens to serve sentences in their home countries. To give victims a stronger voice in the process, the Home Office is recommending that parole board members dealing with violent or sexual offenders have personal experience with such crimes, that victims be allowed to speak at such hearings, and that prosecutors always consider the interests of the victim when prosecuting. The Home Office also announced plans to construct 8,000 additional prison cells.
The reform announcements coincided with the release of new UK crime statistics [press release] demonstrating that violent crime rates have remained steady in recent years, as well as the announcement of a plan to reform the Home Office itself [press release] by increasing public accountability and cutting staff. Prime Minister Tony Blair praised the Home Office [press release] on Thursday for its recent efforts. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights expert calls for independent war crimes inquiry in Gaza
Jaime Jansen on July 20, 2006 12:49 PM ET

[JURIST] Paul Hunt, the UN Human Rights Council's Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, has called for an independent inquiry into war crimes in Gaza, saying that some Israeli attacks on Gaza are a violation of international humanitarian law [ICRC backgrounder, PDF]. In a statement [text] issued Wednesday, Hunt noted that the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip area of Israel [JURIST news archive] significantly worsened between March and June 2006 and condemned the destruction of Gaza's only electric power station [AP report], saying that it threatens the health and safety of civilians due to water shortages and faulty sewage disposal in households, as well as a potential outbreak of communicable diseases.
Hunt said the power station attack may be a war crime under the International Bill of Rights [OHCHR backgrounder] and international humanitarian law, because international law prohibits attacks on civilians. It is questionable whether the Gaza power station made "an effective contribution to the enemy's military action" and destruction of the power station provided "a definite military advantage to the attacker," in order to allow an attack on such a target. Hunt added that the attack on the power station was a war crime if it "was not in conformity with international humanitarian law it amounts to a war crime," and that if the attack caused a disproportionate impact on the civilian population. Hunt also called for the immediate release of Corporal Gilad Shalit, the captured Israeli soldier that sparked violence between Israel and the Hamas led Palestinian Authority in June. IRNA has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.
Meanwhile, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Thursday condemned Israel for using excessive force [statement text] in Lebanon and Hezbollah [CFR backgrounder] for its attacks on civilians. In an address to the UN Security Council, Annan said "Both the deliberate targeting by Hezbollah of Israeli population centres with hundreds of indiscriminate weapons and Israel's disproportionate use of force and collective punishment of the Lebanese people must stop." Annan also called for the International Committee of the Red Cross and other humanitarian agencies to be granted access to civilians. The UN News Centre has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Amnesty condemns Google, Yahoo, Microsoft for China 'Internet oppression'
Joshua Pantesco on July 20, 2006 10:48 AM ET

[JURIST] Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] took Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo! [corporate websites] to task for "Undermining Freedom of Expression in China" [PDF report] as part of a campaign, launched [press release] Thursday, to "combat internet oppression" worldwide. The report alleges that the Internet companies have been complicit in efforts by the Chinese government to silence government critics, in violation of stated corporate policies, and calls upon the companies to petition the Chinese government for the release of "cyber-dissidents."
The Internet companies have made deals with the Chinese government in the past to censor specific search terms that the government finds offensive, such as "human rights," and have complied with subpoena requests to hand over information that has led to the incarceration of Chinese journalists. Such censorship drew sharp criticism from the US Congress [JURIST report] in February, while Google defended the companies' actions [testimony, PDF] as "a meaningful, though imperfect, contribution to the overall expansion of access to information in China." In the run-up to those congressional hearings, Yahoo expressed support for freedom of speech in China [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FISA terrorism changes debated at House Intelligence hearing
Joshua Pantesco on July 20, 2006 9:49 AM ET

[JURIST] During an uncommon open session [PDF witness list] of the US House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, several legal heavyweights debated whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [text] should be revamped to meet the challenges presented by terrorism. Under the current procedure authorized by FISA, the US Justice Department (DOJ) must seek a warrant from the court established by FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) [FJC backgrounder], before using a wiretap. Judge Richard Posner [academic website] of the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals suggested that while the warrant process works well when a crime has already been committed, the burden of proof required to secure a warrant is often insurmountable when the goal of intelligence-gathering is merely to identify potential terrorists. American Bar Association (ABA) President Michael Greco [ABA profile] warned the panel that easing the burdens of proof required to conduct surveillance would undermine the protections of the Fourth Amendment [text].
The committee's ranking minority member, Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), introduced a bill [HR 5371 summary; Harman statement] in May that would reinforce the principle that FISA is the proper means "by which domestic electronic surveillance may be conducted." That bill has the support of 60 Democratic co-sponsors. Several Committee Republicans on Tuesday introduced a competing bill [press release] (HR 5825, text not yet available) to update FISA. That legislation would replace current language with "technology-neutral" terms, shift FISA's focus from how surveillance is to be accomplished to whether probable cause exists to conduct a search at all, and provides the president with the ability to circumvent FISA altogether in the event of a terrorist attack. Last week, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) announced that President Bush had agreed to allow FISC oversight of the NSA domestic surveillance program [JURIST report]. CNET News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US exhumation of Iraq rape victim refused by relatives
Joshua Pantesco on July 20, 2006 9:22 AM ET

[JURIST] Relatives of four Iraqi citizens who were allegedly murdered by US soldiers in the town of Mahmudiya (also "Mahmoudiya") [JURIST news archive] are refusing US requests to exhume the bodies, complicating the US case against the six soldiers. No rape test was performed on the body of a 14-year-old girl who US officials believe was raped, forcing the prosecution to rely heavily on the suspects' accounts. Local Iraqi officials have opened an investigation into the case separate from that of the US military. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has called for an independent probe [JURIST report] and for an end to US troops' immunity under CPA Order 17 [PDF text], which exempts coalition forces, diplomats and US contractors from the "Iraqi legal process."
The US military charged [JURIST report] four soldiers with the rape and murder of the 14-year-old and the murders of her family, and a fifth with dereliction of duty for failing to report the crimes. The five, previously held by the military while under investigation [JURIST report], will now face Article 32 hearings [Navy JAG backgrounder] to determine whether they will face courts-martial. A sixth man, who was discharged from the Army before the allegations arose, was charged [JURIST report] in federal court with murder and rape. He has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report]. Reuters has more. AP has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|